The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the judgment / decree in FCOP.No. 546 of 2017, daled 19-12-2018 on the file of Addl. Family Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI GARAGA GAUTAM KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CIVIL REVISIoN PETITION No.629 0F 2019 ORDER: Pursuant to the request made by the Counsel appearing for both the parties, the inatter was referred to Lok Adalat. On 14. 12.2024 the matter u,as settled before the Lok Adalat and an award was passed by the Lok Adalath. In view ol the above, the C.R.p. is disposed of in terms of the award, dated I4.12.2024, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stancl closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 'ltION OFFICER l To,

1. The Additionat Famity Court, City Civil Court at Hyderabad 2. One CC to SRt SURESH SHtV SAGAR, Advocate'[OpUC] 3. One CC to SRI GARAGA GAUTAM KR|SHNA, Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies IAlong with the Copy of the Award by the Lok Adalat ] AR/sh W I I 7-r. i tt, t: r.tt. I 'lrs HIGH COURT DATED:20101t2025 ORDER CRP.No.629 of 2019 e ) r-r5 S 14 16: p 0 6 Fiil 2it?5 "6 * I;F S|,AT( \i ..r DISPOSING OF THE C.R.P. IN TERMS OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE LOK ADALAT 6 I j, j 1 BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE I FOR THE STATE OF- TEL tion 1 9 of the Lega[ Service ANGANA, HYDERABAD. s Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] 14-12-2024 resent:1,Hon,ble Justice G. Sri Devi, P Ea E * HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT -.1 4, iq, * ol1 (Former Judge of Hon,bte Sigh Court for the State ofTetangana) Chairman

2. Sri Nayakawadi Ramesh, Advocate, Member

3. Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, Member CRP.No.629 of 2019 (Befo re the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST 1.A.No.992 of 2018 (on the rite or the rrff*i#ffi Between:- Petiti oner/Respondent court ar Hyderabad) Res pondent/Petitioners 1 1 Sri Nagu Vidya Sagar, Aged about 55 years, R/o.604, Aga Apartm Abids, Hyderabad. s o N a o u Occ A Pc ent ch ar e Um u Ra ff c H Tra AI La en I rde ba v o o A de R o F ta Nea Br N5 t Na U S dn evl tU 54 e rsa v oN 3 10 r TL v@ an W o ssoA Occ R c V ah f owe A em re L H era o u V d aN ta e P or ef ya ag s oss I c Rani, W/o. Kh ars, Occ: Potic 2 Smt. Kanna Radh Aged about 44 ye wPc 8484, Presently Near City Civil Court, Hyderabad, l!9..601: Aga Apartment, Chirag Ati Lane, Abids, Hyderabad. '1orfi1g at Commissionerate of police, asim Vati (divorce) e Constabte, AWARD The above case between the parties having been referred for determination to the LoK ADALAT and the parties having compromised the case / matter, the foltowing Award is passed in terms of the setttement: The Petitioner/ Respondent-5ri Nagu Vidya sagar atong with his counser sri Akshay Tiwari on behatf of M/s.suresh shiv sagar, Advocate and Respondent No.1 /Petitioner-Smt. Nagu Sridevi @ Vani atong with her counsel have appeared before the Lok Adatat. RtnuS q \ 2 During the pendency of the Civit Revision Petition- both the Petitioner/Respondent No.'l-Sri Nagu Vidya Sagar and Respondent No.1/ Petitioner- agu Sridevi @ Vani have enterild into a settlement and fited Memorandum of S HIGH LOK , Slate signatures of the respective parties on the Memorandum of Compromise uty attested by their respective counset. The Parties have atso affixed rt size photographs on the Memorandum of Compromise 1ot cording to the Memorandum of Compromise, the Respondent l lPetitioner/Wife-Smt. Nagu Sridevi @ Vani, W/o.Nagu Vidya Sagar, has fited the F.C.O.P.No.546 of 2017 on the fite of the Judge, Addt. Famity Court at Hyderabad and the same was attowed by granting decree of divorce dissotving the marriage of the Petitioner and Respondent No.1. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner/ Respondent No.'l / Husband-Sri Nagu Vidya Sagar, has fited lA.No.992 of 2018 in OP.No.546 of 2017 and the same was dismissed without costs. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner/ Respondent No. l/Husband-Sri Nagu Vidya Sagar, has preferred the present Civil Revision Petition. As mentioned in the Memorandum of Compromise, both the Petitioner/ Respondent No.1 /Husband-Sri Nagu Vidya Sagar and Respondent No.1 / Petitioner/Wife-Smt. Nagu Sridevi @ Vani got married long back i.e., on 07-3-1996 and son of the respective parties is now aged about 26 years. According to the terms of settlement, the FCOP was fited by the Respondent No.1/Petitioner against the Peiitioner/ Respondent No.1 on the ground adultery and cruetty, has now withdrawn by the Respondent No1/Petitioner. Now, both the Petitioner/ Respondent No.1-Sri Nagu Vidya Sagar and Respondent No.1/ Petitioner-Smt. Nagu Sridevi @ Varii have settted their disputes and agreed to reunite and [ead a conjugal marita[ ['ife as husband and wife without any further dispute. Accordingty, compromise is recorded and Award is passed as per the terms set out in the Memorandum of Compromise and the parties shatl appear before the Hon'bte Court on the date atready fixed. The said Memorandum of compromise shatl form part of the award. Consequentty, the CRP.No.629 of 2019 stands disposed of as per terms of compromise as stated above. The parties are informed that the court fee, if any, paid on the appeat shatt be refunded. ln token of consent for the above settlement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. Lav-N C,L?. c->1 2"rl I Appellant (s) Respcndent (s) I Jlree a orrl Counsel for the Appellant (s) I TI 47al)4oP* Counsel for the Respondent (s) tlqu" CHAIRMAN MEMBER P-'".5 MEMBER ERS o _. HiGH COURT LOK ADALAT --{ I of the C a. Sate ct 1 tee)