T.Janardhan Rao v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Director General of police

#6. The Advisory Committee, Rep. by its Chairman Sri. C.R.Kamalanathan, A.p. Reorganization, 5th Floor, C Block, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not finalizing .....RESPONDENTS the state level seniority of the applicant vis a vis the other employees working in APSP and TSSP in the successor States of Andhra pradesh and Telangana before allocating him to the state of Andhra Pradesh and choosing to hurriedly go through and allot him to the state of Andhra pradesh that too after reversion from his present post of Head constable to Police constable as being violative of the petitioners righls' under Article 14 and 16 of the constitution of lndia apart from being violative of the Kamalnathan committee guidelines and direct fixation of seniority as required under the guidelines. |.A.NO:1 OF 2017 (WPMP. NO: 8928 OF 2017) Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings bearing Rc .No.666/41-EstU2O.l4-j7, HOO No.307/2017 dated 23-02-2017 insofar as the petitioner is concerned and thereby stay allocation and posting of the petitioner in the reverted capacity of police constable to the residuary state of Andhra pradesh. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI A.SRINATH Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 : SRI K.THARUN CHOWDARY, AGp REPRESENTING ON BEHALF OF THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRt A.RAGHURAM, AGp FOR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH I W.P.NO: 7264 OF 2017 Between: B.Satya. Rqo,, S/o. lrppanna, aged about 53 years, Occ HC-'285, A Cov. Bth Battallion, TSSP, R/o D-26, Old Qtrs, Kondapur, Potice Line, Ranga Reddy Oiitrict - 500 084. AND .....PETITIONER

#1. The State of Telan_gana, Rep. by its Director General of police, office of the DGP, Lakdikapul, Saifabad, Hyderabad- SOO 004.

#2. The state of Andhra Pradfsh, Rep by its Director Generar or police, office of the DGP, Lakdikapul, Saifabad, Hydeiabad- S00 004.

#3. Additional Director General of Police, TSSP battalions, Shourya Bhavan, Hyderabad- 5O0 033.

#4. APSP Battalions Head Quarters, TSPA, Hyderabad. 5. The Commandant, 8th Battallion, APSP, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District-

#6. The Advisory Committee, Rep. by its Chairman Sri. C.R.Kamalanathan, A.P Reorganization, 5th Floor, C Block, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not finalizing the State level seniority of the applicant vis a vis the other employees working in APSP and TSSP in the successor. States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana before allocating him to the State of Andhra Pradesh and choosing to hurriedly go through and allot him to the State of Andhra Pradesh that too after reversion from his present post of Head Constable to Police Constable as being. violative of the petitioners rights under Article 1 4 and 16 of the constitution of lndia apart from being violative of the Kamalnathan Committee guidelines and direct fixation Of seniority as required under the guidelines. LA.NO:1 OF 2017 (WPMP.NO:8935 OF 2017) l I I Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings bearing Rc.No.666iA'l€stV2014-17, HOO No.3O7l2O17 dated 15-02-2017 insofar as the petitioner is cnncerned and thereby stay allocation and posting of the petitioner in the reverted capacity of police constable to the residuary state of Andhra Pradesh. Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI A.SRINATH Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1,2 & 3 : SRI K.THARUN CHOWDARY, AGP REPRESENTING ON BEHALF OF THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI A.RAGHURAM, AGP FOR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH The Court made the following COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI WRII' PETITION Nos.7258 rod, 7264 of 2OL7 COMMON ORDE,R: 6ter Hon'bte Si Justice Sujog Paul) Sri A.Srinath, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks to withdraw these petitions unconditionally.

#2. Sri K.Therun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader represe nting on behalf of learned Advocate Genera-l for respondent Nos"1, 2 and 3 and Sri A.Raghuram, Iearned Assistant Government Pk:ader for State of Andhra Pradesh for respondent No.2 has no objection. I

#3. According$, these Writ Petitions are dismissed zrs withdrawn unconditionally, No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// I SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR N OFFICER 1. Two CC's to ,{DVOCATE GENERAL, High Court for the State of Telangana at 2. One CC to SRI A.SRINATH Advocate IOPUCI 3. One CC to Sttl A.RAGHURAM, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. (OUT) e- To SA BS I HIGH COURT DATED:091O112025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.7258 AND 7264 of 2017 riE Si.i 9S 6 o :i 's *, 2aFEB na J Sr,"-l!: ( ( DISMISSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDR,AWN WITHOUT COSTS. l