✦ High Court of India · 24 Feb 2025

Chambati Kondu Ratnam v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,167 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.1 065, in Survey Nos.l 1i33, admeasuring 300 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Taluku, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District' T S ' bounded by North. 30' Road, South Plot No'1068 A' East 30' Road' West' Plot No.1064., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direQt the respondents toreceiveapplicationandtoreleasetheindividualservicQconneclionwithout being influenged by thr: instructions of the'8th respondent' IA O:1OF o25 Petition under Siection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 16s gffidgvit filed in su port of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direqt the Re$pondents ? to 7 to recelve the qBplication and release the indivicual fiervice connection t() the petitioner, the Plot No.1065, in survey Nos 11/33' admeaquring300sqyards,situatedatKhanamet(V)'TalukuRaiendrqNagar' BangaReddyDistrictT.S.,boundedbyNortfr'30'Road;SauthPlqtNol06SA; Ea$t. 39'Roqd;West. Plqt No 1064 .. CounsFl for lhe Petitionqr: SMT' THAKUR RQOPA S|N9H Counse! for the ResPondent Nc'1: AGP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos'2 to 7: SRll'i' SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TG$PDCI" Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI G. tylADHUqySl-lAN RFDDY, SC FOR CNEAiEN HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION The Cqurt made the fbllowing; ORDER #in /|^tt" HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLT NANDA WRIT PETITIO N No.5436 of 2025 ORDER: Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri G. Madhusudan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No.8.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitione2 the Plot No.1065, in Survey Nos.11/33, admeasuring 300 sq yards situated at Khanamet (V), Taluku Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, bounded by North : 30' Road, South: PIot No.1068 A. East: 30' Road; West: PIot No. 1064, as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release 2 wP 5436 2025 individual service connection the instructions influenced bY respondent and to Pass... "- without 8th It is represented by the learned coLlnsel appearing on 3. behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos'2 to 7 that the subject issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 07.02.2025 passed in W'P' No'3526 of 2025' hence, the present writ petition could be disposed of in. terms of the aforesa id order.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 brings to the notice of the Court that the petitioner has to file an online application for passing of a ppropriate orders. 5 Takino into consideration: a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and, b) The submissions made by both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the J wP 5436 2025 learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 7, The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an online application seeking electricity service connection to the petitioner's subject premases I I i.e., Plot No.1O65 in Survey Nos.11133, admeasuring 3OO sq yards situated at Khanamet (V), Taluku Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of the copy of the order and upon the petitioner making such online application within the said period as stiputated as above, the respondent Nos.2 to 7 are directed to consider the said application of the petationer for release of the electricity power supply to the petitioner's subject property within a period of one (1) week thereafter. It is however observed that if the respondent Nos.2 to 7 pass orders on petitioner's application granting release of the electracity power supply to the petitioner's subject property, the same shall be subject to further direction that may be issued by the State of Telangana or the Apex l l r--i 4 M' 5436 2025 r--\ Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated 12.O9.2OL2 passed in Writ Petition No,2O4O7 of 2OO8 and batch. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous appllcations, iF any pending, shall stand closed. SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD AS ts ANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// Hvderabad ECTION OFFICER 'o' , . ,n" Principal Sercretary Power and Energy Department Secretariat Yhe State , relansa.na state southern Power ,r$aerauaa' ' .ii"ri'nqi"a, Flvderabad-500022' ' b ili'[ qt'o" con, p, n v ii'iYt;: Vi;v ;th b"'ld h': sf#a+sd df 2. iil?HY**ri,_lijn1:Ni'J,iJgi"n-j6To"tor 3. 6fii;iG;;;rit vlina[e', commercial Mint compc 4. The Superintenrling Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution ' A;;;;; limit.,o.Viavifn Souona, Somaiisud:r.Hvderabad' s. Ytij'5vi{i,i.iir ?,^bii,"6r.. operation Konda'pur TGSPDC L ;. tii; ffii -Division"at EieiinJ"ibp"tation (ondapur TGSPDoL T The Assistant EnginJ"rlSEiopl6niiie"t AE oP Allaour TGSPDCL B. The Commissioner, Gl;StEr"ti,Od;bad Municipat Corp'oration, Circle 20' - e. O;#'ctt" smt rr iluinoopa Singh Advocate toPuq] ib.i;; dEs'io-cr; tor Eil"rbv'-tiigh c6urt for the state of Telangana' at Hvdeiabad [OUr] 1f . iji,; b.UiJ Sii-r't 12.One CC to 51 c M#;ffirdh;;A"iJv, sc tor creai'er Hyd6rabad Municlpal 'sreeahar Reddy SC for TGSPDCLIoPUCI Tank 6und Road HYderabad CorPdrationlOPUCl

13.Two CD Copies' TJ BSn+* HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:2410212025 ORDER WP.No.5436 of 2025 ( q J 1 $E Sl A rd: $4t{\rB ?6 o +i: i: t rr, -. =' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS L6 \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments