The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings, including th: appearance of the Petitioner/Accused in SC.No.436 of 2022 on the file of the )ourt of the Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the Cases Relating to Atrocities against Women cum-Xlll Additional District d Sessions Judgr:-cum-Xlll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.lltrgar. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2024 BETWEEN: Gali Sujatha Redd Employee, R/o. H. Malkaigiri District y, Wo. Dayakar Reddy, Aged 41 yeart, Occ- Bank No.10-349/A, Vasanthagiri Colony, Ma kajgiri, Medchal ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.2/DEFlt(;TO COMPLAINANT AND 1 Pasupuleti Ranadeep, S/o. Siva Sankar Prasad, Aged 23 years, Occ- _Self Emplbyee, R/o.H.No.1-9-64011, Flal No.203, Sri San1le'etha Enclave, Vidya Nagar, Hyderabad.

2. The State ofTelangana, Rep. State of Telangana, High Cou Chaitanyapuri. ... RESPoI.I DENT/PETITIONER rtB its Public Prosecutor, H igh Court for the uildings, Hyderabad, thfough SHO, P.S., ...RESPONDEN I, RESPONDENT No.1 Petition under Section 359(6) BNSS, praying that irr the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitiorr. the High Court may be pleased to permit the 2nd Respondent to compou'ld the offences in SC.No.436 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the Cases Relating to Atrocities aga nst Women-cum-Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Xlll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, registered U/Se0.376, 420,417 IPC against the Petitioner/Accused by recording the compromise l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 359(2)BNSS, praying that irr the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitiorr the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise by Quashing the pro;eedings against the petitioner/accused in SC.No.436 of 2022 on the file of tht: Court of the Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the Cases Relating 1o Atrocities against Women-cum-Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Xlll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, registered U/Sec.376, 420, 417 lPC. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARI, Advocate for the Petitioner and Assistant Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No. and of Ms. P ROJA, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADISRIf EVI LA.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.2055 of 20i:3 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 432 o'f Cr.P.C. by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings :rgainst him in S.C.No.436 of 2022 on the file of Special Sessions J rdge for Fast Tracking the Cases Relating to Atrocities againsl /Vomen-cum- Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-)lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sectr rn 376, 420, 417 of lPC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appea ring for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that durirrr pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have corncromised the matter, in view of the same they also filed MOU arc Joint Memo Accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the ot'fences

3. Vide order dated 01.05.2025, this Court direc:tcd the parties along with their respective counsel to appezrr before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, F igh Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identific ltion and to submit a report. I I t I i I ( I \ 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 11.06-2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in S.C.No.436 of 2022 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking lhe Cases Relating to Atrocities against Women-cum-Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Xlll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL D PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To, I I

1. The Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the Cases Relating to Atrocities against Women-cum-Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge- cum-Xlll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. The Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri P.S., Rachakonda. 3. One CC to SRI NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARI, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Ms. P.ROJA, Advocate [OPUCI 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana

6. Two CD Copies (Enclosed a Copy of Joint Memo Compromise) MKN/gh HIGH COURT DATED:1110712025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos. 1 AND 2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.2055 of 2023 r'^ L-\ r. T,ht: S i / [iT 7{]75 I I /, ti, ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION \ n IN THE HIGII^gO-URT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Crl.p.No. 2OSS of 2023 Between: I Pasupuleii Ranadeeo- S/o. Siva jsankar prasaa, $;a, Jrs- v9a1s, occ; self bmployee, l_4o;!;rlo. 1.s-64ol 1, Flat No.zos,' ri_n sangeetha Enclave, Vidya Nagar, HyderabaE -1 1. The Sthte of Telarrearra its Pubtic p.o3.""ior, I:t. 9v !g.n !ou1t for the Srate of Telangana, p, itdings, Hydera bad, Il*n ":*l_ mrough SHO, p.S., Chaitanyapuri. ?. qdi Su.lat}ra Reddy, W/o. Dayetkar Reddv. {e;a j{_vea5, occ: Blnk'Empro;;,' """'r, R/o- H.No. lO-349/A, Vasanthlgiri iolonv. Malkqigiri, Medchar Matkqjgiri Si"i.iJi"",, And I ...Petitioner/Accused .... Respondent No. 1 ... Respondent No.2/De_facto Complainant IA MOU AND JOINT MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIO NDENT IDE-FACTO co AIID 1TTIE 2ND l. It 15 Sllbmitted that the petitioner/accused herein flled the above qulsh petition Seeking to quash the proceedings rn SC.No.436 ,of 2022 on the hle of Hon,ble Special Sessions Judge for Fast Trackilg the Cases Relating to Astrocitie agaln st Women-cum-Xlfl Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, /Sec.376, 420 4I7 IPC wherein the petitioner is Metropoli reglstered figured as dccu sed. s ,tt. is frrumUtV submitted that the 2.d Respondent/de_facto , ^ complainarr[ and the petitioner/accused have setfled the disputes a:rricably thi ppetitioner :/accused and the Respondent No.2 have I agreed to settle the present dispute in SC.No.436 of 2022 on the file of Hon,ble Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the Cases W Relating to Atrocities against Women-cum-XIII Adrl tionaL District and Sessions Judge-cum-XIII Additional Metropc itan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L'B'Nagar' register:d U/Sec'376' 42O,417 IPC before this Honble High Court' As s'rch' they have filed the present petition seeking this Hon'ble High t )ourt to record the compromise. The contents mentioned in the sa d compromise petition are true and correct to the best of their l<nowledge and belief. Hence, they are frling the present joint Memo It is therefore prayed that this Honble Courl':lnay be pleased to permit the petitioner/ accused herein to compor -id the offences $/ith the 2nd Respondent/De-facto Complain a nt herein by record.ing compromise and b5' allowing the Crimir ral petition No' 2055 of 2023 filed, by ttre petitioner/accused ag'ainst SIC'No'436 of2o22onthefrieofHon,bleSpecialsession:;JudgeforFast Tracking the Cases Relating to Atrocities against V'omen-cum-Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge-curr - {III Additional :t at I-.B.Nagar, Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy DistI'i r other order or registered U/Sec.376, 42O,477 IPC and pass sur' per in the orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit arrr: circumstances of the case' t 4 Hyderabad, Dt. ?4 .r2.2O24 COUNSE IAl--" FIE PETITIONER 2n(i lespondent/ De-ft cto ComPlainant COUNSEL FOR THE R]YJ(.ONDNgT NO.2 I k-- Hyderabad, Dt. '?4.12.2024 i I I