The High Court · 2025

8- Smt. Farzana Begum, D/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, W/o Ahmed Khan, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/Plaintiffs

9. K.Nageshwara Rao, Sio Sri Ramulu, Aged about 58 years, Occ. Business 10. Smt. S.Yashoda,, D/o Sri Ramulu Aged about 52 years, Occ. Housewife,

11.Smt. T. Lakshmi Kumari, D/o Sri Ramulu Aged about 51 years, Occ. Housewife

12.Smt. S.Parvathi, D/o Sri Ramulu Aged about 51 years, Occ. Housewife, (All are F/o Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State ) 1 3. The Tahsildar, Rajendrangar lvlandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ... Respondents/Defendants No.16 to 20 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Between:

1. K.Nageshwara Rao, S/o Late Koneru Sriramulu, Aged abou.t 59 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.3-1-157, Yagantiwin, Rajendranagar 1"' line, Pattabhipuram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

2. Smt. T. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o Jagan Mohan Rao, Age:65 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Flat No.302, Balaji Nilayam, H.No.4-1-41, Lane:1, Rammannapet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

3. Smt. S.PaNathi, Wo Durga Malleswara Rao, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No.3-4-52912, Flat No.201, Devi Laxmi Nilayam, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.g,1't & 12 AND 1 . Abdul Sattar (Died Per LR) 2. Abdul Sayeed, S/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. + 3- Abdul Wahab @ Abdul Dastagir, S/o Abdul Razzak, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Viilage, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Stale.

4. Durdana Begum, Wo Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

5. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 6. Abdul Khadeer, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, RJo H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

7. Rehana Begum, W/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 8. Abdul Ghouse Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.&37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 9. Abdul Ghayaz Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l0.Rubeena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 31 years. Occ. Household, Rio H.No 8-2-2931J82/A29, Jubilee Hills, Journalists Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad, Telangana. ll.Ruheena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 30 years. Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.G37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l2.Farhana Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.G37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

13. Sogra Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 71 years, Occ. Household, Ryo H.No.9-B-34, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad 500 008, Telangana l4.Malika Begum (Died Per LR's) (Appellants No.'19 to 25) ls.Tahera Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.9-8-30, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad - 500 008, Telangana l6.Sultana Begum,, W/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

17.Neha Begum, D/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 18. Abdul Shahbaz, S/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 22 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No 6-37. Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

19.Syed Muklhar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

20.Syed Umar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-2-63. Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 2l.Naseeba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No 3-2'63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

22.Syed Yahiya, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 23 ]ayqba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No 3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Teiangana State .l

24.Syed f?tgqqrS/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, TelJngana State.

25.Sy.ed OlTanr S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Teldngana State. (AII are Rep, by their General Power of Attorney holder Khaleel Hussain, S/o. lqlq [ll.o-hq!nrngd Vilayet Hussain, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, F/o H.No.1 8-1 3-6/8, Hashamabad, Chan-drayangutta, Hyderabad) ...Respondent Nos.'l to 25lAppellants

26. lvlohammed Hassnuddin (Died per LRs 2 to 8)

27. Smt Soghra Begum, Occ. Housewife, R/o 9-8-34 -Wo late Mohd. Hassanuddin. Aged about 69 years,

28. Mohammed Hassan Uddin, S/o late t\,,lohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business

29. fi,4ohammed Habeeb Uddin, S/o late li4ohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business

30. Mohd. Shaf Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, (Died - lssue less) 31.Mohd. Riyaz Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business,

32.lvlohd. Azhar Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business, (Respondents No.2 to 7 are Rl/o H.No. 9-8-30, KummaMadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad).

33. Smt..Farzana Begum, D/o late_Mohd Hassanuddin, Wo Ahmed Khan, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, " Golconda, Hyderabad. Respondent Nos.26 to 33/Respondent Nos.1 to 8

34. Smt. S.Yashoda, Wo Venkata Subba Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No.10-84, Enkipadu, Vijayiwada Rural, (rishna District_

35. The Tahsildar, Rajendrangar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana ...Respondent Nos.34 & 35/Respondent No.{0 & 13 Petition under Order 39 Rule 4 r/w Order 4.1 Rule 21 r/w Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 16-04- 2024 in lA No. 4 of 2021 in AS No. 84 of 2021 . 6- lA NO: 2 OF 20it4 Between: K.Nageshwara Rao, S/o Late Koneru Sriramulu, Aged about.5g Vears, Occ: Business. R/o H.No.3-1-157, Yagantiwin, Rajendra-naoar 1., line, Pattabhiprlram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. 9mt. T. Lakshmr Kumari, W/o Jagan Mohan Rao, Age:65 years, Occ: Housewife, Rtio Flat No.302, Balaji Nilayam, H.Io 4:1-41,'Lane:i, Rammannapet. Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. Smt S P€.vathi Housewife, R/o H.No.3-4-52912, Flat No.201, Devi Laxmi Nilayam, Narayangr.rda, Hyderabad. W/o Durg_q Malteswara Rao, Aged about 61 years, Occ. . ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.9,11 & 12 1 2 3 AND .1 . Abdul Satlar (Died Per LR) Z 49Oy! .Sayegd, S/o late A,bdul Razzak, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, ---' Rt/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy Oistrict, Telangana State. 3. Abdul Wanab @ Abdul Dastagir, S/o Abdul Razzak, Aoed about 69 vears. neaOy Olsiiict, Occ. Bus ness, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Viilage, Telangana State. .Raiga

4. Durdana l3e_gum, Wo L_ate Abdul eayyum, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Householc, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Villa!;-e, Rangi Reddy District, retingini State.

5. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, T'elangana Stat,a 6. Abdul Khadeer, S/o Late. Abdut .eayyum, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Viilalje, Rangi Reddy Distric( i"fJngini State. 7 Egn?.nq Begqm W/o Abd-yl Ghani, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Household, - - -' Rr/o H.No.€i-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy Districti Telangana Staie A A9Oyl pho,ugg Pasha, S/o Abdul_Ghani,Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, ---' R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Stite. S 49Oy! Ghayaz Pasha, S/o.Abdut Ghani,Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, -State. ---' Ryo H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Re?dy District, f'etangana '10. Rubeena B_egu[, D./o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Journatitts Cotony, Rio H.No.8-2-293lJ82lMg, Jubitee -Hiils, Hyderabad Telangana. Household, Shaikpet, '1 1. Ruheena llggum, D/o Abd-ul Ghani, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, Ryo H.No 6-37, Narsingi Viilage, Ranga-Reddy Districti Tetangana SGi;- - -' 12. F.arhana B-egum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, - - -' R/o H.No 6-37, Narsingi Viilage, RangtReddy District, Telangana St;i; 13.9ogra.Begum, D/o late Abdul RazzaK Aged about 71 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.9-8-34, Kumarwadi, Chota Baz6r, Hyderabad'500 b08, Tei;;g;;; -' 1 4. tvlalika Begum (Died Per LR's) (Appeilants No.1 9 to 25) -v- 1s.Tahera Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.9-8-30, Kumaruuadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad - 500 008, Telangana.

16. Sultana Begum,, Wo late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

17.Neha Begum, D/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Household, Rr/o H..No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. '18. Abdul Shahbaz, S/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 22 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.6-37. Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

19.Syed Mukthar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Businesi, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

20.Syed Umar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63. lvloinabad, Ranga Reddy Drstrict, Telangana State 2l.Naseeba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, Rt/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

22.Syed Yahiya, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, RJo H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

23.Tayaba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

24.Syed Farooq, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Business, R:/o H.No.3-2-63, Ivloinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

25.Syed Osman, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, lVloinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. (All are Rep, by their General Power of Attorney holder Khaleel Hussain, S/o. late Mohammed Vilayet Hussain, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.'18-13-6/8, Hashamabad, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad) ...Respondent Nos.1 to 25lAppellants

26. Mohammed Hassnuddin (Died per LRs 2 to 8)

27. Smt. Soghra Begum, Wo late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o 9-8-34

28. Mohammed Hassan Uddin, S/o late tt/ohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business

29. Mohammed Habeeb Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business

30. Mohd. Shaf Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, (Died - lssue less)

31.Mohd. Riyaz Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Businegs,

32. tt/ohd. Azhar Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business, (Respondents No.2 to 7 are Rl/o H.No. 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad). -*.

33.Smt. Farzana Begum, D/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Wo Ahmed Khan, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, Ryo 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda. Hyderabad. Respondent Nos.26 to 33/Respondent Nos.1 to 8

34.Smt. S.Yashoda, W/o Venkata Subba Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Housewife, RJo H.No.10-84, Enkipadu, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District.

35. The Tahsildar, Rajendrangar Mandal, Rajendran?gar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...Respondent Nos.34 & 3s/Respondent No.10 & 13 Petition urder Order 39 Rule 4 r/w Order 41 Rule 21 r/w Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the lligh Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 16-04- 2O24 tn lA No. 5 ,:f 2021 in AS No. 84 of 2021 and pass lA NO: 3 OF 202t, Between:

1. K.Nageshwara Rao, S/o Late Koneru Sriramulu, Aged about 59 years, Occ Business, tUo H.No.3-1-157, Yagantiwin, Rajendranagar 1'' line, Pattabhipu'am, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

2. Smt. T. Lakshmi Kumari, Wo Jagan Mohan Rao, Age:65 years, Occ: Housewife, FJo Flat No.302, Balaji Nilayam, H.No.4-1-4'1, Lane:'1, Rammannapet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

3. Smt. S.Parvathi, W/o Durga Malleswara Rao, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Housewife. R/o H.No.3-4-52912, Flal No.20'1, Devi Laxmi Nilayam, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.9,11 & 12 AND 1 2 4 5 Abdul Sattar (Died Per LR) Abdul Sayeed, S/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 4s1ears, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Abdul Wahab @ Abdul Dastagir, S/o Abdul Razzak, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Durdana Uegum, W/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Household R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Abdul Kha eel, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged aboul 40 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Abdul Khadeer, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. - 3-

7. Rehana Begum, Wo Abdul Ghani, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 8. Abdul Ghouse Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, Ryo H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 9. Abdul Ghayaz Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l0.Rubeena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.8-2-2931J821A29, Jubilee Hills, Journatists Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad, Telangana. ll.Ruheena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged ab6ut 30 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State l2.Fathana Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 13.Sogra Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 71 years, Occ. Household, RJo H.No.9-8-34, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad 500 008, Telangana 1 4. Malika Begum (Died Per LR's) (Appellants No.19 to 25) 15.Tahera Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.9-8-30, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad - 500 008, Telangana.

16. Sultana Begum,, Wo late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

17.Neha Begum, D/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Household, Rt/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 18.Abdul Shahbaz, S/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 22 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37. Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. '19. Syed tr,4ukthar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

20.Syed Umar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63. lvloinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 2l.Naseeba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

22.Syed Yahiya, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

23.Tayaba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, Ryo H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

24.Syed Farooq, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Busrness, Rt/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

25.Syed Osman, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. (All are Rep, by their General Power of Attorney holder Khaleel Hussain, S/o. late Mohammed Vilayet Hussain, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, FJo H.No.18-13-6/8, Hashamabad, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad) ...Respondent Nos.1 to 25/Appellants

26. Mohammed Hassnuddin (Died per LRs 2 to 8) I

27. Smt. Soohra Beoum Occ. HoIsewife,"nyo S-a-a+ ^Wo-late la - Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 69 years, .

23.Mohammed Hassan Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business

29.Mohammed Habeeb Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business

30. Mohd. Shaf Uddin, S/o late lr/ohd. Hassanuddin, (Died _ lssue less) 31.lVohd. Riyaz Uddin. S/o late Mohd. Hassanudriin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business,

32. Mohd. Azhar Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business, (Respondents No.2 to 7 are R/o H.No. 9_g_30, Kummaruruadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad). 33 Smt..Farzana Be_gum, D/o rate-Mohd. Hassanuddin, wo Ahmed Khan. aoed about 45 years. Occ: Housewife, R/o 9_8_30, Kffi;r*#,'C;;i"'iL1ilr." Golconda, Hyderabad. ...Respondent Nos.26 to 33/Respondent Nos.1 to g

34. Smt. S Y_asipda, W/o V^enkata Subba Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Housewif e Rl/o H. No. 1 0_84, Enki pad u, VijiyairaOl' nrraf , (risnnl -Oi?rict 35. The Tahsildar, Raiendrangar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...Respondent Nos.34 & 3s/Respondent No.10 & 13 Petition under order 39 Rure 4 r/w order 41 Rure 2.r r/w section 151 of CPC praying thar in the circumstances stated in the alfidavit fit"J i;-.;p;; ;; [e_ ggtit]9n, the High Court may be pteased to sei asiOe the order dated .16-04- 2024 in lA No.6 of 2021 in AS Nb. 84 of 2021 . lA NO: 4 oF 2024 Between: 1 2 K Nageshwara Rao, s/o Late.Koneru sriramuru, Aged about b9 vears. occ Business, Ryo H No 3-1-157, yaganiiwi;; R;6b;;"";;;F't;;:"''", " Pattabhipura.n, Guntur, AndhraF;a;;h:'v,,virvrsrruYqr I 9mt. T. Laksrmi Kumari, W/o-Jagan Mohan Rao, Age:65 years, Occ: Housewife. FVo Flar No 302 ear;ji Nitayam, ljliio iYi_ii,trn",r, Rammannapet. Guntur, Andhra p'raOeii. ' Smt. S.Parvathi. W/o Duroa Mallgswara Rao, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Housewire, F/o H No 3-4_b2el2, Ftai N;.20i'bEiiillil'i'riir"vrr, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.9,.l l & 12 AND - ll - '1 . Abdul Sattar (Died Per LR) 2. Abdul Sayeed, S/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 3. Abdul Wahab @ Abdul Dastagir, S/o Abdul Razzak, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

4. Durdana Begum, Wo Late Abdul Qayyum' Aged about 64 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

5. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 6. Abdul Khadeer, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, R:/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

7. Rehana Begum, W/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 8. Abdul Ghouse Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 9. Abdul Ghayaz Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l0.Rubeena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.8-2-2931J821A29, Jubilee Hills, Journalists Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad, Telangana. ll.Ruheena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 12. Farhana Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 13.Sogra Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 71 years, Occ. Household, Rr/o H.No.9-8-34, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad 500 008, Telangana

14. Ir/alika Begum (Died Per LR's) (Appellants No.19 to 25) 15.Tahera Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.9-8-30, Kumarwadi, Qhota Bazar, Hyderabad - 500 008, Telangana. 16. Sultana B Household State egum,, W/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 39 years, Occ. ,'R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana

17.Neha Begum, D/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 18.Abdul Shahbaz, S/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged aboul22 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.6-37. Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 19.Syed [\,4ukthar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-2-63, It4oinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

20.Syed Umar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63. Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State -14- 2l.Naseeba Begum, D/o Syed yaseen, Aged about 40 years, Occ. R:/o H.No.3-2-63. Moinab'ad, Ranga Red"dy Oistiiii, fe6ngana Sta Household,

22.Sy.ed Yahiya, S/o Syed _yaseen, Aged about 32 years, Occ. BusineSs, Rt/o H.No 3-2-63, Moinab-ad, Ranga (eddy D,.iri"t, i"rJn-grn" strtu ZS.!ay1p1 Begum. D/o Syed. y_aseen, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household. Rl/o H No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Retoy oiirrcr, ieh"grh, iiitl,""""""'", 24.syed Farooq. s/o syed_yaseen, Aged about 29 years, occ. Business, Rl/o H. No. 3-2-63. tr/oinabld, Ranga deO;y bisirict, f Jla'rigana state

25.Sy.ed Osnran, S/o Syed yaseen, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, Ri/o H.No.3-2-63, tVoinabld, Ranga Reddy biitrict, rJ"',ig"na state. ({lt qr.e.Rep. by their General power of Attorney holder Khaleel Hussain, S/o. late Moha'nrned Viravet Hussah, ngeo aooui'ao years, occ. euiiners, -Ryi H. No 1 8- 1 3-6/8, Hastiamabad, anan"di;G;ilita,'Hlieraoao i ...Respondent Nos.1 to 25lAppellants

26. Mohammed Hassnuddin (Died per LRs 2 to 8) 27. Smt. 9ogh.a Begum, Wo-late Mohd. Hassanuddin. Aged about 69 years, Occ. Housewife, R:/o 9-8-34

28. Mohammed Hassan Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business

29.Mohammed Habeeb Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ Business

30. Mohd. Shaf Uddin, S/o late tr/ohd. Hassanuddin, (Died _ lssue tess) 31. Mohd. Riyaz Uddin, S/o late tr,4ohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business.

32.Mohd. Azhar Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddrn, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business (Respondents No.2 to 7 are R/o H.No. 9_g-30, Kummanrvadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad).

