Ga nesh Nagd r, Ka rim naga r districl'(epo r.ro. 6s-oz i-g v. Telangana, Ameerpet, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SARATH
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226, 300(4)
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Havi:rg regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons alike in the order dated O3.O9.2O25 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23138 of 2025, this Writ I I \\ *\%;-i- ' .:l:L-r.i:ri":l:,:i 3 Petition is disposed of directing the…
Judgment
Cause title
RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or orders more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing and paying the retirement benefits, such as Final ELs amount of Rs. 5,5g,000/- with Token No. 2507258714 Dt. 1otost2o24, is illegal, unfair, unjust and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300(4) of the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to release the said benefits together with interest @ 1g % pA on lA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petitic'n under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidarrit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents in not releasing and pay the retirement benefits of the petitioner srch as, Finar ELs amount of Rs. 5,59,000/_ with roken No. 2507258714 Dt. 1O/OS,2O24, pending disposat of the W.p Counsel for .he petitioner: SRI p. UGENDER REDDY counsel for rhe Respondents: AGp FoR SERVTCES ,r The Court marde the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.5O27 of 2o.26 THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 Between: Vengala Aruna. AND ...Petitioner
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department and others. ...Respondents
ORDER:
Heard Sri P.Ugender lteddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-lII appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the instant Writ Petition questioning the action of the respondents 1n not releasing the petitionerls retiral 2 benefits, clespite token numbers having already been raised by the respondent authorit.ies for payment of the amounts payable to the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Ils raised in the present Writ Petition has already been adjudicated by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.2313B of 2025, which was disposed of uide order dated
03.09 .2025, and thus prayed to pass a similar order in the present Writ Petition also
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-Ill did not.dispu,:e the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the disposal of W.P.No.23138 of 2025 dated 03.09.2025 and submits that the respondents will release the amounts on a priority basis of the token numbers and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders.
Operative part
Havi:rg regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons alike in the order dated O3.O9.2O25 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23138 of 2025, this Writ I I \\ *\%;-i- ' .:l:L-r.i:ri":l:,:i 3 Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from today, failing which, the entir€ amount with regard to the retiral benefits shall carry interest at the rate of LOo/o per annum, from the date the amount fell due, till the actual date of its payment Miscellaneous petitions pending, if &ry, in this Writ Petition, shali stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-A. SRINIVASA REDDY T REG /TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, 1' The Princioar secretary, Finance Department, secretariat, T.s.,Hyderabad. I ft! *?E'AU .i,l;,lx;e:i r-lgr'i.lffilii;I"3t,.,n,ent or' re,a nsa na, 'k;;ifi;;a 3. The District rreas"u-ry -offffi 4. The Sub-Treasury Ciffrc;;; K;iiilnag"r] rarimnalar District, 5. rhe Director. Dinjctorri; biw;;ji#bu;i,##xrund chird werfare (*DCW) e Iff L'i 16 s[i"dl[[Ei,i"irii ;;;;d" t,,., 7. rwo ccs to op ron-Sr{v-rii5iiltiib'h i;;.f",,1.," st.t" of Tetansana at 8. Two CD Cop-ies Hyderabad IOUTI r District, t I I BM BS HIGH COURT DATED i18t02thl26 ORDER WP.No.502T of 2026 CC TODAY I '5 j-f i i:,i: .-..1 "..:, 12 t T,B ?m$ 5: DISPOSINIG OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226, 300(4); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.