Writ Petition No. 13434 of 1998 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The writ petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction giving liberty to the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 s. 14(2)
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an Appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari, calling for all connected records of office order F.1-4/NVS(HR)/98- 99/309, dt.22.4.98 and consequential relieving order No.2-21/JNVO/1988-99 dt.28.4.98 and quash the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.A.CHAYA DEVI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.RUPENDRA VAGRE, Standing Counsel for Navodaya Vidyalaya Samithi The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.13434 OF 1998
ORDER:
Operative part
Mr.Rupendra Vagre, learned counsel for Navodaya Vidyalaya Samithi submits that by reason of notification issued under Section 14 (2) of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, (the Act, for brevity) the initial jurisdiction vests in the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad branch. Learned counsel has placed before this Court, the notification issued under Section 14(2) of the Act, extending the provisions of the Act to Navodaya Vidyalaya Samithi from 01.01.1999. In that view of the matter, this Court has no jurisdiction to interfere at the initial stage as held by the Supreme Court in L.Chandra Kumar v Union of India. The writ petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal if the cause of action survives.
08.11.2004. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) To 1 The Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 D.Kalyani Sundar, Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Deputy Director, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samithi, Secunderabad. 4 Two C.D. Copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction giving liberty to the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 — s. 14(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 08 Nov 2004. The bench was V V S RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.