The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Respondents No.,lto.4 : Gp FOR BEVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5&6 : Gp tpR !:fOMg Counsel for the Respondgnts No.7 i The Coqrt made the following: ORQER ;, HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5971 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is frled seeking the following relief: "....to issue a Writ, order or direction more partianlarly one in the nature of Wil of Mandamus bg declaring the action of the respond-ent No.3 in issuing Lr.No.B/72/2025 dated 14'2'2025 is iltegal arbitrary uiolatiue of Articles 14, 21 and 3OOA of the India ond consequentlg suspend the Coistitution of Lr.No.B/72/2025 dated 14.2.2025 issued bg the respondent

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record. It is stated that the petitioner is the son of respondent 3. No.7, who is a Senior Citizen. It is further stated that respondent No.7 has hled a petition uide Case No.A/ 11.21 12023 before respondent No.2-the District Collector, under Section 22(2) of the Maintenarce and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2OO7 (for short 'the Act'), seeking eviction of the petitioner from house bearing No.B-3-234/87/8, admeasuring 85 square yard.s, Lakshminarsimha Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, and the sarne was disposed of uide order, dated 11.12.2023 / l I I I I I I I i i l lt' 2 .' directing the petitioner to provide equal accomrnodation to respondent.\o.7 It is further stated that responde nt No.7 frled al applicarion, dated 16.01.2025 before respondcnt No.3_the Revenue Di,zLsional Officer, with a request to implemt,nt the order dated 1t. t1 .2023 passed in Case No.A/ 1 t2t 12023 by respondent lilo.2 and a_lso seeking for police proteclion to take possession ,rf her house, as the petitioner is not allc,wing her to enter the premises; arrd acting on the said application, respondent No.3 issued letter uid.e Lr.No.B /721,.,}O25 dated 14.O2.2O25 rlirecting respondent No.6-SHO, to provide poiice protection frrr taking possession of the subject property as per the order da:r:d 11.11.2023. Hence, this writ petition,

4. Learnec counsel for the petitioner has not clis;puted that the subje<:t pr.operty is self-acquired propert5z of respondent No.7, and berng ltLe son, the petitioner was allowed to enjoy the propert] .

5. If that is the case, there is no dispute that the senior citizen is entitled for hling appropriate applicaticrn seeking eviction of the petitioner from the property in the absence of any documents ex,:cuted in favour of the petitioner if the ,,rpplication frled satis{ies the requirements of Section 23 of the Act. The I t.." I t I 3 respondent No.2 passed order on 11.17.2023 and even after lapse of more than a year, said orders are not given effect, as such the very object of enacting the Act would be defeated.

6. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if the respondents are directed to take steps for implementation of the order dated tl.lt.ZOZS passed by respondent No.2 to provide equal accommodation to respondent No.7 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner fails to do so, respondent No.6 is directed to extend the police protection to respondent No.7, after expiry of the time granted by this Court, for taking necessary steps.

7. , With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PADMANABHA REDDY PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, of Telanoana, Hvderabad. '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariaf Buildings' State 2. The Disfict Colli:ctor, Hyderabad District. 5. iil; R;;;r"-oiui"ionrt'Otficer, Secunoerabad D-ivision,Hyderabad Districl a r'n" fifrsifair. Khairatabad Mandal, Hyderabad District' 5 iil; A;;i.i;ni'commissiqner of Police, Qopalpu-ram Division' E. iii" s["t#']6;;"dn#i,l.'io,6J Hilrs'-e'i,iii5Statien, Hv.derab?d Diskict. ;. ffi-Ce1; sRTRAMACiiNoBA RAo PAlDl, Advocalg.tollg] a. iwo CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Qourt for the state 9t lelaRgana n. l?ltct to Gp FoR HoME, Hish ceurt {or the state of Telangqna a! 10.Two CD Copaes l-lyderabad [OUTI BSK BS w HIGH COURT DATED:2710212025 ORDER WP.No.5971 of 2025 t I r HE SIA rC: ( ?5 o ,,1 \.o, \\l 1 0 Apil 2025 z L) ^\-g a ;o rTC { DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ l1w l#