1. A. Amrutha v. 1. The State of Telangana

7. Garshi @ Laxmidevi Srikath, S/o Late G.Narsimha, aged about 38 years, Occ Business Rl/o 2-8, Dhulapalli village Gandimaisamma Dundigal Mandal Medchal-Malkajgiri District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRrr oF ruA {DArvus Decrare the Mutation proceedings 8r4226t2015 dated 211312017 issu:d by the 4th respondent in respect of land in Sy.No. 157,EE/A admeasuring ,\c. 1-20 gts situated at Dhulapally village Gandimaisamma Dundigal Mandar, I\4edchar-Markajgiri district and consequentiar entries made in the revenue r( corcs in favour of the unofficiar respondents if any is iregar, arbitrary, contrz ry lc Telangana Rights in Land and pattadar pasr; book Act, 1 g71 and in vioration of Articres, 14, 300A of the constitution of rndia and set aside the same and corrsequen y direct the respondents 2 to 4 io consider the representatior c f the petitioners dated 611t2O2S. , l.A.NO:1 oF 2025 Petition Urder section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerJ in support of the petition, the High Court ma,/ be pleased to direct the respo rdents 2 to 4 to consider the representation o{ the petitioners dared 61112025 'or i:isuance of e-pattadar pass book in respec- of the rand in sy'No 157lEE, 'admeasuring Ac. 0-20 guntas out of Ac. 1-20 gts situated at Dhulapally viflag,>, Gandimaisamma Dundigar Mandar, Medchar_t,,arkajgiri district pending disposal of fl-re main writ petition. Counsel for the Iretitioners : SRI G.ARUN KUMAR lggryet for the Flespondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRt L.RAVINDER, AGp t:oR REVENUE Counsel for the Fespondent Nos.S lo7 : -- The Court made the following ORDER a HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR R-EDDY WRIT PETITION No.5O65 of2025 I l ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the mutating proceedings No.B/a22612015, datecl 2l'O3'2017 issried by respondent No.4 in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 1.20 guntas in Sy.No.157 lEF,lA, situated at Dhulapaliy Village, Gandimaisamma Dundigal Mandal' Medchal-Malkajgiri District in fauour of unofllcial respondents as illegal' arbitrary and, contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 (for short "the ROR Act' 197 1"1 and consequentiy prayed for other appropria[e reliefs' It is stated that the petitioners' grandfather by name 2. G,Anthaiah was the owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.1.2O guntas in Sy No'i57 ltrlE-lA' situated at Dhulapally Village, Gandimaisamma Dundigal Mandai' Medchal-Malkajgiri District' It is further stated that after the death of their grandfather, the father of the petitioners by name G.Ramachander, and his other two sons have succeeded the said property and since father of the petitioners had passed away, the petitioners are having coparcenary rights over the subject property. The grievance of the petitioners is that -.- 2 CVBR, J Wp 5065 2025 suppressir lg 1he said facts, one G. Narsimha, being the c,lder son of their grandlather with the connivance of ihe revenue au[horitie:, gct mu[ated his name in the revenue reco:-ds ujde proceedings, <lrrted 21.O3.2017. Hence, the writ petition

3. Con: iclered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitir:ners and Sri L.Ravinder, learnerl Arisistant Governnter t f,leader for Revenue appearing for reslrondent Nos.l to 4 arul with their consent this writ petition ir; being disposed o ar the admission stage. In view of thc rrature o[ relief sougi t f,tr in this writ petition, issuance of notice to the unolficial rt spo.rdents is dispensed with.

4. Lea:r ed r:ounsel for the petitioners has submittcd that while mura,i.r11 the name of G.Narsimha, no notice har; been issued eithe r to the father of the petitioners or to the petit oners, who are har ing ,:oparcenary rights.

5. Learn td Assistant Government pleader for Rcvenue appearing fc r th,: respondent authorities has submittr:d that the pattadar p rssSook and title deed has been issui:d to G.Narsimha uide' proceedLngs, dated 2l.O3.2O|Z after following the procedu e Jr.escribed under the provisions of the RoR Act, 3 CVBR, J Wp 5065 2025 197 1. Since no objections have been received from the alleged successors-in-interest of G.Anthaiah or from the petitioners, the Tahsildar mutated the name of the father of the unofficial respondents ie., G.Narsimha.

6. The fact of issuance of notice has been seriously denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating no such notice has been issued before mutating the name of G'Narsimha in the revenue records In view of the above submissions and since it is stated 7. that the petitioners have also made an application under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 requesting to furnish the information relating to the impugned proceedings and the respondents have not furnished any information to enable them to take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be met if respondent No.4 is directed to furnish the copies of the proceedings No.B/ a226 l2Ol5-21 I 0312O17, dated 2l'O3'2017 and also connected record,s as sought for by the petiLioners in their application, dated 13.12.2023, within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' After receipt of the said information, the petitioners are at liberty to I I 4 CVBR, J Wp 5 )65 2025 take apprrtJ ria[r] steps in accordance with law either for r naking applicatlo 1 fol cancellation of pattadar passbook issr.ted in favour of ,3 Narr;imha or approaching the competent ci\ri, Court to avail the lpprropria te remedies as available under la\r,.

8. With .he zLbove observations, this Writ Petition is dir;posed of. There sl.all bc no order as to costs.

9. As a ;ec1uel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stan,l --loscd. To //TRUE COPYII SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR sEcroll oFFtcER

1. The Princip rl S€rcretary, Revenue Department Dr. B.R.Ambedk.ar Secretariat State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. The District Coil,:ctor, Ivledchal-tvlalkajgiri District Office at Keer;ara, Irzledchal- lMalkajgiri D rstrict.

3. The Revenr re Divisional Officer, lrrledchal, Revenue Division. . l.4edchal- Malkajgiri D strict.

4. The Tahslld ar, C;andimaisamma Dundigal lvlandal Medchal-Ma kajgiri District. 5. Two CCs tc GF' FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Te,langana at Hyderabad. [OtJT]

6. One CC to riRI (].ARUN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD C:o ries; SA GJP HIGH COUIRT DATED:201t0212025 ORDER WP.No.506li of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. ...' ( o t \ ? 5 fiA W I ({\ t- .- ii^, J 1,c,