✦ High Court of India · 13 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
2,604 words

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash FIR No. 19912023 dated 2511212023 of P.S Kamatipura L arising out of C C 3/ll) No. 4827 of 2023 on the file of --'he Cou( of The Chief Metropolitan [Vag st'irte at Nampally, Hyderabad against petitir:nerr; herein / Al to 46, as abuse of p"ctxrr;s of law, to meet the ends of justice I.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Smt Rafath Jalra rr '/y'/o Mohammed Shareef D/o Syed lqbal Hussr,rin aged about 43 years, Oc:- Fr: r;ewife, R/o H.No 1B-B-2231 12lcl26l '1 , Habeeh Nagar Rakshapurarr, F iyasath Nagar, Hyderabad PETITIONER/DE-FACTO COMPLAINAT AND

1. The State of Te langana, rep., by its Public Prosecutor High Cc,urt, Hyderabad

2. MRS FAI-ll,/lil BEGUM, Wo Late Mohd Yousfuddin, aged about - 64 years, Occ- Hous;e Wife, R/o 19-1-4361N231'1 , Kamati Pura Osman Bagh, Bahadurpura l-lyderabad-500064

3. MRS SHI\F1EI:N BEGUM, Wo Haji Mohiuddin Shareef, ar;ed about4l years, Occ- House \\rife, R/o 11-2-773, Habeeb Nagar It/allepally, Nampally, Hyderabad- t;,l rOO', .

4. MR HAJI UOt-lUDD|N SHAREEF, S/o Late Rahman Shareef, aged about- 52 years, C)c r:- Private Employee, Rlo 11-2-773, Habeeb Na,3ar, Mallepally, Nampally tlvrl:rabad- 50000'1 , Rept., by his GPA MRS SHAHEEN BEGUM Wo Haji \4oh rcldin Shareef, aged about 41 years, Occ- llouse Wife, R/o 11- 2-773, Habt>et l.lagar, Mallepally, Nampally, Hyderabad- 5,000I1.

5. MRS SHI\EIAl',1A, BEGUM, W/o Mohammed Moin, aged about 46 years, Occ- House Vy'ile F?.lo 17 -2-1136ifu17, Rein Bazar, Yak-rtpura, Charminar, Hyderabad - 5tr0023

6. MR. MOI-lAlVl'/E:D MOIN, S/o Mohammed Sardar, aged about 48 years, Occ- Business tiio 17-2-11361N17, Rein Bazar, '/aku,tpurir, Charminar, Hyderabad - :(,0023.

7. MR. MOHI,[4Nl!-D SHAREEF, S/o Late Rahman Shareef, irged about 38 years, Or;c E;Lrs;iness, No 11-2-773, Habeeb Nagar, Near lVlastana Bangle Store, Namri:lly Hyderabad - 500001. ...RESPON DEhITS/ACCUSED Petition Lrn Jr:r liection 359(2) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\,4,3rrorir rdum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the l-1rgh Court may be pleased to per-rit petitioner to record compromise 1o conrpound all the offences against ,?l the accused persons in FIR No. 19912023 dalttd 25-12-2023 of P,S Kamatiprra arising out of C.0 (S/R) No. 4827 of 11023 on the file of The Court of The Honc-irr e Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally. Hyderabad in interest of justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 3 Petition under Section 359(2) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise to compound the offence against all the accused persons in FIR No. 19912023 dated 2511212023 of p.S Kamatipura arising out of C.0 (S/R) No. 4827 ot 2023 on the fite of The Court of The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad in interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l\ilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Mir Mukarram Ali, Advocate for the Petitioner and mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Mr. A. Narender Yadav, Advocate learned counsel for the Respondent No.2/de-facto complainant. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HC)NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 ln/And (:;I1IMINAL PETITION NO.2953 OF 2025 COMMON ORDEFI This C-irrin;r Petition is filed under Section 528 o1 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,2023 ('for short'BNSS, Il02ii') seeking quashment of ther yl'oceedings against the petitioners in Crimer No.199 of 2023 o'f Kamatipu-ir Police Station, Hyderabad

2. The petitiorrers are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to {i rn the Crime registered for tlre cffences punishable under Sections 11108, 463, 464, 420,417,406, jrl: 506 read with Section 34 of the lndian Penal Code, 1860

3. Heard l,/r lvlir [/lukarram Ali, learned counsel for the oetitioners, Mr.Jithender R,ao r,/eeramalla, learned Additional Public [:,rosecutor, representing the't-,spondent No.1-State and Mr.A.Narendr:r Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/de-facfo complainant

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordinol';, respondent No.2lde-faclo complainant filed l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 rvith the prayer to permit them to enter into c<impromise and by recording tre settlement to quash the proceedings against the _ petitioners/accus,;e,rj in Crime No.199 of 2023. 2 N7 Rrl L,,l.No.c.) and I ol'2025 in/and Cr/.1,. i..:o.29 i ) oJ 2025 \

5. This Court vide orde.r dated 03.03.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 10.03.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace between the pa(ies, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. Sfafe of Punjab and anothe/ and Anil Mishra v. State of tJ-P.z; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3,lhis Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.l528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice. | 2012 (10\ SCC 303 'z 2024 INSC 189 3 2019 (5) scc 688 )J Nr/iJ

1.,1.,\,c') ad ,1 of 202i in/ and 1.r/ t). \0.29 i ) of 2025

8. Accord n;l\,. l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Corsequenfly, all the proceedinqs, in Crime No.'199 of 2023 of Kamatipura Police Station, Hyderabad, itr() he.reby quashed against the petitioner$/ac(.)used Nos. 1to6. I ln the abovr: terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of . Pending rni:;;sl166seu5 applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- t'/OHD.ISMAIL DEPUTV REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIt FICER .l To, 1 2 2 4 5 6 The Chief r\4r:tr:politan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad The station []<>use officer, Kamatipura porice station, lryde rabad District_ One CC to lV r. I\l r lrrlukarram Ali, Advocate tOpUCl One CC to Mr. a. Narender yadav, Advocate [OpUC] Two CCs :o F,u:lic prosecutor, High Court for the Stat€. cf felangana at Hyderabac [r)U't] Two CD Cc pres a*ar$,onn with a C o : y of Joint Memo of Compromise) ,r- A,{ L-"Y \ L .k \ HIGH COURI' \ DATED: 131Ct312025 COMMON OFIDER l.A.Nos.3 anrj 4 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.2953 of 2025 l.A.Nos.3 anri 4 of 2025 ARE DISPOSiED OF THE CRIMIN,AL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF ir; T U 2'l ,lut, Mi \ f, i .\. -ri zri '-' rl1lr ,2' D 'dfl" HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD BETIVEEN CRLP No. of 2025 SMT RAFATH JAHAN W/o Mohammed Shareef D/o Syed Iqbal Hussain, aged aboul 43 y.a;;;- Occ: Housewite, R/o H.No lB_B_223/ef Cl26/1, Habeeb Nagar Rakshapuram, Riyasath Nug..,'Uya".^U.a ... Petitioner/De_facto Complainant

1. The State of Telangana, rep., by its Public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

2. :MRS FATIMA BEGUM W /o Late Mohd yousfuddin, aged_about : 64 years, Occ: House Wif;, R/o 19-1-436 lAl23/1, Kamati pura, Osman t3agh, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad_500064 ---

3. MRS SHAHEEN BEGUM W/o Haji Mohiuddin Shareet aged about 41 years, Occ, fiouse-Wife, R/o tl-2-723, Habeeb Nagar, Mallepjty, Nampally, Hyderabad_ SOO0O1. A

4. MR HAJI MOHIUDDIN SHAREEF =-' S/o Late Rahman Shareef, aged about: 52 years, Occ: Private Employee, n1o lvz_zzS, Habeeb Nagar, Mallepally, Nampally, Hyderabad- 5O0OO1, Rept., by fil" Ci,n MRS SHAHEEN BEGUM W/; Haji Mohiuddin shareef, aged about 41 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o t1-2-723, Habeeb Nagar, Mallepaily, Nampally, Hyderabad_ 5OO0O t.

5. MRS SI{ABANA BEGUM W/o Mohammed Moin, aged about 46 years, Occ: House Wife , R/o 17-2-tt36lAl17, Rein Bazar, Yakutpura, Charminar, Hyderabad _ 500023

6. MR. MOHAMMED MOIN, S/o Mohammed Sardar, aged about 48 years, Occ: BusineSs, R/o t7-2 L136/A/IZ, Rein Bazar, Yakutpura, Charminar, Hyderabad _ 500023. S/-14b4 fr^l^"-^. , fi+ I i n ! 7 Vr:)TAIUMED SHAREEF, 11,1. :/o L ,( Rahman Shareef, aged about 3g.lcars 3l:. l,:,,;i.rrcss, R/o l t 2 7zi, ruru-."JriJ*ril,' t '1,tna .]:. -' - rLr"-t( r lrlcj 500001. ^B^angic Store. Nampa1;, -""' JOINT MEMO . . . Respon den ts/Accused May it plc ar;c. .,,rr-rr Lordship! This is tr b r ng Lo the kind notice of this ljon ,ble Court that petitioncr herei r is the cle_facto complainant ir tn Flli No lssl2023 dared 2s-ri, rr1)23 or , --;";:.:..'i^u'_"'"'"t 4827 ot 2( i,r on,r.tr[':,";;';#-.::1,,:t :j.,::JiJ:; Metropolitrrr \4agistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. Thc petitioner and responden _ i,l,; I 1o 7 Lr, have amicably agree'c to pul an end to the a brvr: -, :.1 i,ned or"tt't Hon,ble cr ur r, ..-rlJ: ;:,3::.:J :.::,,:*lT";;:,::",::: mentioned :. sr. cn the terms and conclitions mentionecl l:t_.1cw: 1. That pr: jliole r at:.rica FIR No. ) (),:t t2a23or'0" t"o unilaterally agreec to rvithdraw the our or c c sr/Rr ." ;::r':,::rZ':: r:,;: :H:'il*ffi: Hon'ble O r,,: . l\,f s6r6politan Magistrale at Nampall_,r, Liyderabad for alleg<:d cr "le nces punishable under 120b, 46.,\, 4()q. .12O, 412, 406, 503, ;()t B/1y 34 156 (3) CrpC against resPonrlent No.2 to 7 in th^r,.^.l. ,.. ,. r-r( (,r rnrs comprornisc entercd belwr.es hr, )arl ics. That Petitic n e r- amicably.and unilaterally agreed lo w thcl:aw/ not press the F:./rre complaint C.C (S/R) No. +SZZ of :2O2il on the file nl Th: I r Hyderaba r :*':r,nsr ..";Y;:'i:':",yf:.I: :,.*I Tffl: compromi;c r._,ttlred between the parties. .blc Chi, That petrti:rie :.:tnci respondent No no t file an y o tL r:r criminal or civ 9t^t1*W 2to CASCS 7 agreecl th.tt tirey wilt against r-ar.h . rt11s1, jn 1, hJr."-.--'. M 2 3 fifi' l{ l! 1i d future claiming or asserting their rights agains[ each other' As such both the parties have got no claim or claims whatsoever against each other, if any claim arises in future it shall be treated as null and void and not binding upon all the parties to this agreement. The parties decided to solve any problem arising between them by putting before elders of both the parties or to refer it to arbitration. 'i

4. That respondent No. 1 agreed to pay Rs I2,OO,OOO I - (Rupees Twelve Lakhs. Only) to party of First Part towards their claim with respect to the share of Late Mohd Moiz Uddin' Thc Petitioner helein along with her children i e , AFREEN SAMEERA' MOHAMMED JUNAlll UDDIN and WASIA SAMtrERA agreed and accepted to receive Rs 12,OO,OOO/- (Rupees TWelve Lakhs Only) towards full and final setllement amount towards the total shareoflateMohdMoizUddin.Thatthepetitionerhereinalong with her children i.e., AFREEN SAMEERA, MOHAMMED JUNAID UDDIN and WASIA SAMtrERA will noL make any claim or claims against respondent No.2 to 7 in whatsoever manner' The Petitioner herein along with her children i e , AFREEN SAMtrERA' MOHAMMED JUNAID UDDIN and WASIA S-AMEERA has relinquished their rights in House property bearing Municipal No' 7g-t-436 I Al 23 / 1 situated at Kamatipura, Outside Doodh Bowli' Hyderabad.

5. That both the parties agreed to get the FIR No l99 12023 dated 25-12-2023 for alleged offences punishable under 120b' 463' 464, 42O, 4r7, 406, sO3, 506 R/w 34 IPC' 156 (3) CrPC compromised before the Hon'ble High Court by filing Quash Petition.

6. That the Petitioner herein along with her children i'e ' AFREEN SAMtrERA, MOHAMMED JUNA{D UDDIN ANd WASIA SAMtrERA WtukarV r:'..''^*py \\ AL & I :l 7 iLg '( c,J lo receive total r3( cr( ing compromise ,*o"' T:: t l ,o th the parties a arnrc rlrJy sertring ;;;;*tt"o rhe Il.)r,ble High court. of Rs 12',oo.o(lc refore the Hon,bre n,*., the time of ",,',r.lt to co-operate \\'itr tter and "r*.rr*,",,,'.;;:t:r:ji# g. T.h.t ,. pcririoncr he"o;- ^, sA\,riEr.o ,onorlll'n alons with her c} rnilcl.c'r i e ' AFRtrElv or-rh:ir rr:gal heirs o,"' "'ot person claimin*,n.0 'ot'o sAMtrERA have, :rr,r. .igr.,,7 ,,j,"1 themshallnot 'i Murrir.i::ri*. ,n-, # ,/. DoojiE}ll',l,ji,,"o",^i!!.o,,.,,",.,u."o;..j"':,:Ij"J:: ';'";:r:o''rgh ';# i'i' along with her chir i e ' AFREEIV uunt o .AMEERA .r Sale Deed h respect to

9. Tha t , I . I,r,i ir ioner h( sAM rrnl. , ,;;^rr:: ackn,,,r r,:cF;es, affirm"'"o "*o'' r;r;; ;;;o-" *. ,, url.^L beari.q rr.r:t No. ,orr\1"nt, dated ;; l;:,;""*' Housc ;,1-,y,,,.,, 0.r.,,,*11'012 Municipal -" ,--:at!) ''ir at K::rnirliprrru, peri.,o rr r hcrein arons ,: :":on ""*,,, ;;;;.7 '\/2:i/t' situated u rd that the , MoH,ll{\rE o rrroro :]:n to rake i,'i rurther r.,l^lo'';;;,;:;ffi;ll rt;H"# in wharsoe.,er ,nanner in respect o'i,.re above 10. l.hat borlr ,he parties sh and cond t o1s of this M '; nt"n"o'"' ,.., ,rTno ";;:1":.::ure o,,rt"idl REDRE.SSAI, nature a n, j II{EMORAA|,D SETTLEI}TE)NI serroUslr.. e! tr:l 1 rzr1y haij be Ii:Lble rc be 1 E all 6dhsrp and rcspc6r o lhe terms MORANDUM OF FAMI LY DISPUTE ISETTLEMEN T AGREEMENT in irs tr : r r,v violation prnt and of the terms and con L-M OF di tion ,; of this FAII4ILY DISPUTE IREDRESSAL ENT in any aspect sh a.ll I ,e dealt has violated the terms; and c.rndition ed in accordance with Ia punish AGREEM 8tx*eib @,w 'T\{,\ Petitioner and respondent no 2 to 7 have amicably se [tled the matter in the light of the terms and conditions mentioned snpra agreed to withdraw FIR No. 199 12023 dated 25 L2-2O23 of P.S Kamatipura arising out of C.C (S/R) No. 4827 of 2023 ot the file o[ The Court of The Hon'ble Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. Therefore it is prayed before this Hon'ble Court to may bc please to record the terms and condition of this Joint Memo and permit us to compromise in accordance to law. :; Hence this memo. 2025 at Hyderabad. Place: Hyderabad Date: -O2-2O25 Stands verihed on this 26Lh Day Of February e9l'99-cP Counsel for PetiLione r Coun Respondents "rtw: SMT RAFATH JAHAN) P R 1 BEGUM}

2. (SHAHEEN BEGUMI 4

3. (HAJI MOH DDIN SHAREEF Rept., by GPA (SHAHEEN BEGTIM) GV.,--

4.(SHAB ANA BEGUM s. (Mo MMED MOINI

6. (Mo ED SHAREEF) SECOND PARTY RESPONDENTS I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments