✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Pleasant v. Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad

REGD No. 358 of 1980B SESHASAYANA REDDY2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as

Judgment

Cause title

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not permitting the 2nd petitioner to run D.Ed. Course in English medium pursuant to the permission accorded by the 3rd respondent in F.SRC/NCTE/DED/2005-06/2625, dt. 26.08.2005 and proceedings Rc.No.750/D3/SCERT/2005, dt. 03.10.2005, rejecting the proposals submitted for approval of staff list, as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.47, School Education Department dt. 28.02.2005, apart from being violative of the provisions of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 and the Regulations, violative of the fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 30 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 o approve the staff list submitted by the 2nd petitioner. respondent 2nd Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following :

ORDER:

Operative part

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Date:25th June, 2009. To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK} ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 30, 226; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. REGD No. 358 of 1980). ← Search more judgments