Syed Ali Akbar Hussain v. State of A.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Sep 2010
- Bench
- R KANTHA RAO
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 366, 382, 506
Judgment
Operative part
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3823 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. This criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.149 of 2009 of Narayanaguda Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 323, 382, 366 and 506 IPC. On perusal of the complaint which was forwarded to the police by the Magistrate, basing on which a crime was registered, discloses the material attracting the offences alleged. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that several cases have been filed by the second respondent-wife against the petitioner-husband and this is one of the false cases filed by the wife to harass the husband. This Court earlier passed an order directing the police not to arrest the petitioner and to proceed with the investigation. Since the matter is under investigation, I am not inclined to quash the First Information Report, however, I direct the police to complete the investigation at an early date. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. Date: 29.09.2010 ________________ R.KANTHA RAO,J HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3823 OF 2009 DATE: 29.09.2011
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 366, 382, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Sep 2010. The bench was R KANTHA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.