✦ High Court of India · 28 Feb 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Feb 2025
Length
1,229 words

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0r rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of *RIT OF MANDAMUS decraring the action of the respondents in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide for 3 phase Domestic connection, total Domestic Load of 35000 watts vide Reg.No. NRg1524417g633 connection to the petitioner in respect of the property, plot.No.356-8, _in Survey No.205, ** admeasuring 200 Sq Yards, situated at Sri Rama Nagar' SerilingampallY (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District' T'S ' a North Plot No.357 South Plot No'355 East Plot No'329 West 30' And not proriiing elerctricity connection to the above referred pre and arbitrary KondaPur (V)' nd bounded bY Ft. Wide Road. mises as illegal IA NO: 't oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2lo 7 to process the application of the Petitioner to provide for 3 Phase Domestic Connection' total Domestic Load of 35000 watts vide Reg.No. NR915244178633 connection to the petitioner in respect of the property, Plot.No.356-8, in Survey No 205' admeasuring 200 Sq' Yards ' situated at Sri Rama Nagar, Kondapur (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., and bounded by North Plot No'357; South Plot No 355; East Plot No.329; West 30' Ft. Wide Road rr "'J Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s' THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel forthe Respondent No'1: AGP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 7: SRI N'SRE-EDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the ResPondent No'8: SRI B.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER d' .-: (. -, HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA N 7of 5 o DE R: Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counset appearing on behalf of petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, tearned Standing Counsel for TGSpDCL, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri B. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing on behalf of respondent No.g. 2 h as under: r a h u s n r r "...to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide for 3 phase Domestic Connection, total Domestic Load of 35000 watts vide Reg.No.NR91S244t7B633 connection to the petitioner in respect of the property, plot No.356_8, in Survey No.205, admeasuring 200 Sq. yards., situated at Sri Rama Nagar, Kondapur (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., and bounded -t f- ,] 2 SN, J \\1P 6067 2025 South: Plot Wide Road. No.355; East: Plot by North:Plot No'357; And not Providing No.329; West: 30' Ft electricity connection to the above referred premises as illegal a nd arbitrary and pass such this Hon'ble Court maY deem Fit circumstances of the case' " order or ordelrs and proPer in AS It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on 3. behalf of the petitioner that the subject issue in the present Writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated t2.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.4056 of 2O25 and hence' the present writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order. 4, The said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of th(3 petitioner is not disputed by the learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL, appearing on behalf of respondernt Nos' 2 to 7 and thr: learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.B.

5.7 akino into co siderat on: a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and, t ,ir ;,:.:., 3 SN, J wP 6067 2025 b) The submissions put_forth by the learned counse! appearing on beharf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for TGSpDCL, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and the learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing on behalf of respondent No.8, The writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to make a fresh application to the respondents within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order along with all the relevant documents as mandated under the rules and on receipt of such apprication with ail the rerevant documents, the respondents shall consider the request of the petitioner, seeking providing of three(3) phase Domestic connection, totar Domestic Load of 35000 watts vide Reg.No.NRg L52441-7A633 connection to petitioner in respect of the property, plot No.356_8, in Survey No,2O5, admeasuring 2OO Sq. yards., situated at Sri Rama Nagar, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, and pass appropriate orders on the said apptication r 4 i SN, J wP 6c)67 2025 of the petitioner in accordance to taw, preferably within a period of two(2) weeks thereafter. However, there shall be no order as to costs. To, As a s;equel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed. ' //TRUE COPY// SOI-X. SREE RAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ {;=uTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary Power and Energy Department Secretariat' Hyderabad, lState of Telangana-500022

2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Telangana State Southern Power - oiLirioiriioii tJor-panv r-im-i6oiv'ovuth Soudha, Somajiguda' Hvderabad' 3. The Chief General Manager, Commercial Mint Compound' TGSPDCL" Hyderabad

4. The Super ntending Engineer/ Operation/Cybercity Circle' TGSPDCL' CybercitY.

5. The Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, TGSPDCL 6. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur' TGSPDCL 7. The Assistant Engineer, Operation White Field, TGSPDCL S.TheCommissioner,GreaterHyderabadMunicipalCorporation'Circle20' Tank Bund fload, HYderabad.

9. ONC CC tO IT/iS. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, AdVOCAIC [OPUC] 10. One CC to SiRl N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL [(f PUC] 11 . One CC to fiRl B.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] l2.rwoCCstoGPFoRENERGY,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad iOUTI

13.Two CD Copies BSR BS w d t : i i i I I I I i : HIGH COURT DATED:28 lO2l2O25 ri-' i{ ORDER WP.No.6067 of 2025 3 cc TO AYD - $'c- 5,e (-I m1,1B n6

7. ( /'? 31 ,r l\c t Iu 1 l i I I l I i I I i ! i t I I i I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS qo\, l-\ (" Yl.$J

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments