✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 29 Jun 2004

E.B. Hospital, Nidubrolu v. GOVERNMENT OF A.P.[1] and in view of the ratio laid down

G ROHINI

Case at a glance

Decided
29 Jun 2004
Bench
G ROHINI

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The Assistant Labour Officer, Ponnur, Guntur Dt. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in…

Judgment

E.B. Hospital, Nidubrolu, rep. by its Administrator, Sri S.P.Abbulu, S/o.Pallaiah, aged 46 years, Salvation Army, Guntur District. AND ..... PETITIONER

1.

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Labour, Employment, Training & Factories Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2.

The Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I Circle, Guntur.

Operative part

3.

The Assistant Labour Officer, Ponnur, Guntur Dt. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring G.O.Ms.No.14, Labour, Employment Training and Factories (Lab.II) Department, dated 11-03- 1996 issued by the 1st respondent as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of Minimum Wages Act. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.M.PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR The Court Made the Following : ORAL ORDER : It is represented by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court reported in A.P. HOSTELS ASSOCIATION v. GOVERNMENT OF A.P.[1] and in view of the ratio laid down in the said decision, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 29th June, 2004. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Labour, Employment, Training & Factories Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I Circle, the Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 , Guntur. 3. The Assistant Labour Officer, Ponnur, Guntur Dt. 4.2CCs to G.P. for Labour, High Court Bldgs., Hyderabad. (OUT) 5.2CD copies [1] 2002(4) ALD 545 (DB)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 226; Minimum Wages Act.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Jun 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments