Venkateshwar Reddy v. The Government of Telan

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an apprepriate VYldt, Order qr Direction, more parliculady one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declale impugned in-action of the 2nd respondent in considering joint representation dtd.18.09.2024 in so far it relates to the petitioner herein as illegal arbitrary, and discriminatory and consequently direct 2nd respondent to consider joint representation dtd.18.09,2024 in qo far as petitioners case herein is concerned duly obtaining petitioner's option afresh in the vacancies available in Zone-lV and pass appropriate proceedlngs posting the petitioner in the opted vacant place without reference to orders passed in G.O.Ms.No.87 dtd.31 .07.2024, immediately as was done in the case of all thosP perEons who approached this hon'ble Court in various writ petitions. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition und,3r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circun'stances stated in the affidavit filecl n support of the petition, the High Court ma!' be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to take all those immediate necessary Eteps to obtain option from the petitioner afresh in the existing available rracancie$ and to pass appropriate proceedings forthwith withput (eference to G.O.Ms.No,87 dtd.31 .07.2024 as was done in the Case gf all those persqns who approache( this honorable Cou( in various writ petitiong, pending disposal of vrrit petilion. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RAM REDDY counsel for the Respondents: GP FqR SER;YICES-I fhe Court made the following: ORDER Y -rl THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO TP o No F ORDER: Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing for respondent Nos' 1 to 5' I,earned counsel for petitioner sr'rbrnits that petitioner was 2. initially appointed as a Pharmacist Grade-II at PHC, Jaipur in 1986, later PHC, Wankidi, then to Area Hospital, Mahabubabad in 1996 and h 2Cr06, petitioner was tralsferred ald posted to work on the sarne capacity as Pharrnacist Grade-II in Mahathrn3 Galdhi Memorial HosPital, Warangal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further subrnits that as per ttreguidelineNo.T(iv)oftheG.o.Ms.No.80,dated03.o7.2024'the competent authority may obtain up to Iive options of the preferential place of transfers from the employees in the prescribed profoma in Annexure-Il. As such, the respondent No'2 issued orders d'ated' 27.07 -2024, transferring the petitioner to PHC' Geeslkonda, Warangal District and irnmediately, the next day respondent No.2 issued proceed'ings No'ROC'7253/84-ll'E/Z- lV/2024, dated. 28.07.2024 by transferring the petitioner to Kambalpally, Mahabubabad District' Consequently' the petitioner without stating any reasons, obeyed the transfer orders dated 2a.O7.2Cl24 issued by respondent No'2 and joined in the duty at I -,.--{ PHC, Kambalpally, Mahabubabad District and is cont inr.ring, there as of today. : \ tt,4.o9.2024, Learned co unsel for t.l.e petitioner further s,brnits t].at the 4 ' petitioner, along with nine other pharmacists Grade_ll working at different places, were suljscted to transfers without considering prefeiential pla<:.s opted for. They fired a joint representation on 18.09.2024, to modifz the posting orders and approached this Court, challenging the transfer orders. In complianr:e with the orders passe<l b:r, this Court, respondent No.2 issued proceedings in Rc.No.SpL/(ieneral/Tralsfers/2024, directing all the petitioners to appear before him orders were pass,:d in their favour. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that respondent No.2, ought to have considered joint representation dated 18.o9 -2024, wherein the petitioner,s nanne was a-rso included along with other Persons, who approached this Court. Elut, so far, l}re respondenl No.2 has not considered the case ol. the petitioner. 6. Per contrct, learned Government pleader appearing on behalf of respondents sutrrnits tI. at the persons who got order.s in their favour' have appr.ached this court in ti:ne whereas the petitioner did not approach this Court in time. Therefore, the respondent auttrorities ma5r r'3 directed to consider the joint repre sentation arld modified ry T) subrnitted by the petitioner on L8.O9.2O24, and pass appropriate orders in accordalce with Iaw.

7. Having regard to the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either side, without going into the rnerits of the case, . respondent authorities are directed to consider the joint representation submitted by tl.e petitioner on 18.09.2O24 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. With the above direction, ttre Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stald closed. SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 r he p r i n ci p B.R. Ambedkar lelangi Telangana e I s"etel1 1:,rl!d$JFU1,3g?, if Ti'iry:[3:: %T#x]fi I l,',lt

2. The Director of Public Health and Family Welfare' Koti' Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent, MGM Hospital' Warangal' Warangal District' Telangana State The District Medical Health Officer' Mahabubabad Diskict 4 . ^1"L*::::1....' :;tl 3ie'--. F. The Mectical Officer, PHC, Kambalpally, Mahabubabad Distri(;t 6 One CC to SRI K.RAM REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Trlto CCs to GP FOR SERVICES_|, High Court fqr the State of Telangana at l-Jyderabad [,3UT]

8. Two CD Copies BSR BS I I I -u I I ) I HIGH COURT DATED: 2710212025 ----r-Fr }*t-R 7/ , I: \ \ ORDER WP.No.5808 of 2025 F., lttE S Il c. 14: ( C \$( v ,Q il 4 tlAt 2m c t lJr,- St)^ ' '' !-{t1o ,a*. { DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION' WITHOUT COSTS