The High Court · 2025

Pamayyagari Parameshwari, Wo. Late Pamayyyagsri Satyanarayana, about 59 years, Housewife, R/o H No. 1-9-278151212, Balajinagar, Near venkateshwara Temple, Ramnagar Gundu, Hyderabad, 500044, Telangana State Pamayyagari Ramchander Goud, S/o. P. Arjun Goud, aged about 66 years, Occu Cultivation, R/o H No.6-'12, Tellapur, 502302, Telangana State Pamayyagari Pradeep Goud, S/o P. Rarnchander Goud, aged about 35 years, Occ cultivation, R/o H No.6-12, Tellapur-502302, Telanagana State. Pamayyagari Hari Krishna Goud, S/o Late Pamayyagari Arjun Goud, Aged about 79 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o H No, 6-1 '1, Tellapur, 502302, Telangana State Pamayyagari Pandu Goud, S/o Late P. Gurulingam Goud, aged about_79 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o H No. 4-29, Tellapur ,502302, Telangana State Pamayyagari Bhoopal Goud, S/o Sri.P.Pandu Goud,aged about 47 years, occ cultivation, H No.4-29, Tellapur, 502302, Telangana State Pamayyagari Venu Goud, S/o Sri. P. Pandu Goud, Aged about 43 years, OCC cultivation, R/o beside Hanuman temle, Tellapur , 502302, Telangana Sri. Pamayyagari Karan Goud, S/o Sri.(late) P. Gurulingam Goud, aged about 66 years, Occ Cultivation, H No 4-30, Tellapur, 502302, Telangana Pamayyagari Sridhar Goud, S/o Sri. P. Karan Goud,aged about 44 years, Occ Cuftivatron, H No 4-57'14, Near Pochamma Temple, Tellapur, 502302, Telangana Pamayyagari Arun Goud, S/o P. Karan Goud, Aged about 43 years, Occ Cultiv,tion, R/o H No 3-5412A, Hanuman Temple, Tellapur, 502302, Telangana State Pamayyagari Santosh Goud, S/o Sri- P. Karan Goud, Aged about 41 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o H No. 4-30, Tellapur, Telangana 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B o 10

12. Pamayyaq^ari lrleghanath Goud, S/o Sri (Late) p.Nara,Tana GoL,d, aqed about 5b years. Occ rjuttivation. R/o H No 4_20, Tellapur. SO23O2. Telanglna 13. Pamayyagari Nishanth Goud, S/o lvleghanath Goud, aqed about 30 vears. Occ Cultivation. R/o H No. 4-20 Tellipur 5O23O2. t6tangani. 14. Sri. Pamayy^agerri Vishal.Goud, Qlo lri t\Ieghanath Gar_rd, Aged about 2g ygqry, Occ Cultivation, H No. 4-20, Besiddhanuman t.:nipfel feffipJi,-- 502302. Telangtana 15. Sri Pamayyagari Narsing Rao (Babu Goud.1, S/o. Sri (lirte) pamavvaoari Venkat Krishnarah Ggud aboui 63 vears, occ curtivjil;: n6. ilil]i"rrrpr,, Sangareddy District. Telangana 16. qri Pamayyaga.itlarish Goud, S/o. Sri. p. Narsing. Rao Goud, about 36 years, occ Cuttivation R/o 6-12, Teilapur, sangareaoy di.triii -r"rJ"d;;;'"" ,"" 17 sri. Pamayy^agari Avinash Goud, S/o sri. p. Narsing Rao Goud aged about 32 years, Occ Cutt vation, Rto 6_12, Teilapur, SangaretOy Oinr"q iEi*grrr' ' '18. 9li:ljl_qyXqrri Surendar Goud S/o Sri (tate) pamayyagari Venkat Gou,l, about.50 years. Occ Cultivation. Rto6-i2 Tellapur, ^nsnnaran Sangareddy District, Telang'ana '19' Sahrti const'uctions,A registered partnership frrm havirg its prircipar prace of business at ptotno 1222 ri No s.z.zs:raztfutizzrq ain ir,ioi iitliriolso, Jubilee hirrs. Hv,ierabad. 500033. tetangana. iepresented by its partner Sm1. B parvathi, wo g Larsrrm,-N;it"";:ii'y;;;rl'ri soo,j-e1-iui;;;,;;' " "' .,.Respondent Application under section 1i (5) & (6) of the Arbitration and conciriation Act, 1996 praying that the Hon,ble Court may be pleasr:d to appoint a Sole arbitrator for the purpcse of adludication of the disputes that have arisen between Applicant and the Respondents -r to 19 in respect of the ternrs of the Agreement of sale dated 02.12.2019 Counsel for the Applicant : Counsel for the Respc,ndents : The Court made the following Order : Sri V Seetharama Avadhani _ _ - i-_l HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Arbitration App_lication No .309 of 2024 ORDER: 'lhis Application is lilcd Lrndcr Section I I (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Acr, I 996 to appoinl. a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose ol acljudication bf disputes that havq ariscn between the applica.nt and re sponclents in respect of Agreemcnt of sale dated 02. 12.2O1g.

2. Iratcts risirrg to file this applir:ation arc thaL thc applicant agrccd to purchasc flat bcaring l\o. l3l5 at l3rr. floor, under proposecl consLr.ut:tion rn ,,Sahitj,s Nin.tpama,,, with a built up area of 16;55 Sq.vards of un_diviciccl share of lancl in Tcllapur villagc. On 02.12.2O1g, the app)icant ald respondcnts have entcicd irrto r,rn Agreement of _;ir lc, wlterein the respondents undcrtool< to comprrete thr: consrruction within 36 months, with a grace period of 6 mo,tl-rs, however, the construction was not r:ompletecl even afte r graco period.

3. Learnt:d counsel for the applicant has drar.rrn attention of t]'ris Courl to thc r:lause .p,of thc Agrecment dated 02. 12.2|tg, for. rclcrc r.r c<: thc s arrre ts extraclcd hercunder:_ '_P.y^1,ir"* arising betrue_err the parlies hereto wtth respect. t. anu rnatLer unde.r this "gi",.iu"t J, upot, the trtecln[nq consrut,ttt)n n, i,,i.rp,"iotfol, o) or!/ o1 thr c/rrlsr,s lerein, sholt b,.. rc.l.erreci to an arbitrator as "t.o,,"ning \ i : ,, ) p?r .ll1e latu oJ arbi.trat;on, tll.Lich rnag lx: rn l:trce ancl 7,'!,'.:,":,?,'.:...':'.:i^1:',:yu, ,'r .^rltitration u',a"j,,i"li"tio,., 7u, ut, t)1'tposes snaLl De lltld.erabad alone ortrl t.Lte iclttgu.age oJ tn.c proceeditgs, corre-spon.d.ence, ona ii'"' i*rr,i.,.cl slut be in LlrLglish.',

4. I.ea:rLcd counsel for the applicant submlts that in view of the disputc.between thc partics, the appliczutt as pcr cla.use ,p, of the Ag;-ecmcnt ctated 02. 12.2)lg, is,1us6 noLicc <laLed 09.O5.2O23, however, resporrd<:nts did nor reply to the legal noticc date,l Og.OS.2023, for invor:ation of aii.bjtr.:u ton and for appointnt()r I of sokr arbifrator. He nce , thc aplrlicalL lilcd thc present application.

5. This Colrrt on 03,O1.2025, issur:,-l notice to the responclents and permitted the applicant to t.rkc oL.Lt personal noticc on r::spondcnts. Lcarncd counsel for erppJicant filed datr:cl 23.01.2O25, sL:r[ing that noti r:e to t.espondent 14 was scrvcd and notice 1.o responrlcnt Nos.2 I8 was rctunled as ,refused, Nos.l ancl 1 ll tcr to 1i ancl l5 Lo anci notice to respondent llo. 1 9 was returncd as ,unclaimed .

6. Heard learned counscl for thc applicant :rnd none appceircd fo r rcspondcnts. / /

7. Admitledly, the applicant as per clause ,p' of the Agrccmcr.rL dated 02.1.2.2019, issued notice and respondents did not rcplv to the same.

8. Rccorcling the above sul;missions, this Arbitration Application is disposed of and Dr, Justice Shameem Akther, a lormcr .Iudgc of this Court (rcsidcnt of Iriat No.6F, Sixth filoor, tr,11l,f1ir Apartment, Block 1J, Il.No.8-2-269 l3lMF/F-6, P^ad N.r.2, Banjara Hills, Sri Nagar Colony, Hyderabad-34; lo^bilc IIo.8331 998534), 1S appointed as an Arbitrator to a'l-iq-lfli6;.1" thc disputes betwcen the parties. The parties shall anpcar hcfore the Arbitrator, etlor-rg wilh a copy of thi s order. It i., nlrcn 1o thc parties to raisc all Lheir contenlions before the Arbitlator, eLnd thereafter, lhc sole arbitrator shall proceed with thc arbitral proceedings in accorda.nce with law

9. Acrordingly, the Arbil.ration Application is disposed of.

10. Ol^ii.c 1.o communicatc a oopy of [his order to the lcarned A:-'riLrat.r Misccllancous petitions, pcnrling if any, stand closcd. //TRUE coPYII Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR \ To, 'm,ll*an#:i,,:g,mi,,S#flH]:ff SECTION OFFICER fu{:H#Si{,#3%n#:.

2. one cc to sri v seethar 3. Two.cD copies rama Avadhani' Advocate toPUCl I By speciar lvressenger ] HIGH COURT DATED:21 t02t2025 ORDER ARBAPPL.No.309 ot 2024 ( q o o HI rAr€ 03 l,llil il25 f * l-ncso, -:_ 1 ot19e DISPOSING OF THE ARBAPPL : 1