High Court · 2025

the affidavit fired in suppor'l vacate the interim orders rj dismiss the writ petition "'RESPoNDENT. 51 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in or,n" petition, the High Court may be pleased to ade in w P No 29565 of 2015 dated 1i.09.2015 and I I Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. ptTTA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Responder counser for the Responr""t'""rt Counsel for the Respondeni Nos. 6to12:_ The Court made the following: ORDER 1'4&5: GP FoR REVENUE t Nos. 2&3: Gp FOR SOCTAL WELFARE -..,4.'-.-+- THE tIOI\I,BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHII{ 1VF5 TPETITIONN o.29565 OF 20L5 OR ER: D This W r: I '( '1tion is fried' under Article 226 of the Con stitutron of lndia, seelrirrq tlLe following relie[: y,i,,i)i;,,, , t t',:!,',rriii,*i{,i,r::1:i;i',"'it|i, i,, :i:i.i,iri," :'ii::' '::i'*:,,:,, : ::1, -"firiSfli;N;":r''':j;' '' t osid" the sdltc . ';;i';";' '

2. Durirrg, 1l'rtdency of this Writ Petition' the petjtion 3r passed away and pe tir r"rer No'Z' wtto is the wife o[ the drrceaserl petitioner' was brougfrt r r record as per interim order' rlar'ed 06 ( 3 2025 in petitionerr;; it' r - I.A.No.1 ot .- (lll : 3. Hea-ci : l1 P'srinivasa Reddy' learned colttt:;t 1 lor the ired Government Pleader for Rever-tue fo - respondent and learned Government Pleadel fol So:ial Welfare Nos.2 and 3 Despite se rvice o[ tlolirc' there is no -,n behalf of respondent Nos b to 1 ' ' Nos. i, 4 llrld : for resPotrrle : represent:a lc l Lee r-t'Le I counsel lbr the petitioners subl nits ilri t pr:rssed away on 27.O1'2023, had lrreft'rr':r petitioner an appeal

4. No. 1, u'h cr bearing (l\'1A ',1o.45 of 2012 before respondent No.3, cLLz llenging the ejectment rr-'l, d21sd O 1.03.2008, passed by th l A11cr,c v Divisional I I / I I I YT 2 Officer, Bhadrachalam, in LTR Possession of the subject land Government. The said 0l .08.201S. Aggrieved Revision Case No.6903 01.09.2015. However no orders have Revision Case so far. Case No.2/VKp/2OOB, whereby was ordered in favour of the appeai was dismissed uzrCe order, dated by the same, the deceased petitioner filed respondent No. 1 of 20lS before been passed in the said Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to to pass appropriate orders within a stipulated direct respondent No. I period of time.

5. Learned Government pleader appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 submits that in view of the interim order passed by this Court on 1I.O9.2O1S, the Revision Casc could not be taken up for hearing. However, t.a.n.d Government pleader submits that respondent No.l will pass appropriate orders, in accordalce with law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and without going into the merits of the case, this Writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 1 to pass appropriate orders in the Revision Case No.69O3 of 2Ollfiled by the deceased petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, after putting the affected parties on notice and providing them an opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible, prelerably within a period of - 3 pli'J I ) !a65 2Ol5 three (3) montlts' tr rm the date of receipt of a copY of this ord:r' Till the disposal c'l ''Lr'' albrementioned Revision Case' th: in terit n order granted t'n 1l'( ' o15 shall continue' Misce]Iztrr.:r: . .] petitions pending, if any, sha] [ stan l closed. There shall Lr,' r LL r , -der as to costs Assrs??N+Jl"',t?[FE ./ \ ,rrRtlE coPY// 'iStiCTli)N OFFICER lfi*il-tls+mruffd$g--fltii court ror the slate :r -'c ansana' at : fliffi"ifi+=ra+eHx' ''nn BM *?.F \ I C(;TODAY HIGH GOUFI.'I DATED:02rc712025 ,1 ' ,// < '' tl.-: ii '- I ). f' Z c"\ i I./ ?$lt ORDER wP.No,291565 0f 2015 DISPOIiII\IG OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOU'T GOSTS ,/:: a) .a -l 7/r /l