High Court · 2025

Z. ihe Commiss'ioner of Police, Cyberabad CommissiolerSte, Ily9.eraOaO. a, Mr. tvt.godpathi, Sub-lnspeqtor bf P9lic9, Gachilowli Police Station. +. tne eink-ii/andger, HDFC Bank, Hitech City ll Branch, Madhapur, ' A,AA,-- S. tffiHn( Manager, Corporation Bank, Tarnaka Branch, 12-13-83/33, Street 6. theE;ilf Manag6r, state Bank of Mysore, Kond?p_qr_Bryr1ch, Plot No. 2 and 7. tr//s. Sirisha fLnnJti WToLirigamtirtny, Aged 38-eyars, Ry9 !-.[.Nor 6..-2-9, Plot nb. gb4, Alrushka Tbwers, B6hind RciyalCourt Function Hall, Lakdikapool, HYderabad 3, Opp. Botanicil Gardens Kondapur, Hyderabad-s00 084. # 1 stTamaka, FiYderabad.500 017 ..RESP.NDENT' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that ,in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be : pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Direction or Order more in the nature of Mandamus, a. Quash the letters issued by the Respondent No. 3 to Respondent No. 46, requesting that the bank accounts belonging to the Petitioner No. 1 and 2 be freezed and that the same may be kept secret and confidentiat, on the grounds that it is arbitrary, goes against the principles of natural justice as wett as being in v'ro{ation of the right to a speedy, fair and open trial guaranter3d to the Petitioners under Article 21 and the constitutional right to property,Juaranteed under Article 300 A. t.A. NO: 2oF 'the Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay al further proceredings in cr.No. 149 of 20'.16 of Gachibowli Police station during the pendency of this writ petition and save the petitioners from the constant harassment by the respondent No.3 belng dished out upon on the instructions of petitioners No.i' pending the disposal of the Writ Petition. t.A. NO: 3 0F 2016twPtiP. No: 3344S6p 26tU) Petition under section 151 CPC praytng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4, 5 and 6 to defreeze the petitioners accounts which were frozen consequent to the letters issued by the Respondent No. 3 in cr.No. 149 of 20'16 pending lhe disposal of the Writ petition. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2OI6flUPMP. NO: oF 2016) Petition under Section 151 OPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.S and'6 to permit the petitioners to withdraw Rs. 27,50,000/- (Rupees Twelty Seven Lakhs and Fifly thousands Rupees) towards various expenses incurred by them and repay the money borrowed from friends and family towards meeting the various expenses as follows: a. Rs. 18,00,0001 from account Number 54058148020 maintained wlth respondent No.6' (b) Rs. 5,00,000/- from account Numrcer: 062300301110002 maintained with respondent No.S. (c) Rs. 4,50,000/- frotn account Number: SB 01003370 maintained with respondent No'S " t.A. NO: I OF 2Ol6flUVMP. NO: 5128 gF 2016) Between: Secretariat, HYdenabad. 'l . The State of Telangana, Rep' by its Principal Secre*ary, Department of Home' 2. i#'ffiffiiiiion6ioipbtice, Cvberabad Commissionerate, flrderabad' 5: iiil. M.diiini, Suo-lnspecior bf Police, Gachibowli Police Station' ...PETIT!ONERS' 1?'J'"#"J[11i1%'J AND " ai'r."-rsl-o'cc eusiiesJ'iiEiidCnt of # H.No. 107, Phoenix€, Meenakshi l.Smt.SoujanyaReddyPanuganti,WoYellamelli.s^rinivasReddyAgedabout , ffi rgmna:ei#sn'r:,"v flit::,ru'*##H' iln"s;pff Skylounge, Kfi'anamet, Hyderabad. 500 084. ...RES,ONDENTS/ PETITIONERSMRIT PETITIONERS Hvderabad.

3. The Bank Manager, HDFC Bank, Hitech City ll Branch, Madhapur' +. if,E-dl"iiitanaser, corporarion Bank, Tamaka Branch, 12-13-483/33, street s. tnl-iiiriivrlanLri5i-state eini orMysgre., Kondapur Branch, Prot No. 2 and ;ft ,ry,'.ffi.{ilfl # 1 stTamaka, HYderabad.500 017 ff f:ffi *tTffi#tiflisJdffip,1,iiiri.'#"1r;r'r' Hvderabad' *r+tffi3E3#ror=I3td Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased vacate the interim dated 12{8-2016 in w.P.M.P.NO. 33441 0F 2016 lN w.P.No.27009 oF 2016. Counsel for the Pelitionerc: SRI BOJJA ARJUN REDDY (NO] !RES-E]'IT) ail;;a for the Respondent Nos.l TO 3: SRI R'LAXMIKANTH REDoY' AGP FOR HOME Gounsel forthe Respondent No.S: Ms. V.DYUMANI Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SR! M'VENKAT DIVAKAR Counsel for the ResPondent No'4: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE TIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJT ORDER: This uTrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropriate wtit Ditection ot otder rnore in the nature of Iv{andamus a Quash the letters issued by the Respondent No 3 to Respo.dent No 46 requesting that the bank accouots belonging to the Petitiorrer No 1 and 2be fueezed and that the same may be kepi sectet and confidr:ntial on the grounds that it is a$itrary goes agiast the principles o[ naru ral iustice as well as being in violation of the tight to a speedy-fair and open trial guaranteed to the Petitiones under Article 2i and the constit'rtional right to property guaranteed undet Article 300 A and pass..,,

2. Nonr: appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Hear,J Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Governme:et Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to (r. I t

4. Learrred Assisrant Govemment pleader for Home submits that the direction for freeztng of the petitioner,s account was issued in crnnecrion with Crime No. 149 of 2016. However, after due invesd:3arion, a final report was filed on 31.03 .2023 before the court o[ tre xxv Metropolitan Magistrate, Miyapur, classi&i.g the case as "undetected." consequently, the proceedings initiared 2 dudng the pendency of ttre said crime no ronger sunrive, and therefore, the gqievance raised by the petitioner does not subsist. 5 I have perused the material placed on record. 6' In view of the deveropments reported by the learned Assistant Govemment preader for Home, and inasmuch as the has been crosed by the Investigatrng Agency, nothing further sunrives for adiudicatioa in this marrer. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infnrcnrous. There shafl be no order as ro ltself costs. Miscellaneous Petitions,' p.rrdirrg if any,shall s tand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- A. SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI BOJJA ARJUN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI M.VENKAT DIVAKAR, Advocate IOPUCI 3. Two CCs to GP for HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at 4. One CC to Ms. V.DYUMANI, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies PSK.A4P *@ t { HIGH COURT DATED i12l0gl2025 ORDER WP.No .2'7009 of 2016 S 3 0g ttB 202[ 'i r1tl l! '.i * .':\ '.) r-...1 I L,. i t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS JKS Vrlrlze