K. Ashirvadam v. 1. The State of Telangana

2. The District Collector Warangal (Urban), Warangal (Urban) Diskict 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal (Urban) District 4. The Tahsildar, Hasanparthy Mandal. warangal Urban District 5. Sri Poreddy Sammi Reddy, S/o: Malla Reddy, Aged 48_years. Occ: Agrl Rl./o. Nagarbm Mllage, Hasanparthy, Warangal Urban Distrct. .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Certiorari calling for records pe(aining to Memo Rc No 8t2228t2}19, dt:19-06-2020 issued by the respondent No4 and setaside the same and declare the same as illegal. arbitrary and unconsitutional and consequently direct the respondent No 4 to mutate the hnd in the name cf petitioners as per the Sate Certificate vide Dis No 384 dt 3047 2OOl of the 1st Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Warangal. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the cir :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High cc r rt may be pleased to suspend the Memo Rc. No 8/222812019, dt 19-06-2020 iss.r rd by the respondent No 4 by directing the respondent No 4 to lmplement to sale ( ertificate vide Dis No 384. dt.30-07-2007 of the r st Addr Senior civir Judge z r warangar pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt AMBEDKAR DUNNA REpF ESENTING SRI RAMESH CHILLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI RAKESH KUll, tR, AGP FOR REVEN(' : Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI G. ANANDAM The Court made the following: ORDER / 7 THE HONOI'RABLE SRI .IUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL trIRIT PETITIONNo.6585 of20i21 ORDER: calling for This writ petition is fited to issue Writ of Certiorari records pertaining to Memo Rc.No.B/2228/2Ot9, dated lg.06.2O2O, issued by respondent No.4 and to set_aside the same and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional ald consequently to direct respondent No.4 to mutate the land in the name of petitioners as per the SaIe Certificate vide Dis.No.384, dated O3.OZ.2OOZ of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Warangal.

2. Heard Sri Ambedkar Dunna, learned counsel representing Sri Ramesh Chilla, f"*"a counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4.

3. karned counsel for the petitioner wotrld submit that the petitioner is the successful bidder of the auction conducted by the learned I Additional Senior Cirril Judge, 2 Warangal in E.P.No.96/1998 n O.S No.42!t of 1993. Accordingly, as per the orders in E.P. No.96.r 1.998, the petitioner requested the Tahsildar, HasanpartJr r to issue e-pattadar pass book to an extent of Ac.8.O0 5untas in Sy.No.749/B, situated at Nagaram Village ir favor of Sri K.Ashirwadam, son of George. The "ahsildar- respondent No.4 uid.e its memo Rc.No.B/22 2812019, dated 19.O8.2O2O had requested the app ticant to approach the Higher Authority i.e., Revenue )ivisional Officer, Warangal (Urban) District - responden: No.3, to appeal against the individuals, who are h: ding ttre remaining extent i.e., Ac.5.O5 guntas. I hen, the petitioner made a representation dated 15.1'.'.2O2O to respondent Nos.2 to 4, but the respondent I'i rs.2 to 4 have neither taken any action on the represent rtion, nor rejected the same. Hence, he would seel< to pass appropriate direction to the respondent aut: lrities to take action on the representation made by the p etitioner.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant G: rernment Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent I os. 1 to .4 / I / // ./i /i 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 15. 12.2020 was pending for consideration due to Covid- 19 pandarnic restrictions and he would seek direction to the petitioner to make fresh representation to respondent No.3 as per the directions of respondent No.4 ui.d.e Memo Rc.No.B/222812019, dated L9.O8.2O2O and upon frling the same, respondent No.3 shall examine the same and pass appropriate orders.

5. Learned counsel for respondent No.s by filing a memo vide USR No.1O2L32/2O25, dated 17.09.2025 would submit ttrat consistent efforts made by him to lile counter on behalf of respondent No.S went in vain as respondent No.5 did not come forward to cause nece ssary instructions.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and learned counsel for respondent No.S and upon perusal of the material placed before this Court, it is apparent that the petitioner has frled a representation dated

15.L2.2O2O in Covid-19 paldamic. Therefore, this Court 4 deems it appropriate to grant liberty to the p:itioner to file necessar5r application before respondent I,l r.3. Upon filing the same, respondent No.3 is directerl to issue notice to the concerned authorities and granting necessarJr opportunity of hearing to all the pe rties and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordanct: with law as e4peditiously as possible.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed r,f. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaleous applications, if aly, pendi. rg, shall also stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SI) . L. VIJAYA LAXMI TANT REGISTRAR .Nti' iEcTroN oFFlcER \", \)

1. The Secretary Department of Revenue. Secretariat, The { tate of Telangana, Hyderabad

2. Tfie Diskict Collector Warangal (Urban), Warangal (Urbe r 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal (Urban) ulstrl l +. fne finsitOar, Hasanparthy Mandal. warangal U-rban Dir; s. one CC to Sri Rameih ctiilla, Advocate [oPUC] O. i*o CCsio GP for Revenue, High Court for the State oi 7. o'ne CC to Snt. G. ANANDAM, Advocate [oPUCl 8. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad [OUT] ) District 'ict lelangana, at To, TJ Yv- HIGH COURT DATED:1710912025 ORDER WP.No.6585 of 2021 iES I,q 61-i-) ..) 1i ri:t 2026 * * ! .\TCH DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETTTION WITHOUT COSTS $ *P 5*' i I I I I Ii! :ii I