Narsimha fr/urpy DVL v. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Government of Telangana, lnsurance Buildings, Abids
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Having regard to the above made submissi rns and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.p.No.2313g o.' 2025, this Writ 3 Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the…
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or orders more in the nature of Writ of l\ilandamus declare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing and paying the retirement benefits, such as Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs. 13,41,8071 with Token No. 2601072462 Dt. 1410812025, Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs. 2,58,'193/-with Token No. 2691072470 Dt. 14lOBl2O25, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs. 22,88,O971- with Token No. 2601072476 DI. 1410812025, Commutation (CS) amount of Rs. 4,40,280/- with Token No. 2601072482 Dt. 1410812025, EL and HPL amount of Rs. 19,81,050/- with Token No. 2601301459 Dt. 1110912025 and G.P.F. amount of Rs. 11 ,67,9001 with Cheque Dt. 01lOBl2O25, is illegal, unfair, unjust and violation of Articles 14,21 and 300(A) of the Conr; tution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to release the said b rnefits together with interest @ 18% PA on belated payments. lA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci-r _ the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mz l the respondents in not releasing and pay the retirement be I such as, Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs. 13,4'l ,807/- with Tokerr 1410812025, Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs. 2,58,1931 with Tc,l Dt. 1410812025, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs. 22,88,()l 2601072476 Dt. 1410812025, Commutation (CS) amount cf Token No. 2601072482 Dt. 1410812025, EL and HPL amoLr with Token No. 2601301459 Dt. 11/09/2025 and G.P.F. amo.r umstances stated in be pleased to direct :fits of the petitioner No 2601072462 Dt. en No. 2601072470 7/- with Token No. Rs. 4,40,280/- with t of Rs. 19,81,050/- rt of Rs. 1 1,67,900/- with Cheque Dt. 0110812025, pending disposal of the W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. UGENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR SERVICES - lll The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.6O75 of 2026 THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 Between: Narsimha Murthy DVL. AND ...Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Finance Department and others. ...Respondents , ORDER: Heard Sri P.Ugender Reddy, lcarned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleacler for Services-Ill appearing lor the respondents and peruscd the material on record. With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself.
#2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the instant Writ Petition qucstioning the action of the respondents in not releasing thc petitioner,s retiral 2 beneflts, despite token numbers having alreadl been raised by the respondent authorities for payment of the rt rtounts payable to the petitioner.
#3. Learned counsel for the petitioner furtl-rer s ubmits that the lis raised in the present Writ petition ha r already been adjudicated by the Division Bench of his Court in W.P.No.23138 of 2025, which was disposed of r id.e orcler dated O3.O9.2O25, and thus prayed to pass a simit rr orcler in thc present Writ Petition also.
#4. Learned Assistant Government pleader fo- Services-lll did not dispute the submissions made by learned :ounsel lor the petitioner with regard to the disposal of W.p.N,t 23138 of 2025 dated 03.09.2025 and submits that the responc., nts will release the amounts on a priority basis of the toke. numbers and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders.
#5. Having regard to the above made submissi rns and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.p.No.2313g o.' 2025, this Writ 3 Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible, prelerably within a period ol six (6) weeks from today, failing which, the entire amount with regard to the retiral benefits shall carry interest at thc rate of 10% per annum, from the date the amount fell due, till the actual date of rts payment. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Pctition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs SD/- P.PONNA KRISHNt' ASSISTANT REG //TRUE COPY// To
#1. The Principal Secretary, Finance Depart Secretariat, Hyderabad. SECTION OFFICER nt, State of Telangana,
#2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Government of Telangana, lnsurance Buildings, Abids, Hyderabad.
#3. The District Treasury Officer, Jangoan District. 4. The Sub-Treasury Officer, Jangoan, Jangoan Drstrict. 5. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Hyderabad. 6. One CC to SRI P. UGENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Services - lll, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
#8. Two CD Copies MP CC TODAY HIGH COURT DAT iD:2610212026 j I l1All 2026 (:) () ORDER WP.N,r.6075 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE V\ RIT PETITION WI'I HOUT COSTS (D t ?u
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.