✦ High Court of India · 03 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,273 words

Acts & Sections

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be i i pleased to issue an apf)ropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [r'landamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the H.No.2-56133/1513211A, in Survey No.1'1l20 (Part), admeasuring 600 sq. yards, (Out of Ac.1-00 Guntas), situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Ra,rga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. Plot being purchased by Mr l\/eka Syam Babu, South. Plot No.'145 and 146, East.30'Ft. Wide Road, West. Neighbours Land., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Ser:tion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 7 to receive the applicatic,n and release the individual service connr:ction to the petitioner, the H. No.2t-56133/1513211A, in Survey No.11l2O (Parl), admeasuring 600 sq. yards, (Out ,tf Ac.1-00 Guntas), situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (l\n), Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North: Plot being purchased by Mr lvleka Syanr Babu; South: Plot No.145 and '146; East: 30'Ft. Wide Road; West: Neighbours i-and. { Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Responrlent No.'t: AGP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY, SC Counsel for the Respon<tent No.8: SRI G. MADHUSUDAN REDDY, SC FOR GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION The Court made the following: ORDER $ ) HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT P TITION No.6064 ot 2025 ORDERI Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader fot' Energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri G. Madhusudan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No.8.

2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of . Writ of Mandamus declaring the actiorr of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitiorters, the H.No.2- 56/331t5132L/A, in Survey No.11/20 (Part), admeasuring 600 sq. yards, (Out of Ac.1.00 guntas) situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State bounded by North: Plot being purchased by Mr. Meka Syam Babu, South : Plot No.145 and 146; East: 30' Ft. Wide Road; West: Neighbours Land., as 2 wP 6064 2025 { illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequenfly direct the to receive application and to release the respondt:nts individual service connection without being influenced by the instnictions of the Bth respondent and to pass...,,.

3. behalf of the petitioners and It is represented by the Iearned counsel appear-ing on the learned :jtanding Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 that the subject issue in the pr,:sent wfit petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 01 .02.2025 passed in W.p. No.3526 of,2025, hence, the present writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order. a

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nosr.2 to 7 brings to the notice of the Court that the petitioners have to file an online application For passing of appropriate ordr:rs. 5 deration: T kin qin a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and, b) The submissions made by both the tearned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the Y \ J wP 6064 2025 learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 7, The Writ petition is disposed of directing the petationers to file an online application seeking electricity service connection to the petitioners, subject premises i.e., the H.No.2.5613.1 /LS/321/A, in Survey No.11l20 (Part), admeasuring 600 Sq. yqrds, (Out of Ac.1.OO guntas) situated at Khanamet Viltage, Serilingamialty Mandal, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State, within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of the Cbpy of the order and upon the petitioners making such online application within the said period as stipulated as above, the-respondent Nos.2 to 7 are directed to consider the said application of the petitioners for retease of the electricity power supply to the petitioners, subject property within a period of one (l) week thereifter. It is however observed that if the respondent Nos.2 to 7 pass orders on petitioners' application granting release of the electricity power sup(y to the petitioners, subject property, the same shall be subject to further direction I I 4 \r'P 6064 2025 i that may be issued by the State of Telangana or the Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated L2.O9.2OL2 passed in Writ Petition No.2O4O7 of 2OO8 and batch. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-K.A MAJI ASSISTANT R GI TRAR SECTION O FTCER s ecreta ri at' r he state To, ,, fi:iffi ld:Hfd#' ""*' : :::::""' Hyderabad Iii J;fff"i zin"-,,,i,.1"''111.Y??3,*'J;J,?il;:1fl '5"J.13:gXX1",:Jil?t'"'t'::ii1ry:' - Distribution, CotnPanY u i chief General *un'n"r.""1""'"'u'' Mint CompoundtT G S P D C L' g{::e r D i s t ri b u'[i o r erera southern Po rver Distribution g"ili ^ Uffi xff [l;:i$l$, 5,1?.,[ ".T; J,.T "fu.!i:[: t-NE) 5. The Divisionar r=ngineel oJ"rairon xonoupurT-GSPDCLI KondaPur T G S P D C 7. The Assistant *=ng'n""i;LioplcHvo East AE oP Allapur TGSPDC L) tlvl 6. The Asst Divisional '*'^J*'t'"ration ;;;;;.:::: " corporation' circre 20 . +*_","#r,;:iJ:,1,."#;* , +*-"r"#[H:fi"lrr*;iT uvoeraua,o '::::'" 10.One CC to Srnt' fhaxi' noopa Singh' Advocale IOPUCI o" "' tt l}$":fftJlif 12.One CC to Sr' N Sreedhar Reddy' SC[OPUC] ,. 14.Twd CD CoPies i"""*'' Hisn court for the state of relangana' at *"oo'' sc for Greater Hvderabad Municipal 3lFr3,,?,1""i.iffi"y;;'o* corporation' circre 20' TJ o-- f -.- I HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:03103/2025 ORDER WP.No.6064 of 2025 1 AE STArA ( ) o 0 I IIAfl 2025 C: ?i.j EO * t" D DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COISTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments