✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 01 Dec 2004

M.Venugopala Reddy being v. The President

G ROHINI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Gulbarga university, Gulbarga Karnataka rep. by its Registrar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction…

Judgment

WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24450 of 2003 Between: M.Venugopala Reddy being represented by GPA holder and father N.Nageswara Reddy s/o. M.V.V. Reddy R/o. L.b.Nagar, Hyderabad. AND ..... PETITIONER

1.

The President, Pharmacy Council of India temple Lane, Kotla Road, P.B. No.7020, New Delhi.

2.

The Registrar, A.P. State Pharmacy Council 21st Century complex, Second Floor Nampally, Hyderabad -500 001.

3.

Vutkoor Laxmaiah college of Pharmacy Raichur, Raichur District, Karnataka.

4.

Gulbarga university, Gulbarga Karnataka rep. by its Registrar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of provisions of Article 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India, the action of the Respondents in not registering the name of the Petitioner as Pharmacist into Register of Pharmacy Council of Andhra Pradesh and issue a consequential direction to the Respondents to register the name of the Petitioner as Registered Pharmacist. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.V.SITARAMAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SMT.N.HEMA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _________

01.12.2004 Note: Issue C.C. in two days. (B/O) To

1. The President, Pharmacy Council of India temple Lane, Kotla Road, P.B. No.7020, New Delhi. 2. The Registrar, A.P. State Pharmacy Council 21st Century complex, Second Floor Nampally, Hyderabad -500 001. 3. Vutkoor Laxmaiah college of Pharmacy Raichur, Raichur District, Karnataka. 4. The Registrar, Gulbarga university, Gulbarga Karnataka.

5.

2CD copies.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19(1)(g), 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 01 Dec 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments