M/s v. SOUBHAGYA VALLI, APPEARS FOR SRI vs SEETHARAMA AVADHANI Counsel forthe
Case Details
Acts & Sections
1. Smt. Pamayyagari Parameshwari, Wo Sri' late Sri Pamayyagart i"tfly"n"rryun-a, about 59 years, Housewife, HNo' 1-9-278151212' Balaii Nagir, NeaiVenkateswara iemple, Ramnagar Gundu' Hyderabad 500044' Telangana State. 2. Sri. Pimayyagari Ramachander Goud, S/o Sri P' Arjun Goud' aged about 66 - V"rtt, O"6rpition. cultivation, H'No'6-12, Tellapur 502302 ' Telangana State' s 3iiPlt"uwLgari Pradeep Goud, S/o Sri' P lamachander Goud' aged about - 5S yurr., ijcc-upation. cuitivation, H No 6-12' Tellapur 502302' Telangana State +. Sti'errryyagari Hari Krishna Goud, S/o'Late Pamayyagari Ariun G-o^1!,^^ ,g"O ,o"Jioo years, Occupation' cultivation' H'No'6-11' Tellapur - 5o23o2' Telangana State
5. Sri PJmayyagary Pandu Goud, S/o Sri (late) P' G-urulingam Goud' aged - aOout Zg Vlais, bccupation. cultivation, H'No' 4-29' Tellapur 5O23O2' Telangana State 17 v"rr., O"6rpJtion. cultivation, H' No 4-29' Tellapur 5o23o2' Telangana State. 7. iri. Pamayyagari Venu goud, S/o' Sri' P Pandu Goud' aged about 43-years'
6. Sri. PJmayyagary Bhoopal goud, Slo S!'- P.13nd' 99!dt ^as:d. - Beside Hanuman Temple' Tellapur 5O23O2' Occupation c-ultivation, Telangana State. 8. Sri. PJmayyagari Karan Goud, S/o Sri (late) P' Gurulingam Goud' aged - aUout OO V6ars, Occupation. cultivation' H'No 4-30' Tellapur 502302' Telangana State. O. Sii. eimayyagari Sridhar goud, S/o Sri.' P' Karan Goud' aged about 44 years' - Oicupatio'n c-ultivation' H."trto'+-SZ /4' Near Pochamma Temple' Tellapur 5O23O2, Telangana State "Fl/o. .#a=*=.-z='-
10. Sri. Pamayyaqerri Arun Goud, S/o. Sri. P. Karan Goud, aged about 43 years, Occupation. cultivation, Fl/o. H.No.3-54l2A, Hanuman Temple Tellapur 502302, Telangana State. 11 . Sri. Pamayyagari Santosh Goud, S/o. Sri. P. Karan Goud, aged about 41 years, Occupat on. cultivation, Rl/o. H. No- 4-30, Tellapur, Telangana State. '12. Sri. Pamayyagari l/eghanath Goud, S/o. Sri (Late) P. Narayana Goud, aged about 56 years, Occupation. cultivation, Rl/o. H.No.4-20, Tellalrur 502302, Telangana Stat3.
13. Sri. Pamayyagari Nishanth Goud, S/o. Sri lVeghanath Goud, aged about 30 years, Occupation. cultivation, R/o. H.No.4-20, Tellapur 5O23C2, Telangana State.
14.Sri. Pamayyagari Vishal Goud, S/o. Sri Meghanath Goud, agerl about.28 years, Occupation. cultivation, H. No.4-20, Beside Hanuman T emple, Tellapur 502302, Telangana State '1 5.Sri Pamayyagari Narsing Rao, (Babu Goud), S/o. Sri. (late) Pamayyagari Venkat Krishnalah Goud, about 63 years, Occupation. Cultivat on, resident of H.No. 6-12,Te lapur, Sangareddy District, Telangana State
16.Sri. Pamayyagari Harish Goud, S/o. Sri. P. Narsing Rao Goud about 36 years ccupation. Cr:ltivation, resident of Tellapur, Sangareddy District, Telangana State '1 7.Sri. Pamayyergari Avinash Goud, S/o. Sri. P. Narsing Rao Goul, aged about 32 years, Occupation. Cultivation, resident of H.No. 6-'12,Tellaltur, Sangareddy D strict, Telangana State
18. Sri. Pamayyergari Surender Goud, S/o. Sri. (late) Pamayyagari Venkat Krishnaiah Goud, about 50 years, Occupatton. Cultivation, res dent of H.No. 6- l2,Tellapur, Sangareddy District, Telangana State '19. Sahiti Constructions, a registered Partnership Firm having its, crincipal place of business at Plot No. 1222, B-2-2g3l82lN 12221 F4, Fourth F oor, Road No. 36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033, Telangana State, represented by its Partner. Smt B Parvathi, Wo. B Lakshmi Narayana, FIat No. '102, Hara's Habitat, Jaihind Layout, Madhapur, Hyderabad 500081, Telanryana State. 20. Mr. Sumeet Kr-rmar Kedia, S/o. Sri Vinod Kumar Kedia, Aged about 43 years, Rl/o H. No. 5-9.i'.2152, Adarsh Nagar Hyderabad 500463 Respondent No.20 is impleaded as per court order dated 22.1 .2024 passed in lA No.2 of 2024 in ARBAPPL.No.291 of 2024 ...RESPONDENTS Arbitration r\pltlication filed under Section 1 1(6) of l,,rbitration and Conciliation Act, '1 996, praying that for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the High C:ourt may be pleased to appoint a Sole Artritrator for the purpose of adjudication of the disputes that have arisen betweer applicant and the Respondents 1 t,: 20 in respect of the terms of the Agreemen: of Sale dated 25logl2o19 2019 Lr:sl serious loss will ensure to Applicant. