Pottolla Mallaiah v. Hyderabad for the State of Telangana Through P S Thangallapally
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petrtion under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the [/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased quash the F l.R.No. 43 of 2025 dated 26 01 .2025 on the file of the Police Station Thangallapally, Rajanna Srrcilla registered U/s. 118(2), 115(2), 296b, R/w 3(5) BNS, section 3(1)(r)(s)(c), 3(2)(Va) of SC & Sr (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 on the basis of the complaint dated 26.O1 2025 made by the Defacto Complainant/Respondent no.2 herein. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the [t4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in F.l.R. No.43 of 2025 dated 26.01 .2025 on the file of the Police Station Thangallapally, Rajanna Sircilla @FE;z registered U/s 1 18(2), 115(2) 296b, R/w 3(5) BNS, section : (1)(r)(s)(c), 3(2)(Va) of SC and ST (POA) Amendment Act, 201 5 including the a r :st of the petitioner he rein. This Petition corning on for hearing, upon perusinrt lre lr,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal F,etitron and upon hearing the argunt ,nts of Sr i T Surya Satrsh, Advocate for the Petitroner and the Additional puo i prosecutor for the State of relangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 an I None appeared for Respondent no.2. The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2407 OF 2025 DATE: 08-01-2026 Between Pottolla Mallaiah And Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Courl at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana, Through P.S. Thangallapally and another ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permisston to withdraw the Criminal Petition with a liberty to the petitioner to Respondents seek appropriate remedies according to law
2. Permission is accorded
3. Granting liberty as sought for, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn [/iscellaneous Petitions pending , if any, shall stand clos e,Q- SD/- MOMINA MEHAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ To //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
The ll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Sircilla - .-=r-:€&sl .F,W;.wr3 '7 _/ ./
The Station House Officer, Thangallapally Pohce Statrorr Ralanna Sircilla.
Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, Hrgh court for the st.r' r of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] \
One CC to SRl. T Surya Satish, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies PT;,PSI, o I f ( HIGH COURT DATED: 0810112026 .-=: ,/4tl ir\fE t () i6 ::B ?026 ORDER CRLP.No.2407 of 2025 , f,::-;--;r'! /. ) ,.,.. ./ DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION AS WITHDRAWN o3 t
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Va of SC and ST POA Amendment Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 08 Jan 2026. The bench was TIRUMALA DEVI EADA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.