✦ High Court of India · 02 May 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 May 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 May 2025
Length
1,232 words

1. Sri Rayani Tirupathi Rayudu, S/o Sri Agriculture bearing H.No.4-146, Prakasam (New Bapatla) District, A.P

2. Sri Mandava Ranga Rao, S/o Sri M Agriculture, Rl/o Cnandalurupadu Vill A.P. Rep. by their DAGPA Holder. M/s partnership firm, Havirlg its office at Street, Czech Colony, Sanathnagar, Rep. by its Managing Partner. Smt. A Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business. Ramulu, Aged about 75 years, Occ. Duddukur Village, lnkollu Mandal, irupathaiah, Aged about 72 yearc, Occ ge, A.S. Pet [Vandal, Nellore District, B Homes (PAN No.ABWFA6669G), a Flat No.505, Bhadra Residency, North yderabad. u Potluri W/o Sri Surya Prasad Nalluru, AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its P Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner and lnspector, Ge Telangana,.Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS ncrpal Secretary Revenue (Stamps and eral of Regrstration and Stamps,

3. The Sub-Registrar, Gandipet, Ranga 4. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy 5. Smt. Vandana Bai, W/o. Sai Kumar, R/o. H.No. 18-'l-29213 and 4/A, Shiv eddy District istrict ged about 35 years Occ. House hold, i Nagar, Uppuguda, Hyderabad. (R5 is impleaded as per C.O.dt. 27.0 2025 in lA No. 2/2025.) ...RESPONOENTS Petition under Article 226 of the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed t topleased to issue any writ order or directi Writ of Mandamus declaring the inactio registering and releasing the Sale Deed p all that the Residential Semi-Finished Flat onstitution of lndia praying that in the erewith, the High Cou( may be pleased n more particularly one in the nature of of the respondent No.3 in receiving, esented by the petitioners in respect of bearing No.'l 01 , in a building known as A2B Homes with columns, roofs and beams, admeasuring 1225 Sq.Feet (including Common Area and Car Parking Space), together with the undivided share of land admeasuring 45 Sq.Yards, (out of total land admeasuring 500 Sq-Yards)., on PIot bearing Nos.192l2iP (North Part) and 19212 (South Part), 166, in Sy.Nos.23611 and 237, situated at Puppalguda Village, Under Manikonda Municipatity, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on the basis of Status Quo order dated 23-12-2021 passed in l.A.No 1 OF 2021 in C.M.A.No.3B3 OF 2021, passed by this Hon'ble Court, wherein this Hon'ble Court passed Status Quo order in respect of restraining the respondents therein or anyone claiming through them from changing the nature of the suit property in O.S.No.541 of 2015 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, and Status Quo order dated 26- 08-2021 passed in l.A.No. 253 OF 2021 in O.S.No. 242 OF 2021, passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, as illegal, arbitrary, non-binding on Petitioners and one wilhout jurisdiction and to consequently direct.the respondent No.3 to receive, register and release the Sale Deed presented by the petitioners in respect of all that the Residential Semi- Finished Flat bearing No.101, in a building known as A2B Homes, with columns, roofs and beams, admeasuring '1225 Sq.Feet (including Common Area and Car Parking Space), together with the undivided share of land admeasuring 45 Sq.Yards, (out of total land admeasuring 500 Sq.yards)., on plot bearing Nos.192/2/P (North Part) And 19212 (South Part), 166, in Sy.Nos.236t1 and 237, situated at Puppalguda Village, Under Manikonda Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districf, without the reference of Status euo order dated 23- 12-2021 passed in lA.No.1 OF 2021 in C.M.A.No.383 OF 2021 , passed by this Hon'ble Court, wherein this Honble Court passed Status euo order in respect of restraining the respondents therein or anyone claiming through them from changtng the nature of the suit property in O.S.No.541 of 20jS on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, and Status euo order dated 26-08-2021 passed in 1.A.No.253 OF 2021 in O.S.No 242 OF 202.1 , passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to receive, register and release the Sale Deed presented by the petitioners in respect of all that the Residential semi- Finished Flat bearing No.'101 , in a building known as A2B Homes, with columns. roofs and beams, admeasuring 1225 Sq.Feet (including Common Area and Car parking Space), together with the undivided share of land admeasuring 45 Sq.yards, (out of total land admeasuring 500 Sq.Yards)., on Plot bearing Nos.192l2/p (North part) & 19212 (South Part), 166, in Sy.Nos.236/1 & 237, situated at puppatguda Viilage, Under [Vlanikonda Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without the reference of Status Quo order dated 23-12-2021 passed in l.A.No.1 OF 2021 in C.M.A.No.3B3 OF 2021, passed by this Hon'ble Court, wherein this Hon,bte Court passed Status Quo order in respect of restraining the respondents therein or anyone claiming through them from changing the nature of the suit property in O.S.No.541 of 20 15 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, and Status Quo order dated 26-08-2021 passed in l.A.No. 253 OF 2021 in O.S.No. 242 OF 20 District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy of the above writ petition 1, passed by the learned V Additional istrict at L.B.Nagar pending disposal Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. KATIKA INDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'t to 4: G REGISTRATION FOR STAMPS AND Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI T. B LA MOHAN REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER tt. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.5842 of 2o25 ORDER: Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners hled a letter dated 22.04.2025 in the Registry, -.eeking permission to withdraw the writ petition

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.S filed a Memo in which he states that the writ petition is filed by suppressing the material facts which amounts to playing fraud on the Court, now by virtue of withdrawal the said contemptuous action, is now trying to be evaded. If this Court permits such withdrawal, the past conduct of petitioners will be repeated by filing fresh writ petitions with different set of facts and further mislead this Court. In such circumstances, requested to record the objections raised by the respondent No..5 for the withdrawal t.il' the present writ petition. I .J I

3. In view of the submissio Writ Petition is dismissed as shall be no order as to costs.

4. Miscellaneouspetitions, Petition shall stand closed. s made by both sides, the thdrawn However, there any, pending in this Writ //TRUE C PYII SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER One CC to SRl. KATIKA RAVINDER One CC to SRI T. BALA MOHAN RE Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies 0 EDDY Advo e [OPUC] Y Advocate [OPUC] EGISTRATION ,High Court for the \ To, 1 2 3 4 KKS TK I t HIGH COURT DATED:0210512025 q J o o k o(( 'i 11: s lA; { ori' Ct,\ 13 rlJB zt[i ,cp,11 q- i \'.-- "1_ ORDER WP.No.S842 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments