Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 07 Oct 2004
- Bench
- G BIKSHAPATHY
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ________________ G.BIKSHAPATHY, J Dated 07th October, 2004. YCR/KVRM To 1 The General Manager, Ramagundam Division Area-I, Singareni Colleries Company Ltd., Godavari Khani, Karimnagar Dist. 2 The Managing Director, Singareni colleries company Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the request of the petitioner for the appointment of his adopted son namely Srinivas in a suitable post by considering Petitioner's voluntary retirement which is pending before the Respondents as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to appoint the Petitioner's adopted son namely Srinivas by considering the voluntary retirement of the Petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.ASHOK RAJ (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.SRINIVASAMURTHY The Court made the following:
ORDER:
When the matter reached the board, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present and there is no representation on his behalf.
Operative part
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ________________ G.BIKSHAPATHY, J Dated 07th October, 2004. YCR/KVRM To 1 The General Manager, Ramagundam Division Area-I, Singareni Colleries Company Ltd., Godavari Khani, Karimnagar Dist. 2 The Managing Director, Singareni colleries company Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam Dist.
2 C.D. copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 07 Oct 2004. The bench was G BIKSHAPATHY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.