Saride Kasi Visweswara Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. . Respondent/ Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated therewith, the High Court will be pleased to grant him anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the police in Crime No. 89/2007 of Chagallu Police Station on such terms and conditions as deemed fit. The Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and Grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.Sarva Bhouma Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following ORDER: ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
#1. The SHO, Chagallu Police Station, W.G.District. 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.Hyd(OUT) 3. One CC to Sri K.Sarva Bhouma Rao, Advocate(OPUC) 4. One spare copy. SAH HIGH COURT PSRJ DATED: 31-12-2007 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 7752 OF 2007 ANTICIPATORY BAIL DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 02-01-2008 HIGH COURT PSRJ DATED: 31-12-2007 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 7752 OF 2007 ANTICIPATORY BAIL
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Dec 2007. The bench was P SWAROOP REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.