High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the actions of Respondents in Rejecting the petitioners Dharani applicationsfor issurance of Patta passbook i.e., (1 ) Dharani Application No.2400121910, dated. 1711112024, rejected vide RC No. Bl29l2O24-84, dated 2911112024, concerning Sy. No.69/5, exlenl 4.22112 acres, (2) Dharani Application No.2400121924, dated 17/1112024, rejected vide RC No. Bl29l2O24-78, dated 2911112024, concerning Sy. No. 78, extent 0.87 acres, and Sy. No.79/1 , extent 3.25 acres, (3) Dharani Application No. 2400'121916, dated. 17111/2024, re.jected vide RC No. 812912024-83' dated 29r1112024, concerning Sy. No. 68/5, extent 0.40 acres, sy. No. 68/2 (part), extent 1.55 acres, and Sy. No. 68/4, extent 1.00 acre, (4) Dharani Application No. 2400121918, dated 1ili112024, rejected vide RC No. Bl29l2o24_ 81 , dated 2911112024, concerning Sy. No. 7412, extent .1 .62 acres, and Sy. No. 75 (part), extent 2.00 acres, (5) Dharani Apprication No. 240012.r902, dated 1711112024, rejected vide RC No. Bl29l2o24-77, dated 2g/1i12024, concerning sy. No. 77 (part), extent 3.'r5 acres, (6) Dharani Application No. 2400121917, dated 1711112024, rejected vide RC No. 8/2912024-82, dated 2g/1112024, concerning Sy. No. 72 (parl), extent 3.BS acres (7) Dharani Application No. 2400121919' dated 17r1112024, rejected vide RC No. 8r29t2024-80, dated 2911112024, concerning Sy. No. 17 (part), extent 3.65 acres, (8) Dharani Application No. 2400121908, dated 17111t2o24, rejected vide RC No. Bt29t2o24_ 85, dated 2911112024. concerning Sy. No. 71 (part), extent 3.10 acres as iilegar arbitrary u nconstitution a l, violation of article 300-4 of constitution of lndia and consequentlyset aside the Rejection memos and also direct the respondents to Re consider petitioners Dharani apprications and rectify the rand records and issue the necessary pattadar passbooks in favor of the petitioners, as per Fire RC No. 4/76/ 1988, datecr 29.o4.1g\g, issued by the Respondent District coilector lA NO: 1 OF 202E Petition undcr Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspension of the rejection memos i.e., (1) Dharani Apprication No. 2400121910, dated. 1711112024, rejected vide RC No. Bt29l2o24-84, dated zgt11t2o24, concerning Sy. No. 69/5, extent 4.221/2 acres, (2) Dharani Application No. 2400121924, dated 1il1112024, rejected vide RC No. Br29r2o24-78, dated 2911112024, concerning Sy. No. 78, extent 0.87 acres, and Sy. No. 79/1, extent 3 25 acres, (3) Dharani Apprication No. 2400121916, dated 12r11t2024, rejected vide RC No. Br29rzo24-83, dated 29111/2024, concerning sy. No. 68/5, extent 0.40 acres, Sy. No. 68/2 (part), extent .l .55 acres, and Sy. No. 68/4, extent .l .00 acre, (4) Dharani Apptication No. 2400i2.1918, dated 17111t2o24, rejected vide RC No. 812912024'81, dated 2911 1t2024, conceming Sy. No. 74t2, extent 1.62 acres, and Sy. No.75 (part), extent 2.00 acres, (5) Dharani Application No. 2400121902, dated 1711112024, rejected vide RC No. 8/2912024-77, dated 2911112024, concerning Sy. No. 77 (part), extent 3.15 acres, (6) Dharani Application No. 2400121917, dated 1711112024, rejected vide RC No. Bl29l2O24- 82, dated 2511112024, concerning Sy. No. 72 (par1), extent 3.85 acres, (7) Dharani Application No. 2400121919, dated 1711112024, reiected vide RC No. E.12912024-80, dated 29/1 112024, concerning Sy. No.77 (parl), extent 3.65 acres, (8) Dharani Application No. 2400121908, dated 17t1112024, rejected vide RC No. Bl29l2O24-85, daled 2911112024, concerning Sy. No. 71.(part), extent 3. 10 acres lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated tn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to Re consider the petitioners Dharani applications and rectify the land records and issue the necessary pattadar passbooks in favour of the petitioners, as per File RC No. A/76/1 988, dated 29.04.1 989, issued by the Respondent District Collector Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NALLAPU MANIDEEP Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLI} SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY II/RIT PETITION No.5426 of 2o25 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ ietition with a liberty to make application on the frle of respondent No.2_ District Collector, Mulugu District for grant of extension of "Ek saal patta" granted in favour of the petitioners.

2. Permission as sought for is accorded.

3. Accordingli,, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, since, the petitioners belong to below poverty line under SC/ST category, if any of the Government Order is in force, respondent No.2 is directed to examine the case of the petitioners and pass appropriate reasonecl orders in accordance with law. No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 2 3 One CC to SRI NALLAPU MANIDEEP Advo Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BIV GJP t^r SD/-V.KAVITHA DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER te of Telangana at HIGH COURT DATED:2410212025 ORDER WP.No.5426 of 2025 1 !l tj :: ;.q lA t 3 2g i{;r 2o2i ( I o' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Y* zn t 2 @