High Court · 2025

,l . Ahmed Pasha, S/o Abdul Sattar aged about 30 years oCC. Agriculture Ryo dunOti Machahoor village Hathnoora Mandal, Sanga Reddy Dist'. 2. Kulkarni Sharad Kumai, S/o Janneshwar Rao aged about -44 years ucc Agriculture H.No. 2-5011 , Gundla [Vlachnoor village Hathnoora Mandal' sanga Reddv Dist. e iilHli""dtr Rao, S/o Pandu Ranga Rao aged about 40 years, Occ - ,qgri;itrie H.No. )-solt, Gundla lvlactinoor village Hathnoora Mandal, Sanga 4 K. ffidhan Mohan Rao, S/o Sudharshan Rao aged about 33 years Occ -aged about 70 vea.rs occ Asriculture 5. ii: ij;;[ilti;.-Sio k. Harishanker - fi.ruo. 5-84, lsniailkhanpet, Sanga Reddy l\/andql and District' o. k. siir.inp,, 5lo inanesnwar Rio aged about 42.years o-cc Agrilultu.reH.No. - )-50ii , Fy;'cunoti Hllicr'noor villag6 Hathnoora lviandal, Sanga fle.{ov pis! ,^ -D;;h;i;6,, 5lo Veeriiar' aged ab6ut 65 years Occ AgricultureH'No' 3-5213' 7. [,/o Gundla Machnoor village Hathnoora A/andal, Sanga Reddy ulsl' Aoriculture Fl/o Gundla Machnoor village ...PETITIONERS AND

1. 2 3 4

8. The State of Telangana Rep. 9Y its Principal Secretary I AND CAD Deoartment Telanqani Secretariat Hyderabad. Th; District Colleclor, Sanga Reddy District-502 001 . fiie iansitdar, ftathnbora Mandal Sanga Reddv District-502 296 iil 'D;iliy 'Dii'eiioi-o? Ground W5ter, Gpund water department New Collectoiatei, ll Floor Sanga Reddy District-502.001.' M7;-c;;;i;hl Liboratoiies pvt.'t-td., Rep by its- Manas-ins Director' M' irrlirr-rnJ n"aov H.tto. B-3-677t18. ll Floor Sri Krishna Devaraya Nagar, Yellaieddyguda Hyderabad-500 073 sri"tiuoii6dov rl aiiiana Reddy, S/o late Venkata Subba Reddv qgqd €bout OO vlii. bi.ifr,fanarling Oirector frlls Covalent Laboratories P\d. Ltd., H.Ng. 9- 5:oiiii a,liiiii;; s1.i R^-fi4 rava N asa r, Yel lareddvs ud a Hvde rabad- 500 073. trlTi Covatent Laboratories pv1. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director' ttiiayana Reddy Sy.No.374, Gundla Machnoor Village Hathnoora Manoal, Sano'a Reddv District- 502296 iti,"r"rii,i,i'"" siiil Fottriio" controt Board, Regionat office, H.No.5-1-28, Snintiniga"i Sanga Reddy, Sanga Reddy District -502001 ' -Deva ,[Vl' / 6 9. The Member Secretary, Telangana State Pollution Control Board, plot No.A- 3, P.aryava'ra|a Bhavan, Opp.Police Station Main Road , Sanathnagar, Hyderabad-50001 8 ...RESPONDENTS Petition underr Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statr-'d in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a 'A'rit, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lvlandamus declaring to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action agains;t the respondents-s , 6 and I lor violating the T.S. WALTA Act and Rule-22 of :;aid rules and over exploiting the ground water and obtaining the bore water to the 5 , 6 and 7 respondents by way of pipelines is contrary to law and highly improper and consequently direct the respondents-1 to 4 to remove/seize the HDPE lines in the premises of the Factory of the 5 , 6 and 7 respondents lo save the ground water in respect of Gundla Machnoor village, Hathnoor [V'landal, S;anga Reddy District and also declare the aciir)n of the 2, 3 and 4 respondents n not considering and not taking necessary adion pursuant to the representation dated 22- 01-2018 as illegal, arbitrary, un.iust and unreasonable and contrary to Article 14 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents 2,3 and 4 to consider and dispose of the representation dated ',t_2-01-2O18 immediately in the interest of justir;e lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under rlection 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2, 3 & 4 to consider and dispose of the representat4on dated 22-01-2O18 immediately in the interest of justice lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under siection 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents-1 to 4 to immediately stop the misuse of grr:und water by the 5,6 & 7 respon,Jents dury remove/seize the HDpE rines in the premises of G the Factory of the 5 , 6 & 7 respondents in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D. RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&4: GP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMERCIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2&3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI KARTHIK RAMANA PUTTAMREDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 8&9: SRI P. SHIV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6&7: - The Court made the following: ORDER 6 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JI'STICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE J.SREENWAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.6O55 of 2O18 QEDER: (Per tluz Hon'ble Sri Justtce J.Sreeniuas Rao) This vrrit petition is filed for the following relief "..-to issue a Writ, Order or Direction mor,., e:;FteciallA one in the nature of Writ r,tf Mandamus declaing to issue u.tit order ctr dire'ction more porticularlg one in the nature of utnt oJ .Mandamus declaing the action of t,h,"- re-spondents in not taking action against t,t'Lt? reslxtndent Nos.S, 6 and 7 for uiolating t,\,2 T.S.WALTA Act and Ru[e 22 of said rules ond ouer ex:pLctiting the ground u.tater and obtaining the bore- u),2-1er to the 5 6 and 7 respondents bg u.tag of plpelines is contrary to lau and high)g improper orul con.sequently direct the respondent Nos.l to 4 tct re.moue/ seize the HDPE lines in the premises of ttz F.Lctory of the 5 6 and 7 respondents to saue tiTe- qr.uutd u.tater in respect of Gundla Machnoor uillage, Hathnoor Mandal, Sanga Reddg District and al.;ct de'cto.re the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 irt rtct <:onsidertng and not taking necessary actioll pur:;uant to the representation dated 22-01-2018 o:; illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unreasonable arul conirary to Article 14 of the Con-stitution of lndia artct con:;equentlg direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to con:;ider and dispose of the representation datecl 2 2'. 0,1. 2 0 1 8 immediatelg. "

2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2 tl'. \ .) .J Heard learned. Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area DeveloPment DePartment Nos.1 and 4 and learned appearing for resPondent Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.S and 9. 4 Learned Government Pleader sr-bmits that basing the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 22.Ol.2ola, resPondent No.3-Tahsildar and have conducted the other cornpetent authorities enqulry and seized 4 borewells and removed the pipelines through which the water was supplied to the industry of the unoffrcial respondents under cover of panchanama dated 31'O3'2O1a and also imposed penalty to a tune of Rs'2,75,989 /- on each owner'

5. Respondent No'4 liled counter affidavit ' wherein it was specifically stated ttre above facts'

6. Hence, this Cor'rrt is of the view that the grievance of the petitioner raised in the writ petition is redressed and no fu.rther adjudication is required' \

7. a..oriiilgty, this writ petition is closed' No costs' :/ l it' a 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pr:nding if any, shal1 stand closed. //TRUE COPY/I SD/- T.TIRUM ALA DEVI RE GISTRAR ASSI *r(ANr l\r'-- Srcrt ON OFFICER To,

1. ,

3. 4 5 6 Bgi="'3i'*;ilsH#"'nr:"$i's$l#l'J"1"'"'vv"'::''*'ffi E"'"rlxt^?IysJY'Advoc;a'ietoPuc] 1 ?[{gg13i't*a+x'txxCI'1'ff BM HIGH COURT DATED:0710112025 ORDER WP.No.6055 of 2018 ( o e SIr Iq () 3z o .b ? 5 tljl $25 I !-1 o c:'tl. -,t {.l€s,' \*.+_--- CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS J,r ,l / ,o t I !