The High Court · 2025

Petition ttnder Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit liled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all furtrer proceedings of the execution of the Judgment and decree passed in MVOP No. 358 of 2022 (Old MVOP No. 96 of 201B), dated 13.1O.2022, on the file of I r\ddl. District Judge, Hanumakonda pending disposal of the above appeal in the in,:erest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant :SRt KONDADT AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l & 2 : SRt CHOUDAVARAPU LINGA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : ___ The Court delhrered the following: Judgment THE HON'BLE SR.[ JUS TCE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR M. A. {" N{. A._.No.2J9 o.f 2023 JUDGN,f ENT': i-.earneci ci,nrnsei ;rpi:,;'ai'in[ for ihc appe!lant reporled that the rnatter has been relemeci i(-) l'jc Lok Arlaiat constitirted b-v tlie Hi{rh Cour-t Legal Services i-loinnliti"cc, i-li,derabad, fbi settiement, and after due deliberations., riie Lok Adiriat pnssed an award on

13.09.2025 as per tilc tomrs ag;:e.t-.i ui;oi) ri, the par.i-ies.

2. In view o1'the a;irrcsaii: submis:ic,ir, thls i\ppeal is disposed of in ternrs ol'the 3u'ard rla.icci i3.l)'-J.2025 passed by the High Court Legal Scrviccs i- irlnl:ritir.:.j. I..ji', .r;j.ls.

3.. As a setruel. misceilaneoiis; netiiir;iis perrclirrg if any shal! f-'--'-- stands c!osed. 6 SD'- M JAWAHAR REDDY, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- I Additional District Judge, Hanumakonda

2. OnJCb to SRI KONDADI AJAY KUMAR, Advocate IOPUC] 3. One CC to SRt CHOUDAVARAPU LINGA MURTHY, Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CD CoPies ADK \ (Along with a copy of tnk Adalat Award) I l, j HIGH GOIJRT DATED;2ti11012025 JUDGMEilIT MACMA.No.279 of 2023 t TilE S c o !) 't' 2 7 Fi:8 l.th Z * .tf,.",r.i * DISPOSING OF THE MAMCA IN TERMS OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE LOK ADALAT WITHOUT COSTS l'M BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COIAMITTEE (HrGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD) [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, lggl (Centra tAct)l I -09- 25 * HIGH COURT LOK ADAIAT * Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, (Former Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member ._ {.A.C.M.A.No.279 of 2023 (Before the Hon,bte High-tolrt) AGAINST (On the fite of the Chairman, lvlACT-Cum-l 3 District Judge Hanumakonda) 9ETWEEN: Shriram General tnsurance Co. Ltd., Branch Manager, Branch office at ABK Mall,, First Ftoor, Near Hanamkonda Bus depot, Ramnagar, Hanamkonda, warangal city and.District, Rep. by iegat Managlr,'n.r.{o.:-o-s l-i,' qrn Ftoor, Sai Datta Arcade, Street No.6, Himiyat-hnugur, fryd"rrOul. AND ...Appellant/Respondent No.3

1. Dandu Pedda yadagiri @ yadagiri,. s/o. yettaiah, Age 51 years, occ: Agricutture, 2. Dandu Anjamma, w/o. pedda yadagiri e yadagiri, Age 4g years, occ: House hotd, Both are R/o. peddaaphad vittage of Jangaon tr,tanoa[ e oiitrrct, Presentty residing at Hunter Roid, nanarit onou,'wur.ngur District. R/o. Katakova vittage, A,lrnaga;.. fiandai, sr.vup"r District.

3. Gotta Laxmaiah,..s/o. Narayana, Age Major, occ: Driver of the crime vehicle, 4' Dongari Nageshwar, Slo. Veerai;rh, Age Major, Occ: Owner of Crime Vehicte, R /o. H. No. 1 - 12 r 4 r 1 z, venkateshwarj Hug"., xooitu, r.ratgonai oiii.i.i. ...Respondent/petitioners ....Respondents/Respondent No. 1 & 2 ' Counsel for Respondents/Ctaimants/Petitioners : sri M.Anjaiah, Advocate Representative of tnsurance Company counsel for Appettant/rnsurance company : sri K. Ajay Kumar, Advocate Sri Mohammad Babu, Manager -; This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned counsel for the phrties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: AWARD Compensation Awarded by the TribunaL Rs.22,98,000/- (Rupees Twenty-two lakhs ninety eighty thousand onty) with propo.tionate costs and future interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition tiLt the date of reatization from the Respondent Nos.l to 3 jointty and severatly. The rest of the claim of the petitioners is disattowed without costs. t Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok AdaLat. SER HIGH COURT LQK AOAT.AT * Apportiohment Compensation, if any ted by the lfisurance ComPanY aggrieved This is an appeat passed in MV6P No.358 of 2022 (btd MV6P N0.96 of 2018) by the l/rACT- Cum' I Add t. District J udge,' Hanumakonda' sri lvtohammad Babu, Manager for the Appettant-lnsurance company has appeared before the Lok Adatat and represented that the Appettant/Petitioner/ctaimant Nos.1 fu. z have appeared and identified before the District Legat services Authority, Hanumakonda' lt is reported by the Appettant-lnsurance company that during the pendency of this Appeat, both the parties have mutuatty entererJ into a compromise and settted the matter. ln pursuance of the setttemerrt, the Respondents/Petitioners have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.13,50,000/- (Rupees Thirteen takhs fifty thousand onty) towards futt and finat setttement of their ctaim in addition to the amount atready deposited and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same towards futt and final, setttement of the ctaim' Accordingty, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat' ln view of the above said setttement, the lnsurance Company has agreed to deposit the above said amount within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the event of defautt or del'ay in making such deposit' the ctaimants/Appetl,ants are entitted to ctaim interest as awarded by the Tribunal. /Cl,aimant Nos.l & 2 The shal,t be made as per the apportionment determined by the Tribunal in MVOP No.358 of 2022 (Otd MVOP NO'96 of 2018) the AppeLtant/ Petitioner between Additional Direct:ion(s):

1. The Apper.tants/petitioners/ctaimants are entitted to the refund of court Fee paid in this case. z. The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company, if any, shaLl' be given credit to' 3. Soon afte,r deposit by the lnsurance company, the Appettant/Petitioner/ctaimant Nos'1 & 2 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts' ln token ,:f consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counse[ have signed this award in our Presence' ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of. IBP su, n0, /rya^[^-t ) #//0ctu6-A. f*-H we+ IDENTIFICATI ON REPORT i", i r.. ,fi.1;'i,' :''! li' -' No: ryAcm* r-?g i- Ol ro. 3 96 o 2-L o Appellant (s) U-t{o.^IQ^kt b\\ t4 -? '-'1b ots)' pondent (s) / I, ?edrl", d 6>r.ral v?*4o, ,1r1.^^J^l * r-T, For S'riiram G:neial lirsurance Co' L Signato ye*l^*'*; TaJu +r$*.^.-'m8, t /r. Yo."t,'#\l ?8o- tJ.N v?Ur"*., 4Dl To,\ZZ-d) n^^^r!-J F.tJ Da^J* ", ,Ao;$^-'-.'*r Co s Counsel for the R ndent s \ *tt b^-\- IJ*^/tF'5-. T, t?i1e-- SEB, COTJRT HIGH LOK t t Sfate 611 cHATRMAN/SECRETARY DLSA \\ eqot9 (- ,'{/ p,P,na0 LH