Banoth Soltha, Wo Veeranna v. Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
not survive for adjudication, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infrucluous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the submissions and as the cause raised in the petition does not survive for adjudication, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infrucluous. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, ITTRUE COPY/' "-1"'J,j'i,:'^T"'""':::j::fi ":';;;:1""' " 2 ""i;5*"1'ffllt?J+tH / SECTION…
Judgment
Cause title
1 State of Telangana, rep. by its public Prosecutor, High court of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2 Upendar Kastala, Occ Labourer R/o Ragunandhapalem Village And Mandal Khammam District. ...PETITTONERyACCUSEO(S) ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order Ot. 20-09-2022 passed in Crl. tV.P. No. 1253/2018 in C.C. No. 6 of 2018 on the file of Principal District Judge, Khammam and consequently direct the police to return the property of the petitioner i.e. tractor of the petitioner seized in connection with C.C. No. 6/2018 on the file of Honble Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Khammam l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead Upendar Kastala, S/o Thirapaiah, aged 38 years, Occ: labourer, R/o Raghunadhapalem village and mandal, Khammam district as respondent No.2 in the CRLP No. 2243 of 2024 and l.A. No. 1 of 2024 l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the police to return the property of the petitioner i.e. tractor of the petitioner seized in connection with C.C. No. 6/2018 on the file of Hon'ble Prl- District and Sessions J udge, Khammam This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argurnents of
Sri G RAVI CHANDRA SEKFAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Addit onal Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Fespondent No1. and none appear for the Respondent No2. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No.2243 ot 2024
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the order, dated 20.09.2022 passed in Crl.lM.P.No.1253 of 2018 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 on the file of the Principal Diskict Judge, Khammam and consequently direct the police to return the case property of the petitioner.
The petitioner is the owner of the Bullet Motor Cycle bearing No.TS 04 EP 6440, which was seized in Crime No.292 of 2017 of P.S.Raghunathapalem. The petitioner filed Cd.M.P.No.1253 ot 2018 seeking for interim custody of the said Motor Cycle and the said petition was dismissed. Challenging the same the present Criminal Petition is filed.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that during pendency of this criminal petition, the accused was convicted on 18.03.2025.
Operative part
Considering the submissions and as the cause raised in the petition does not survive for adjudication, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infrucluous. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, ITTRUE COPY/' "-1"'J,j'i,:'^T"'""':::j::fi ":';;;:1""' " 2 ""i;5*"1'ffllt?J+tH / SECTION OFFICER adhaparem' Kh ammam District
3. One CC to SRl. G RAVI CHANDRA SEKHAR Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC to SRl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate [OPU 3] I Two CD Copies AG/PSL ,, Yfr- HIGH COURT I I DATED:2410612025 I t :..- \. 17 SEP 2O2Ii I t',?l aFl',-.,., _/ ORDER CRLP.No.2243 of 2024 CRLP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS r Z> ( t?,f
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: not survive for adjudication, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infrucluous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.