Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Aug 2004
- Bench
- C V RAMULU
Outcome
Disposed of
The appeal is disposed of as such
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT APPEAL NO : 1261 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 31/12/2003 in WP NO : 14366 OF 2003 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sigireddi Siva Prasada Rao, S/o. Seethayya, Hindu, R/o. Dimili Village, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 Nagireddi Venkata Ramana, S/o. Peda Musalinaidu, Hindu, R/o. Dimili Village, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhaptnam District. 2 Kota Prasada Rao, S/o. Sanyasi, HIndu, R/o. Dimili Village, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhaptnam District. 3 D. Chakra Rao (Election Officer) Hindu, Government High School, Yellamanchili, R/o. Dimili Village, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 The Mandal Development Officer, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5 The District Collector, Visakahapatnam-cum-District Election Authority under A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.S.R.SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.S.RAJAN .....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Respondents 2 and 3: None appeared. Counsel for the Respondents 4 and 5: Govt. Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development. The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER:
Operative part
(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appeal has been rendered infructuous. The appeal is disposed of as such. ___________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ 25-8-2004 _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J To 1 The Mandal Development Officer, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The District Collector, Visakahapatnam-cum-District Election Authority under A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. 3 2 CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is disposed of as such
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 25 Aug 2004. The bench was C V RAMULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.