1. Maharaipet Jangaiah v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in tn"1ftil"''t tftd tfrerewltn' the High Court may be pteased ;;;ti*:-ilre particularly one in the nature of writ of to issue a writ' order "t Mandamus declaring tftu in"Ition ot the Rlspondent-No 2 to 5 for not issuing new pattadar passbooks to tneE'.icuituiai tano'ot first Petitioner to the extent of Ac' Shankarpalli Mandal' 2.00 gts in sy No. eoslnn]""ii';ai"J ai 5ongaxal ,village' Ranga Reddy District, ,no"to ire-SeconJ Petitioner.to the extent of Ac' 1 20 gts in Sy No. 363/4 situated ,t ionU"af<aiVillage' Snantarpalli Mandal Ranga Reddv District. is as illegal, ,roitrrrvl'uilfalion oii'tU" 300-A of the Constitution of lndia t, and against ftre : r ncroles of natural Justice and consequr:nt.ly direct to the Respondent Nc lr :' r 5 t3 issue the New pattadar Farsooor,s to thr; 1st petitioner to the extent of Ar: 2 ( r ) ors in sy r.r" soalnn,-rnJ ioiie zno pet tic ner to the extent iltf-l?31" ji,,;;: ]]l"j'r'ih#;;;i';i'i'i""'L"nd assignme;t p-,o.I"IJns, IA NO: oF 2025 1 Petition unrJer Seifn.l:1 CpC praying that in the circurnsiances stated in the affidavit fileC irr s. rDoort of the. petition-,1'h""ffigt Cor.t may be 1:rleased to direct Respondent No '2 i r b -to consider tne nepieientation through onrine Dharani Apptication No. 2a()()1og0oz, oliJ 'ob"-id:ioi+=r"r issuing the New pattadar Passbook to first pr>.iiiorer to-the "rt"niora..-z-.00 gts in sy. No. 363/4A and the Dharani Appricariorr No 24001089e-0, J"i"J i6l.,o-zoz+ for isr;uing the New Pattadar Passboolt h: thr: seco-ncl petitioner to the-extent of Ac 1.2,)gts in Sv. No. 363/A, situated at Fc,,rdakat Viffage, S'h;niarp"ifif, r"O"f, Rangar<:ddy Distrtt, Oy correcting the wronrr,rntrie^s in tnL r"r"nuu-["]Ji. in tn" view of the assignment proceedings vide rrlc 3/3BB/ie85 o"t"o i77o's)isli' Counset for the petitioners: SRl. NALLAMASU KRISHNA FSHTSItEllr?Rex,pronttent Nos.1 to 5: sRt H. soMAtAH EZRA rsHAsrRl AGp Counsel for the Res pr:nclent No.6: -__ The Court made the "()llowing: ORDER ./ ./ / HON'BLE SRT JUSTTCE C'V'BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIO NNo.4977of 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is frled under Article 226 of the Constitutionoflndia,seekingt}refollowingrelief: '...to issue a writ' order or direction' more particularly one in the nature t' *tn li'*""J"t""" ieaarils the inaction of not issuing new pattadar the respondent uos'l ;;;; to the oassbooks to the agricul"t"ti *a tf fT:l f:ti""er "gi"'''" t'' No'363/AA situated at extent of nt"'z oo rvran$al' Ranga Reddv Kondakal Village' """;;# orAc'1'2o to th: District and to the Jil;;u""er :1:nt ;;: ;" :rT:..,.# ;;fl*# S:"ff'""'JiT;, -a or tt'" co""titu tio n or T#'H:""':' Jtil"#' India and against tn"'JJ""'n". of nltur:l Justice and ^"i"il-too consequently o""tt tcr" tilt-l""pot'a"ttt N:":?' t" 5 to issue it the lir. st petitioner to the the New Pattadar ";"J;; to the second extent or Acs 2'0o ;?:; ; ^i;'ioslno "'1t 363/A' in petitioner to tt'" respect with tft" l-"t'a assignment proceedings uide No.B/388/ r,al' dar;d 27 I og I lgg7 and pass"'" 2. Considered the submissions of t]le learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H'Somai ah Ezta Shastri' learned Assistant Government Pelader for Assign'ment appearing for the respondents and with their consent' *O *1 ll being disposed of at the admission stage' I ti i"' t'io gtsl' in "*?'""i l-v'No ition is .nf

3. It I s itated that the petitioners are landl,:)ss poor persons ;ur: they were assigned agricultural lanc]s to an extent of r\:: .2.0O guntas, in Sy.No.363/AA arrd to ern extent of Ac. 1.20 llrrLtas in Sy.No.363/A, situated at li:ondakal Village, Sl-Lzt: karpalli Mandat, Ranga Reddy District., Ln terms of the :c:licy enunciated in G.O.Ms.No.1406. dated 26.O7.195tf Ir. is further stated that since rhe date of assignment uide proceedings No.B/3gg/ 1985, dated 27.O9.199-,, the petitioners have been in possessron and enjoyment rf ttre subject property. The grievarr.ce of the petitioners is that the third parties are disputing the nature and classifk a .iorr of the subject land and claiming the right and entitlenrent over the land which was assign,:d to the petitioner o -- Z',? .Og .lgg7 and they are not allc wi ng the petitioners ri , r .nj()y the subject land.

4. It is t.h e . <:a se of the petitioners that the assignrnent of land was qran _ed in the year 1997, but however no pi,Lttadar passbooks l-LzL.,: been issued in their favour and norv th: third parties with,o -' having any right, are encroaching the r;ubject property. I It is for the petitioners to approach the competent Civil 5. Court seeking for eviction of the third parties' if they are encroaching the property of the petitioners without any right' If the petitioners have violated any terms and conditions of the assignment, the revenue authoritY has the Power to In the absence of anY action initiate aPProPriate action' being initiated bY the revenue authoritY and if the encroachersaremakingeffortstodispossessthepetitioners from the subject land, it is for the petitioners to pursue the remedies available under Iaw before the competent Court against the third Parties'

6. With the above observations' the writ petition is dismissed. No Costs' Asasequel,themiscellaneouspetitionsending'ifany' shall stand closed. / //TRUE COPY// SD/-N. SRIHARI STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to SRl. NALLAMASU KRISHNA Advocate oPUCI Court for the State of Tehngana' 2 Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT 'High {ouTl Two CD CoPies 3 KKS GJP o+p HIGH COURT DATED:1 9102.,t2025 ORDER WP.No.4977 of 2025 2ft1;;+ 1g yr\ 1rsl5 l rrc, . . rr vr-fl \{_L _-.;?. v z o .at t J ok/ DISMISSING ']THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (0$u*