Mls. K.S. Tobacco Co. (P) Ltd.,, Representated by its Managing Director v. Krishna Suri, Sio. Manavallaiah, Office at. H.No

Petition under Order V Rule 20 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, thb High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner / appellant to serve the notice in CRP vide CRP No.642 ot 2019 upon respondent No.2 by way of substituted service, by causing advertisement in a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the resfondent no.2 is last known to have actually and voluntarily, carried on business or personally worked for gain (ie., Office at H. No.6-3-1095/96, Ayyappa Temple Street, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad), by fixing the date and time of such appearance of 2nd respondent and for. hearing and determining said CRP. a; I jlni!*rt lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to stay all further proceedings in EA No.24 oI 2014 (Correct E.A. No.28 of 20'14) in E.P. No.3 of 2014 pendinq on the file of the Court of the I Additional District and sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District, at L,B. Nagar. pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 709 OF 2019 Petition under Arlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Docket Order dated 11-12-2018 Passed in E.A.No.44 of 2018.in E.A. No.24 of 2014 (Correct E.A. No.2B of 2014) in E P. No.3 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the lAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at. L.B.Nagar. Between: N.Satyanarayana, S/o. Manikyani, Aged about. nosiness, Proprietor of [t//s. Vin Polymers lnc, Rio Trivenillpartments, Padmaraonagar,Secunderabad. 55 Years, Occupation: Hat No.201 , Gharonda ...Petitioner/Respondent No.'l /Claim Petitioner AND 1 M/s. Mohan Enterprises, Represented by its Proprietor, K. Rama [\4ohan Rao, S/o. Late Venkat Subbaiah, Aged about. 57 Years, R/o. Jammulapalem Village, Tangatoor Mandal, Prakasam District, State of ,Andhla Pradesh. ...Respondent No.1/Petitioner/1"t RespondenUDecree Holder 2 M/s. K.S Tobacco Co (P) Ltd , Representated by its Managing Director, V. Krishna Suri, S/o Manavallaiak Office at..H.No 6-3-1095/96-, Ayyappa Temple Street, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad. ...Respondent No.2/2nd Respondent /Judgment Debtor lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Order V Rule 20 R/w Section 151 CF,C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner to serve the notice in CRp vide CRp No.709 of 2019 upon respondent No.2 by way of substituted service, by causing adve(isement in a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the respondent no.2 is last known to have actually and voluntarily, carried on business or personally worked for gain (ie., Office at H.No.6-3-1095i96, Ayyappa Temple Street, Ral Bhavan Road, Hyderabad), by fixing the dale and time of such appearance of 2nd respondent and for hearing and determinirg said CRP. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 742 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 oI lhe constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Docket Order.dated. 11-12-2018 Passed in E.A.No.4B of 2018 in E.A. No.2B ot 2014 in E.P. No.3 ot 2014 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at. L.B.Nagar. Between: N Satyanarayana, S/o. Manikyam, Aged about 56 Years, Occupation Bq;iness, Proprietor of M/s. Vin Polymers lnc., R/o. Flat No.201, Gharonda Triveni Apartments, Padmaraonagar,Secunderabad. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.1/claim Petitioner AND 1 M/s. Mohan Enterprises,, Represented by its Proprietor, K. Rama Mohan Rao, S/o. Late Venkat Subbaiah, Aged about 57 Years, R/o. Jammulapalem Village, Tangatoor Mandal, Prakasam District, State of Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondent No.1 /Petitioner/1 "t RespondenUDecree Holder 2 M/s. K.S. Tobacco Co. (P) Ltd., Representated by its Managing Director, V. Krishna Suri, S/o. Manavallaiah, Office at H.No.6-3-1095/96, Ayyappa Temple Street, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad. . ...Respondent No.2/2nd Respondent /Judgment Debtor lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Order V Rule 20 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner / appellant to serve the notice in CRP vide CRP No.742 of 2019 upon respondent No.2 by way of substituted service, by causing advertisement in a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the respondent no.2 is last known to have actually and voluntarily, carried on business or personally worked for gain (ie., Office at H. No.6-3-'t 095/96, Ayyappa Temple Street, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad), by fixing the date and time of such appearance of 2nd respondent and for hearing and determining said CRP. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 802 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Docket Orderdated 11-12-2018 Passed in E.A. No.28 of 2014 in E.P. No.3 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at. L.B.Nagar. Between: N. Satyanarayana, S/o. Manikyam, Aged about - 56 Years, Occupation - Business, Proprietor of M/s. Vin Polymers lnc., R/o. Flat No.201, Gharonda Triveni Apartments, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.'l /claim Petitioner AND 1 M/s. Mohan Enterprises, Represented by its Proprietor, K. Rama Mohan Rao, S/o. Late Venkat Subbaiah, Aged about 57 Years, R/o. Jammulapalem Village, Tangatoor Mandal, Prakasam District, State of Andhra Pradesh. ,..Respondent No.1/Petitioner/1"t RespondenUDecree Holder 2 tt//s. K.S. Tobacco Co (P) Ltd., Representated by its Managing Director, V. Krishna Suri, S/o. Manavallaiah, Office at H.No.6-3-'1095/96, Ayyappa Temple Skeet, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad ...Respondent No.2/2nd Respondent /Judgment Debtor lA NO: I OF 2020 Petition under Order V Rule 20 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner / appellant to serve the notice in CRP vide CRP No.B02 of 2019 upon respondent No.2 by way of substituted service, by causing advertisement in a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the respondent no.2 is last known to have actually and voluntarily, carried on business or personally worked for gain (ie., Office at H. No.6-3-1095i96, Ayyappa Temple Street, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad), by fixing the date and time of such appearance of 2nd respondent and for hearing and determinging said CRP. Counsel for the Petitioners in all CRPs : Sri R K Chitta Counsel for the Respondent No.l in all CRPs : Sri M S N Prasad The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I I I I I I THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI C.RP.No s,642,'l 09,742 and 802 of 2019 COMMON ORDER: C.RP.No.642of20lgisfiledbythepetitioneraggrievedbytheorder dated 11.12.2018 passed in E.A.No.43 of 2018 in E.A.No.24 of 2014 (correct E.A.No.28of2014)inE.P.No.3of20l4bytheleamedIAdditionalDistrict& Sessions Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar'

2.C.R.P.No.T0gof20lgisfiledbythepetitioneraggrievedbytheorder dated 11.12.2018 passed in E.A.No.44 of 2018 in E'A'No'24 of 2014 (correct E.A'No.28of2014)inE.P'No.3of2014bytheleamedlAdditionalDistrict& Sessions Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar'

3.C.R.P.No.T42of20lgisfiledbythepetitioneraggrievedbytheorder dated 11.12.2018 passed in E.A.No.48 of 2018 in E'A'No'28 of 2014 in E.P.No.3of20l4bytheleamedIAdditionalDistrict&SessionsJudge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar.

4.C.R.P.No.S02of20lgisfiledbythepetitioneraggrievedbytheorder dated 11.12.2018 passed in E.A.No.28 of 2Ol4 in E'P'No'3 of 2014 by the leamed I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar. I 2 Dr.GR&J crp_642_2019 & batch

5. Heard the lcamed counsel for the petitioner in all the 4 CRPs.

6. Leamed counsel for the petitioner reported that all the four (04) matters would'become iniiuctuous 7 . Recording the said submission of the leamed counsel for the petitioner, it is considered lit kr dismiss all the four (04) CRPs.

8. In the result, all the four (04) Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous No order as to costs As a sequel. miscellaneous applications pending in these petitions, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- T. TIRUMAL OEVI ASSISTANT REGI TRAR SECTION OFFICER To, L.B.Nagar '1 . The I Additional District and Sessions Judge' Ranga Reddy District at' 2. One Cd to sri R K Chitta, Advocate IoPUC] - :. On" CC to Sri lr,4 S N Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies ADK/gh V\_ HIGH COURT DATED:3010112025 COMMON ORDER CRP.Nos.642,709,742 AND 802 ot 2019 q J c o .oY' 21 t4H 2[i5 :l t. t oFspatcvlrp .a' * DISMISSING ALL THE CRPs WITHOUT COSTS (" .qt94 Vr 1((JP: