High Court · 2025

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 ot lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction, preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 4thand SthRespondent in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners and threatening to pull down the boundary wall bounding Plot No's.'1 to 26,and trying to dispossess the petitioners from their vacant plot vide Plot No.1 to the extent of 237 Sq. yards, Plot No. 2 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No.3 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 4 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No.S to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 6 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No.7 to the extent of 238 Sq. yards, Plot No. B to the extent of 87 Sq. yards, Plot No'9 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 10 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, PIot No.11 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 12 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards' Plot No.13 to the extent of 140 Sq. yards, Plot No. 14 to the extent of 238 Sq. yards, Plot No.15 to the extent of 231 Sq. yards, Plot No. 16 to the extent of 140 Sq. yards, Plot No.17 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 18 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, PIot No.'19 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 20 to the extent of 139 Sq. yards, Plot No.21 to the extent of 'l 19 Sq. yards, Plot No.22 to the extent of 136 Sq. yards, Plot No.23 to the extent of 155 Sq. yards, Plot No. 24 to the extent of 162 Sq. yards, Plot No.25 to the extent of 180 Sq. yards, Plot No. 26 tqthe extent of 122 Sq. yartls, in Survey No.50, situated at Laxmiguda village, GHMC Rajendranagar circle, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana under GHMC Rajendra nagar Circle - 11, CRZ, GHMC, without following due process of law andthreatening them with dire consequences without any authority or jurisdiction, amd with out following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, and cannot be justified in the eye of law and consequently direct the 4thand SthRespondent not to demolish the boundary wallbounding the Plot No. 1 to 26 and dispossess the petitioners from their vacant plot vide Plot No. '1 to the extent of 237 Sq. yards, PIot No. 2 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 3 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 4 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 5 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 6 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 7 to the extent of 238 Sq. yards, Plot No. 8 to the extent of 87 Sq. yards, Plot No. 9 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 10 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 11 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 12 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 13 to the extent of 140 Sq. yards, ilot No. '14 to the extent of 238 Sq. yards, PIot No. 15 to the extent of 231 Sq. yards, Plot No. '16 to the extent of 140 Sq. yards, Plot No. 17 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. '18 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 1 9 to the extent of 1 32 Sq. yards, Plot No. 20 to the extent of 139 Sq. yards, Plot No. 21 to the extent of 119 Sq. yards, Plot No. 22 to the extent of 136 Sq. yards, Plot No. 23 to the extent of 155 Sq. yards, Plot No. 24 lothe extent of 162 Sq. yards, Plot No. 25 to the extent of 180 Sq. yards, Plot No. 26 to the extent of 122 Sq. yards, without following due process of law, in the interest of justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in-support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th and 5th Respondent not to demolish the boundary wall bounding the Plot No. 1 to 26 and dispossess the petitioners from their vacant plot vide PlotNo.ltotheextentof23TSq.yards,PlotNo2totheextentofl32Sq' yards, Plot No. 3 to the extent of 132 Sq yards, PIot No' 4 to the extent of 1 32 Sq. yards, Plot No. 5 to the extent of 132 Sq' yards' Plot No 6 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 7 to the extent of 238 Sq' yards' Plot No' 8 to the extent of 87 Sq. yards, Plot No. 9 to the extent of 132 Sq yards' Plot No 10 to the extent of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No. 11 to the extent of 132 Sq yards' Plot No 12 1o the extenl of 132 Sq. yards, Plot No: 13 to the extent of 140 Sq yards' Plot No' 14 to the extent of 238 Sq. yards, Plot No' 15 to the extent of 231 Sq yards' Plot No. l6 to the extent of l40 sq. yards, Plot No l T to the extent of l32 Sq yards' PlotNo.lBtotheextentofl32Sq.yards,PlotNo..lgtotheextentofl32Sq. yards,PlotNo.20totheextentof'l39Sqyards'PlotNo2'ltotheextentofll9 Sq. yards, Plot No. 22 to lhe extent of 136 Sq' yards' Plot No 23 to the extent of 155 Sq. yards, Plot No. 24 to the extent of 162 Sq yards' Plot No 25 to the extent of '1 80 Sq. yards, Plot No. 26 to the extent of 122 Sq' yards' without following due process of law, in the interest of justice' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI RAKESH BHUKYA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI.R'VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRt K.RAVINDER REDDY The Court made the following ORDER l l /,/ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITI ON No.5 349 0F 2025 ORDER: Fleard Sri B'Rakesh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Raparthy Venkatesh, leamed Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy, leamed standing counsel appearing for resPondent No-5'

2. The petitioners are 16 in number' They are claiming that they are the absolute owners and possessors of the vacant plots' the details of which are as follows:- Petitioner No. 1 2 2&3 4 5 6 7&8 9 Sale deed No & Date 88412025 Dt.27.01.2025 88s12025 Dr.27.01.2025 88612025 88612025 Dr.21 .0r.2025 88812025 Dt.27.01.2025 88912025 Dt.27.01.2025 89012025 Dt.27.01.2025 89y202s Dt.27.01.2025 89212025 Dt.27.01.2025 9r0/2025 D1.28.O1.2025 Plot No 26 25 1A t4 16 l5 2l 23 13 18 Extent S .yds. 122 180 t62 238 140 ztI 119 155 140 t32 Situated at Laxmiguda Village, GHMC, Rajendranagar circle, Ranga Reddy District. 2 17 12 11 9 10 6 7 19 8 2 1 3 4 20 5 22 132 132 t32 t32 132 t32 238 132 87 132 231 132 132 139 132 136 9t12025 Dt.28.01.2025 t)1212025 Dt.27.01.2025 tt1312025 t)t 27 .01.2025 tt14/2025 D1.28.01.2025 q15t2075 Dt.27.01.2025 91612025 Dt.27 .01.2025 91712025 Dt.28.01.2025 918t2025 D1.28.01.2025 t04612025 DL.3 I .01.2025 104712025 Dt.3 1 .01.2025 1048t2025 Dr.31.01.2025 t(t4912025 Dt.31 .01.2025 1050t2025 Dt.3 1 .01.2025 t()5112025 Dt.3 1.01 .2025 t05212025 Dr.31.01.2025 105312025 Dr.3 i .01 .2025 9 l0 10 11 t2 13 14 l5 15 l5 15 15 l5 15 16 In proof of the same, they have filed copies of the sale deeds. They are in possession of the said property. Vendor of the petitioners has obtained conversion proceedings dated06.12.2024.Even then, on 19-02.2025 at about 1 1 .00 ,,\.M., respondents came to the petitioners' plots and threatened them to demolish and dispossess the petitioners from the strb.ject property and tried to demolish the compound wall constructed ,/ l 3 by their vendor without following due procedure laid down under law. Challenging the said action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5, the petitioners filed the present writ petition.

3. Sri Raparthi Venkatesh, leamed Standing Counsel appearing for 4h respondent and Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy appearing for 5,h respondent, on instructions, would submit that respondent Nos.4 and 5 never tried to dispossess the petitioners from the subject propefty as alleged in the writ affidavit. If there is any violation, they will take action against the petitioners strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down under law.

4. In the light of the same, since the grievance of the petitioners is redressed,, this writ petition is closed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petilion. shall stand closed. SD/.P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// s CTION OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 2. One CC to SRI RAKESH BHUKYA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI K.RAVINDER REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 4. One CC to SRI R.VENKATESH, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD CoPies SA BS w C.G. TODAY ''' -, ,-,\-- | .1 -: I I \ i,.. 24Fih ?ffi HIGH COURT DATED:2010212025 ORDER WP.No.5349 of 2025 CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. €caPC4 ,) ,-\