Malleoallv tVlani Kishore S/o Late lvlr. M Pundarikam' Occupation Business v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt frled therewrth' the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one tn the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second Respondent hereto in not considering the Petrtioners requisition dated 05 08.201 5 while processing the applicationofthethirdRespondentforpermissionforconstructioniSillegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndra, and further direct the second Respondent to consider the Petitioners Requisition dated 05 08.2015 objecting for the construction permission applied by the third Respondent and to give the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing while processing theapplicationofthethirdRespondentforconstruCtionpermissioninPlotNo.ll in Survey No. 1 21 of Tandur Village and lvlandal' Ranga Reddy District l.A. NO: 1 O F 2015(WPMP NO: 38032 O F 2015) Petition under Sectro-r 151 CPC praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled rn support of the petition the High Court may be pleased to direct the secotrd Respondent to consider the Petttioner s Requisitron dated 05082015ob]eCllnqfortheConstrUCtionpertrltssionapplredbythethird Respondent anci to give the' Petrttoner an opportun:ty of heartng while processtng the appltcation of the thlrd Respondent for constructlon permlsslon rn Plot No 11 rn Survey No 121 of Tandur Village and [t'4andal' Ranga Reddy Distrtct' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B'SHASHIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No"l : GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the ResPondents No 2 : SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY' SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the ResPondents No 3 : The Court made the following:ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITI ON No.29339 of2O15 ORDER: This rvrit petirion is liled seeking follou ing rclief "To declare the action of the 2",1 respondent, irt rtot consideing the petitioner's requisitiorL daterT O5.08.2O 1 5, while processing the appticcttion of the 3'd respondent for penrissiott for constructiori, .ls illegal and arbitrary."

2. Heard Sri B. Shashiclhar, learned counscl lor thr: petitioner and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, Icarncd Standing counsel for rcspondenl No.2

3. Learned counsel for the pctitioner submitted that lanci admeasuring Ac.2-00 gts in Sy.No.121, situatcd ar Tandtrr Village and Mandal, Rangareddy District n as purchased b1, pctitioner's family in the name of one of the lamilv members Mr. Mallepally Narsimhulu, ulde regisrered sale cleed bearing document No. l6 of 1979 dated 05.O1.1979; that suit [or partition was filed by pe titioner,s family membcrs uide O.S.No.154 of 2O04, on the file of the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vikarabad and the said suit was settled between the parties and the matter was referred to Lok Adalath and an award dated 13.02.2012 was passed, where urder, petitioner's family got one acrc in Sy.No. 12 i of Tandur l VilL:rqc torl'zrrds lhcir shzrre and lhel' arc in possession and c n.jor rncrrt of 11'rc s:rmt. He furthcr submit[ed lhat respon(ient l.,o i is r irinrinq to lre tlrc ou't'rcr of plot No i 1 in the r-reighboring I r.. oL:t ,rncl lrtt rl lo t'ttt roaclt illto petitir)ner's larld and macle an irl)r)li! irLon Lo tt spollrlt't-rt No.2, seekirlg permissior-r lor L onsl ir.rclion irnrl the ltctiLioncr has submitte<l I'eprescntation c1;rrL rl [) ;.O8.lO I.; to rcspondent No.2. not to process anv iipplicrrti,rn sul,rnittccl tty respondent No.3. []o\\'evel', rt'sprirrrlcnl No..u is proccssing the said application rvithout r onsirli'r'ur11 1l)c rcprcscntzrtion submittcd by Lhe petitioner. ,\qqi rur i r I Ix llrc sir tnr'. l)r('scrnt rvrit petirion is filed. ,1. Lr',rr-r'rccl Slandrng counscl for respondent No.2 u'oulcl sulrnrrl th:r1 sr-rlrsr:qucn1 to filing of u'rit petition, responde nt ho.ii ir:rs itlrcnitlccl plot Nrt.1 I in lavour of Tandur Chcmists and I)r Llgllrsl Asso( ii lion and the said association has approached lcslroncl,'nL No.2 and obtained permission for construction uide lrr-rilclirrg pcrmit orclcr clatcd 28.O4.2018. Hou'eve r, as per his instrlrctions, no c()nstruction has been undertaken and plot is stili vac:rnt and thc time limit stipulated in the permission for corrstru( tiolr has also been elapsed. He further submitted that rl-rc rcspondcr.rt No.2 u,ould consider the representation dated

05.08.2015, submitted by the petitioner, in case any application J submitted by, third partics for permission in respcct of plor No.11, and prayed to pass appropriate orders.

5. Considcring thc submissions advancccl bv Icarned Standing counsel ior rcspondcnt No.2, this Writ I)etition is disposed of, u,ith a drrcction to respondent No.2 to issuc noticc to the petitioner, in case an,y application for cc.rnsrrue tiorr rs made in rcspect ol plot No. 1 1, by rhird parties and aflord ern opportunit)'of hearing and pass appropriatc orclers. Therc shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petiLions pending, if anr,, shall st:rnd closed. SD/.T. SRIN IVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER " rban DeveloPment To, 2 1 The PrinciP al Secretary, Mun icipa I Administratior\ and Department , State Secretanat, Telangana State, The Commissioner, Tandur Municipality' Tandur' R One CC to SRI B SHASHIDHAR, Advocate lOPUCl Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV' High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] a ReddY District 4 3 a 5 One CC to SRI KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA' SC FOR IIUNICIPALITY/MC loPUCl

6. Two CD CoPies BSK BS ft- HIGH COURT DATED:21 11112025 c i:-15 .\ r 6 ) i: _i .'v * 2 3 il,,n 106 s TC * I.F ;: J ORDER WP.No.29339 of 2015 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .\, "9i.p (r\-