✦ High Court of India · 29 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
29 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,080 words

1. Smt.Ranjeev Acharya, l.A.S, Principle Secretary to Government, School Education Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, TS., Hyderabad. 2. Sri G.Kishan, l.A.S., Commissioner of School Education and State Project Director, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. Sri Rajesh Rathod, Project Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Adilabad District, Telangana State.

4. Sri Ravi Kanth Rao, Project Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mancherial District, Telangana State. : ...Respondents WRIT PETITION No: 3345 OF 2017 Between: P.Diwa. D/o.Raiendra Kumar, Aged about 28 years, Special Officer, Kasturiba 'Vidyalaya, Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial .District Gandhi Ba ika tiormeiy ni itaOad Dist.)'R/o. Tandur Villag-e and Mandal, Mancherial District ...Petitioner AND 1 The Stale of Telangana, rep. by its Principle Secretary to Govemment, School Ed ucation Departmient, Secretariat, TS., Hyd era bad.

2. The Cornmissioner of School Education and State Project, Director, Sarva Shandsha Abhiyan, Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The Proiect Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Adilabad District, Telangana State

4. The Proiect Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mancherial District, Telangana State. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issrle an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner lo discharge duties as Special officer, KGBV School, Tandur (Village and Mandal) lvlancherial District in the guise of impugned proceedings isstled by the 2nd respondent in Proc.Rc.No.1018/SSA/T9/KGBV/2016 dated 5-10-20'16 directing the petitioner be placed under suspension and the consequential proceed-ings c,fl the 3rd/4th respondent dated 6-10-20'16 as being arbitrary, illegal, unjust, without authority of law motivated and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and to hold that the petitioner is entitled to discharge duties as special officer, KGBV School, Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District with all const>quential benefits including salary due to petitioner from October, 2016. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP.NO: ?379 OF 20171 Between :

1. The Project Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Adilabad District, Telangana State

2. The Project Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mancherial District, Telangana State. ...Petitioners/Respondent No.3 & 4 in WP No.334512017 on the file of High Court AND

1. P.Divya, D/o.Rajendra Kumar, Aged about 28 years, Special Officer, Kasturiba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya, Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District (formerly Adilabad Dist.) R/o. Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District. ...Petitioners in WP 3345 ot 2017 on the file of High Court 2. The State of Telangana; rep. by its Principle Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, TS., Hyderabad.

3. The Commissioner of School Education and State Project, Director, Sarva Shandsha Abhiyan, Telangana, Hyderabad. ....Respondents No.2 & 3 is Formal Party Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Vacate the interim order dated, 01.02-2017.W.P.M.P No. 397712017,W. P. No. 334512017 in the interest of justice. 1A NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may pe pleased to stay all further proceddings pusuant to the revised Show Cause Notice in Rc No.101B/T9/SSA/KGBY/2016 dated 2510512017 issued by the 2nd respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner in WP & CC Counsel for the Respondents in WP & CC : GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : COMMON ORDER : Sri D.Linga Rao IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO w P 3 2 7 AND CONTEMPT CASE No.98O OF 2017 DATE OF ORDER: 29.12'2025 Between: P.Divya AND The State of I'elangana rep' bY its Principle Secretary to Government, School Educal:ion DePartment, Secretariat, TS, Hyderabad and others' ...Petitioner ...Respondents coMMON ORD ER This Vvrit Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to discharge duties as Special Officer, KGB',/ School, Tandur (Village and Mandal)' Mancherial District' in the guise of the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Proc.Rc.No.lO1B/SSA/T9IKGBv/2Ot6, dated 05'10'2016' placing the petitioner under suspension, and the consequential proceedings issued by -t the3'd4thrt:spondentsdated06'10'2016,asillegalandarbitrary'

2. Heard Sri D. Linga Rao, rearned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the orders passed in w.p.M.p.No.3977 of 2ot7 in w.P.No.3345 of 2017, dated ol.o2.2oL7 had been comptied with, and to that effect, he has placed on record written instructions issued vide Rc.No.A1 /2722/2oLg, dated 06.L2.202s. He further submits that no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition. 4- In view of the above submissions, the Writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. In view of the closure of W.P.No.3345 of 20!7, no further orders are required to be passed in this contempt case, and accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. SD/. N. SRIHARI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFTCER To,

1. One CC to SRI D.Linga Rao, Advocate [OpUC] I

2. Two ccs to GP For services l, High court for the State of Telangana' [oUT] 3. Two CD C'rpies SVS/PSL % t ls! .|',..;-M HIGH COI.JRT DATED i2$ll12l2025 ir\ COMMON ORDER WRIT PET'ITON N : 3345 OF 2017, o AND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 980 OF 2017 I I I I 1 :t S () 06 ttB 426 n '- * CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE & WRIT PETITION iI 6 o

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments