The High Court · 2025

Petition under llection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\rlemorarrdum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash tre Proceedings in C.C. No.2031 of 2023 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Metropolitan ltlagistrate, Malkajigiri IVIedchal District at IMalkajigiri. l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under ljection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including dispense the presence of the petitioners in C.C No.2031 of 2023 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge-Cum-[\/etropolitan Magistrate, Malkajigiri-Medchal District at lt/alkajigiri. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Betwee n: MareddyAnji Reddy, s/o. Mallareddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Retd Employee, rlo.3)-276113155, on Plot No. 55, PB Surya Nagar Colony, Neredmet, Malkzrjigiri, Hyderabad - 500 056 ...RespondenUDefacto-Complai nant AND

1. Mogli Sai Kristrna, S/o. Suresh, age. 28 years, Occ. Employee, Rio 25-40132114, Eas;t Anandbagh, Malkajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 047.

2. Bandari Vishnuvardhan @ Vishnu, S/o.8. Sridhar, Age. 23 years, Photographer, ll/o. Flat No.204, More Super Market Building, Anandbagh, It/al<ajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 047. Occ. East

3. Yatam Jagadish Yadav, S/o. Y.Yadagiri, age.27 years, Occ. Employee, Rl/o. 30-2821283, PB Surya Nagar Colony, Neredmet, IValkajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 056.

4. Pentam Dhanral, S/o. rP. Yadagiri, age. 27 years, Occ. Employee, Rl/o. 30-276113145, P3 Surya Nagar Colony, Neredmet, Malkajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 0s6.

5. Kosoju Vinay @ Dinakar, S/o. K. Balaraj, age.21 years, Occ. Student, Rli o. Plot No.'140, RTO Colony, [Voula-Ali, Hyderabad - 500 040.

6. Pentam Sai Kiri:n, S/o. P. Yadagiri, age. 27 years, Occ. Employee, Rl/o. 30-276113145, P3 Surya Nagar Colony, Neredmet, Malkajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 056 ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 6 7 The State of Telangana,, rep. by its publi Hyderabad. Prosecutor, High Court At ... Res pond e nURes pon de nt Petition under Section 359(6) of BNS stated in the [Vemorandum of Grounds of C be pleased to permit the petitioner/ Respon compromise the matter with the Respondent in C.C.No. 2031 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Malkajigiri, praying that in the circumstances inal Petition, the High Court may ent No.3/ De-facto complainant to No.1 and 6 / Accused No.'l and 6 Principle Junior Civil Judge-cum- alkajigiri-Medchal District. l.A. NO: 2 OF 202s Petition under Section 359 (2) r/w Se underabad.S28 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Me orandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to pe mit the petitioner to compound the proceedings against the petitioners 1 and /Accused A-1 and 4-6 herein in C.C.No.203'1 of 2023 on the file of the princi le J unior Civil Judge-cum-J udicia I First Class Magistrate, at lValkajigiri, Malkaji iri-Medchal District in view of the compromise entered into between the parties. This Petition coming on for hearing, u on perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hea ing the arguments of Sri Dantu Venkata Ramana Sarma, Advocate for the pe itioners and the Sri Jlthender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public prosecutor on b half of the Respondent No.'l and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 and ri Mohammed Saleem, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDIER THE HOI\IOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.1 AN D 2 0F 2025 ln/And CR IMINAL PETITI ON No.2315 OF 2024 COMMON ORD ER: This criminar Petition is fired under section 482 of cr.p.c., seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 in c.c.No.203 1 of 2'023, on the fire of the principar Junior civir Judge- cum-firletropolitan rVr.gistrate, I\4arkajgiri-tr4edchar District at I\4arkajgiri.

2. The petitionerr; are the accused Nos. 1 to 6 in the carendar case registered for the offt-.nce punishable under Section 326 read with section 34 of lndian Penal Code. 3- Heard [\4r. D.V. Ramana Sarma, rearned counser for the petitioners, Mr.Jithender Rao ! eeramaila, rearned Additionar pubric prosecutor, representing the res;pondent No.1-state and Mr.tVlohammad Saleem, learned counsel for th e respondent No.3ide-facto complainant.

4. Pending this pe,tition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, thev moved l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the setflement to quash the proceedinr)s against the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 6 in C.C.No.203't of 2023. 2

5. This Court vide order dated 30.0 .2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee or identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted rep rt dated 18.07.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their r spective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity C rds and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise.

6. lhave considered the submissi ns of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record

7. Having considered the allegations , the charged offence and taking into account the amicable settlement bf tween the pa(ies and to restore peace among them, in the light of the dil ctums in Gian Singh v. State of Puniab and anothe/ and Anit Misl tra v. State of ll.P.2; Sfafe of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Urrry", ) nd others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the i mpugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction rnder Section 482 Cr.P.C.l52B of BNSS,2023, would be in,the interest of j! rstice. J B. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2l )25 are allowed. Consequently, all proceedings in C.C.No.2031 of 20 23, on the file of the learned ' 2o1z (1o) scc 303 ' 2oz4 INSC 189 r 2ors 1sy scc ooa 3 Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-[Vetropolitan ltlagistrate, ttlalkajgiri- t\tledchal District at tt/alkajgiri, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accuseC Nos. 1 to 6.

9. ln the above, terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of Pending mis,cellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSI TANT REGISTRAR ,tit U SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Principal Ju rior Civil Judge-cum-[/etropolitan [\/agistrate, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Malkajgiri.

2. The Station House Officer, IValkajgiri Police Station, Rachakonda. 3. Two CCs to the Dublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OU.--]

4. One CC to Sri Dantu Venkata Ramana Sarma, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri [Vohammed Saleem, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies NVB,&am HIGH COURT DATED:221071,2025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 And 2 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.2315 of 2024 5; -TA f " r.j\i + ,.) )./, 25 AUE 2$6 : ,t t t) ,,.tr-'r-'--l DISPOSING THE CRLP AND ALLOWING THE lA.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2025 8 \* ./ RP IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGA A AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. 2315 of 2 24 Between: l.Mogli Sai Krishna s/o. Suresh, age: 28 years, OcJ: Employee, r/o.25-4O/32l14, East Anand Malkajigiri, Hyderabad - 5OO O47 '

2.Bandari Vishnuvardhan @ Vishnu s/o'B' Sridha Age: 23 years, Occ: Photographer, r/o' flat No M-ore Super Market Building, East Anandbagh, Malkajigiri, HYderabad - 500 047' agh, 204,

3. Yatam'Jagadish Yadav s/o. Y' Yadagiri; age: 2 Occ: EmploY ee, r/o. 30-2821283, PB SurYa N I Neredmet, Malkajigiri, HYderabad 500 056. years, ar Colony,

4.Pentam Dhanraj S/o' P. Yadagiri, age" 27 Yea Occ: Employee, rlo. 30-276/ 13/45, PB Surya Neredmet, Malkajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 056' agar Colony,

5.Kosoju Vinay @ Dinakar S/o. K' Balaraj, age: Occ: Student, r/o. Plot No. 140, RTC Colony, Hyderabad - 500 040.

6.Pentam Sai Kiran S/o. P. Yadagiti, age:27 Ye Employee, rlo. 30-276173/45, PB Surya Naga Neiedmet, Malkajigiri, Hyderabad - 500 056' And

1.The State ofTelangana, reP' bY Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

2.The Station House Officer, PS Malakajigiri, Rachakonda Commissionerate Hyderabad. I

3. Mareddy Anji Reddy s/o. Mallareddy, Aged about 60 Years, rlo.30-276113/55, on Ne Jrgrn, Ma lka t, Occ: Retd. EmPloYee, Plot No. 55, PB SurYa Hyderabad - 500 056. R M L; 4 I 0 E" 8i-4 l yea rs, ou la -a Ii, rs, Occ: Colony, ... Petitioners/Accused No.1to6. Respo nde nt/ResPo ndent' Respondent/Complainant agar Colony, spo nd e nt/Defacto-Co m Pla ina nt. (qr t.-'5 /;;';'",5 J NTC IS MEMO ILE BY HEP TIT ONE tO 6 AND THE 3 .d RESPOND NT D -FAC oco P PR A US NA T NO 1 Itishumblysubnrittedthatduetointerventionoftheeldersandwell. wishers, the 1st petitio rre r/a ccused No.1 to 6 and the 3'd Res po nd ent/De -facto Complainantcameforw.rrdforanamicablesettlementandaccordinglysettledaIl the issues between them by entering intb the present compromise Deed/Memorandum of t,nderstanding 1. The 3.d Respo nde nt/ De-facto complainant herein shall withdraw the c.c.No. 2031 of 2023 pending (,n the file of the learned Principle Junior civil Judge-cum- ]udicialFirstClaSsMarsistrate,Malkajigiri,Malakajigiri-MedchalDistrictandin lieu of the said compr-omise, 3'd Respondent has no g rieva nce/objection for quashingtheC.C.No.203lof2023pendingonthefileofthelearnedPrinciple Junior Civil Judge-cu m -Judicial First class Magistrate, Malkajigiri, Malakajigiri- Medchal District in the l)resent quash petition'

2. In lieu of the Understanding between the parties, PetitionerS/ accused No.1to 6 herein has agreed to tendei apology voluntarily and unconditionally to the 3'd Respondent/De-facto c omplainant as pei- the desire of the .3'd Respondent/De- facto complainant here n. 4. Both the parties hereby confirm that there are no other claims whatsoever against each other in anY manner. 5.Boththepartieslrereinareherebydeclarethatalltheadverseallegations leveledagainsteachol.herintheirpleadingsbeforethecourt'oflawaredeemed to have been withdrawn in view of present compromise' 6. Both the parties hereby declare that this would be full and final settlement, and further agreed th:rt both of them shall not interfere with day-to-day affairs of each other and bcth of them shall lead their independent lives in future without creating disturbancerto each other, and further they declare that no partyShallclaiman/rightsinanymanneragainSteachotherincluding monetary benefits. 7. The 3.d respond en l/de -facto complainant undertakes that she will not claim anymonetarybenefitsinanymannerfromthePetitioners/Accusedhenceforth. g. Both the parties lrereby undertake that they will cooperate lvith each other tion of lhe term\ and conditions of the present MOU' for im M n IA 2 Z, 0r ( I ft2,,,,.: j't':': .') 7 f#. The Petitioners and 3'd Respondent declare tha both of them after understanding the contents' any threat or coercion from any side. Hence it is prayed that this Hon'ble cou parties to compound the offences under section above compromise terms in the above Crl'P No' 2031 of 2023 pending on the file of the learne First Class Magistrate, Malkajigiri, Malakajigiri- respondent/de-facto complainant against the pe (. 'this Memo has been signed bY in Free State of mind without may be pleased to Permit the 26 rlw.34 of IPC in lieu of the 2315 of 2025 in C.C.No. Junior Civil J ud ge-cu m -J udicia I edchal District filed bY the 3'd tio ners/accused, in the interest "B- E ? DA (ur / /a'^.r Petitioner/Accused No. 1 to 6. /^l, ldRespondent/ De-facto plainant Counsel for the Petitioners 1to 6. Counsel for Respondent No.3/ De-facto comPlainant Place: Hvderabad. Date:1$ldl}d_ H