Mohd Yousuf v. Mohd. Shakeel Khan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petition under A.rlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds frled herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order and decreetal order dt.27.01.2021 passed in LA.No 18 of 2021 in O.S.No.4 of 2O15 by the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad. Between Mohd Yousuf, s/o. Late. Abdul Rasool , Aged about 36 years, occ Lorry Driver, R/o.Mangalgi Village, c/o. Yousuf Azmeri, 1st Near water tank, Humanabad Taluq, Bidar District, Karnataka State. . .. Petitloner/Respondent No. 1 AND
Mohd. Shakeel Khan , s/o. Mohd. Burhan Khan, Aged about 50 years, occ. Business, R/o. H.N0.19-3-2631N4014, Achireddy Nagar, Bibikachesma, Jahanuma, Hyderabad.
Bahseer Ahmed Sha Ali, S/o. Md. SHoukath Ali, Aged 60 years, Occ. Agricultre, R/o. H.No.3-'1-1 14, Gadi Street, Zaheerabad.
Abbas Sha Ali, S/o. Mohd Yousuf Mustafa Sha Ali, Aged 55 years, Occ. Business, Rio. H,No.3-1-1 14, Gadi Street, Zaheerabad RespondenUPetitroner Respondents/Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.4 of 2015 on the file of Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad pursuant to order and decreetal otdet d1.27.1.2O21 passed in l.A.No.18/21 in O.S.No.4/15 on the file of Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad pending disposal of the above revision. :!:g* Counsel for the Petitione(s).SRl. Pramod Singh Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following ORDER ,i''d:,ije THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA C.R.P. No.4OS of 2O2L ORDER: Today when the matter has come up before this Court for hearing, Sri Pramod Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for further adjudication and has become infructuous.
Operative part
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/- T.SRINIVASAREDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ---7-> //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad. (with records if any) 2. One CC to SRl. Pramod Singh, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies JA//PSL @ HIGH COURT DATED:19/1 1/2025 ORDER CRP.No 405 of 2021 'i::.- ri, a '' -. \HE SI 7 i t8 lt]26 \'' c a-) a- + - I l-""^rc t * CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS /r\ tJ t- JG t6f1L6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.