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. V. SOUBHAGYA VALLI, APPEARS FOR SRI V. SEETHARAMA AVADHANI Counsel forthe Respondent No.20: Mr. G. SURENDER APPEARS FOR The Court made the following: ORDER MT. SHYAM S. AGARWAL HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR ARBITRTTON APPLICATION No.291 OF 2o24 ORDER: Ms. V. Soubharya Valli, learned counsel appears for Mr' V.S.R.Avadhali, learned counsel for the a-pplicant' Mr' G' Surender, learned counsel appears for Mr. Shyam S'Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent No.2O.
2. This application under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties'
3. Admittedly, the parties had entered into Agreement for Sale dated 25.09.2019. Clause P of the aforesaid Agreement contains arbitration clause, which is extracted below for the facility of reference: "Any dispute arising between the parties hereto with respect to arry matter under this agreement or touching upon the meaning construction of interpretation of any of the clauses herein' shall be referred to an albitrator as per the law of arbitration, which may be in force ald applicable. The venue of Arbitration and Jurisdiction for all purposes shall be Hyderabad alone'" ii2i i 4 The app,licant got issued a legal notice to the respondents on 09.05.20113 and the same has failed to evoke any response.
5. Learned counsel for the parties jointly subrnit that the disputes had arisen between the parties ald th erefore, the arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes cetween the parties. It is further submitted that in similar circumstances orders are passed in Arb.App.No.22l of 2024 dated 13.12.2024 ald the leanted counsel seeks similar orders mav he passed in this applicatirtn. The relevant portion of the orde r passed in Arb.App.No,2'.>.1 of 2024 is extracted hereunder: "5. Learned counsel for the parties jointly s ubmit that tl-rt, disputes had arisen between the partier., and therefore , the arbitrator be appointed to adjudicat e tl-e dispute.s l)etween the parties. (t. In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Justice A. SzLntosh Reddy, a lormer Judge of this Court (Resident of PIot 1,tro.46, H.No.7ri-2 -740 /46, Kalyan Nagar, Gaddiar-rnaram, New MaIakpe., Hyderabad- 500060) ; Mobile No.97O5O534ri5) is appoint e,I as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The parties shall appear before ttre Arbitrator. along with a copy of this order. However, the sole arbitral o: shall proceed with the arbitral proceedin gs in accordzm ce with 1aw."
6. In vievr of the aforesaid submissions, Mr. Justice A. Saltosh Re,Idy, a former Judge of this Court (Resirlent of plot : ; ! I : ::3:: No.46, H.No.L6-2-740 / 46, Kalyan Nagar, Gaddiannaram, New Malakpet, Hyderabad-500060; Mobile No.9705053485), 1S I appointed as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The parties shall appear before the Arbitrator, along with a copy of this order. However, the sole arbitrator sha1l proceed with the arbitral proceedings in accordance with law. 7 . Accordingly, the Arbitration Application is disposed of.
8. Office to communicate a copy of this order to the learned Arbitrator Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO olNT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To, 1 . Sri Justice A. Santhosh ReddY' former Judge for the of Telangana, High , Kalyan Nagar' Court, Resident of Plot No.46, H.No.16-2-740/46 le No.9705053485. Gaddiannaram, New MalakPet, Hyd erabad 500060, tvlobi (By SPecial Messenger) (Along with a coPY of affidavit and a material paPers) z. b"lici to Sri V. Seetharama Avadhani' Advocate^[oPUCl A. 6;; cc; sri Shvam s' Asarwal' Advocate [oPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies Vt- 1\' !: ;TA i. [2 tN fl6 C; ,|, .'a ii * L v\v rl .) ,i f ^.-f HIGH COURT NVSK,J DATED:1010212025 r :_- IJ : '!. ORDER ARBAPPL.No.291 ot 2024 DISPOSING OF THE ARBITRATION APPLICATION G c"sJ> E6d