The High Court · 2025

of Telangana, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court,

2. Uchuluri Sri Laxmi, Wo. Rama Rao, Aged about 25 yrs, Occ. Labour, R/o. Newly Constructed Apartment, Near Shivaji Park, Judges Colony, R.R.Dist., N/o. Adi Andhra Colony, Kanduku(m) Nellore Dist., Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.191012023 on the file of the Vll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, AT.Hayathnagar, R.R.Dist., so far as the petitioner / Accused are concerned. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Between: Uchuluri Sri Laxmi, Wo. Rama Rao, Aged about 25 yrs, Occ. Labour, R/o. Newly Constructed Apartment, Near Shivaji Park, Judges Colony, R.R.Dist., N/o. Adi Andhra Colony, Kanduku(m) Nellore Dist., Andhra Pradesh ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. 2 AND

1. Gannavarapu Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Narasaiah, Aged about 38 yrs, Occ. ltrlasion, R/o. Kuntloor, Hayathnagar, R.R.Dist., N/o. Sanamur (v), Marripudi (m), Prakasham Dist., Andhra Pradesh.

2. The State of Hyderabad. Telangana, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONT}ENT/RESPONDENT NO. 1 Petition under Section 359 (2) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to accord permission to compound the offence between the Petitioner i Respondent No.2 and Respondent / Petitioner / Accused in C.C.No 1910/2023 on the file the Vll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, AT Hayathnagar, R.R.Dist. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) and 359 (6) of BNSS Code praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Qriminal Petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the offence between the Petitioner / Respondent No.2 and Respondent Petitioner / Accused in C.C.No.191012023 on the file the VII Addl. Metropolitan [\/agistrate, Cyberabad, AT.Hayathnagar, R.R.Dist. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J. Mallikarjun, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri Racha Arun, Advocate for the Respondent No.

2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT, JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.2331 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.1910 of 2023 on the file of Vll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 509 and 506 of IPC

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.'1 and 2 o'f 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order daled 20.02.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. i I 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 25.02.2025 and the same is placed on record. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed

5. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.1910 of 2023 on the file of VII Additional lvletropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, are hereby quashed l\4iscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed orr,3ft'ftu*?3't+ito* / f\$-=",roN oFFrcER The Vlr Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate cyberaad at Hayathnagar' RR' ,,TRUE COPY// District I[:j,"'i:'ig R:[:?3T::k"Yil?'JISX'$tr.3'1i""""'ll"'1"'l;"'n113:'X;'#$'1$ p'oll"utor' High court ror the State or relansana at lv:":"";ii&lpuori" to Sri J Mallikariun Advocate toPucl ;;"" One CC to Sri Racha Arun' Advocate [OPUCI Two CD CoPies (Along with a coPY of Joint Memo) I To, 1 2 3

4. ( o VH/PSL s I t I I I I I HIGH COURT DATED: 03103t2025 COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 1 AND 2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.2331 of 2025 /\ e -)c I t-tf: " 0 fl Liri 2iI5 D.::.,rr.,r.,.,,,.""! -.-.*"/' ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION @t'f-* W IN TIIE HIGH CO F.IUDICATI]RE FOR THE STATE OF AT:: Iil,DERABAD. of 2025 IN .)?3l otzozs CRL.P.NO. Between: Gannavarapu Venkateshwartu, S/o. Narasaiah, Aged about 38 yrs, Occ: Masion, R/o. Kuntloor, H ayathnagar, R.R.Dist., N/o. Sanamur (v), Marripudi (m), Prakasham Dist.,, Andhra Pradesh. AND . ..Petitioner / Accused 1 The State of Telangana rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

2. Uchuluri Sri Laxmi, W/o. Rama Rao, Aged about 25 yrs, Occ: Labour, R/o. Newly Constructed Apa-rtment, Nezrr Shivaji'Park, Judges Colony, R.R.Dist., N/o. Adi Andhra Colony, Kandukur(m) Nellore Dist., Andhra Pradesh. JOINT MEMO FILED BY BOTH THE PARTIES Respondents It is submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the 2na Respondent / Defacto-Complainant, the police laid the charge sheet before the Hon'ble Vll Addl. Matropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, At.Hayathnagar, R R.Dist., and the same is pending, The Petitioner herein filed the above quash petition seeking to quash the proceedings in the said case at the intervention of elders of both sides, the Petitioner herein and the 2d Respondent / Defacto-Complainant came to an understanding with an outcome of compromise, as such both are intending to compromise the matter and the Defacto-Complainant is intending to withdraw the above said case i.e. C.C.No.1910/2023 for the offense U/s. 509, 506 of l.P.C, This joint memo have been entered and executed with the will and wish of the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent herein. Hence this joint memo. Place : Hyderabad Date . lTw2025 Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused 1 u *u3, q *-t.$:'r Petitioner / Accused / v. t\ o*t_.6 { 2nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant Fz-*A Counset fJr" the 2"d Responde(t / Defacto-Complainant r' T