33. Smt..Farzana Be-gum, D/o rate_Mohd. Hassanuddin, wo Ahmed Khan. aoed about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o 9_8_30, Kum;a*aJ,"C;;ir'ii;?;r-" Golconda, tlyderabad. .o iT * y,.1 p,q* o" r; Hill" il1,::;il",","::': :"*', "' Housewife, RJo H No.10-84, Enkipadu, rfiyair;;; R;at, (risnnlblsirict. 35.The Tahsildar, Raiendranqar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...Respondent Nos.34 & 35/Respondent No.10 & 13 Petition uncer Order g Rule .13 r/w Section 15.1 of CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in .upplrt-or ilr" 'p"titi""",- inl Hisi t3 Court may be pleased to set the order dt. 08-04-2021 passed in lA No. 2 of 202.1 in AS No. 84 of 2021 . lA NO: 5 OF 2024 Between:

1. K.Nageshwara Rao, S/o Late Koneru Sriramulu, Aged abou.t 59 years, Occ Business, Rl/o H.No.3-1-157, Yagantiwin, Ra.jendranagar 1'' line, Pattabhipuram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

2. Smt. T. Lakshmi Kumari, Wo Jagan Mohan Rao, Age:65 years, Occ: ' Housewife, R/o Flat No.302, Balaji Nilayam, H.No.4-1-41, Lane:1, Rammannapet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

3. Smt. S.Parvathi, W/o Durga lr4alleswara Rao, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o H.No.3-4-529/2, FlaI No.201, Devi Laxmi Nilayam, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. AND ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.9,11 & 12

1. Abdul Sattar (Died Per LR) 2. Abdul Sayeed, S/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 3. Abdul Wahab @ Abdul Dastagir, S/o Abdul Razzak, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Vrllage, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

4. Durdana Begum, Wo Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

5. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 6. Abdul Khadeer, S/o Late Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

7. Rehana Begum, Wo Abdul Ghani, Aged -about 59 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 8. Abdul Ghouse Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6:37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 9. Abdul Ghayaz Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l0.Rubeena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.8-2-2931J821A29, Jubilee Hills, Journalists Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad, Telangana. ll.Ruheena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l2.Farhana Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. t+-

13. Sogra.Beg-um,- D/o late Abdul RazzaK Aged about Z1 years, Occ. Household, "' R/o H.No.9-8-34, Kumarwadi, Chota BazEr, HyOeraUad s00 bos, T.i"ng";,I '14. Malika Begum (Died Per LR's) (Appeilants No..l9 to 25) 15. Tahera Eleg_um, D/o late, Abdul Razzak, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Househo|j, R/o H.No.9-8-30, Kumarwadi, Chota"Bazai, HyOeianaO _ StO OOd, Telanganil.

16.9ultana .Q"ggr,, Wo late Abdul. _Sattar, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Viflage,.Rariga neOay Oistric(-ieiing-;; State 17- Neha. F.eg-uT. D/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Household, Rt/o H.No.5-37, Narsingi Viilage, Ranga-Reddy District, Tei;;g-"n; Si;ie. " "' lS Abdul shahbaz. S/o rate Abdur s_attar, Aged about 22 years, occ. Househord, - '' Rio H.No.{i-37 Narsingi Viilage, Ranga Fi'eddy District,lut"rigini Siat".- . S/o Syed_yaseen, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o

19. Sy.ed Jt/ukthar H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana State.

20. Syed ^U!,gr^, 91o. Syed y_aseen, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o 2l.Naseeba Beoum. D/o Sved yaseen, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, H.No.3-2-63. Ir.4oinabad, Ranga Redly District. Telingana State RVo H.No.:]-2--63, Moinabad, ningi Red"dy oiititii, ilirng"n" st"t"

22. Sy.ed Syed Yaseen, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o ^Y9h1V-a . -S/9 H.No.3-2-63 l\,4oinabad, Ranga Reddy District. Tetdngana State 23.Taya??. Begum, D/o Syed. y_aseen,_Aged about 30 years, Occ. R:/o H.No.3-2-63. Moinabad, Ranga Re6dy District, Teiangana State 'Household,

24.Syed f?rggq.. S/o Syed yaseen, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-83. Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District. Teldngana State.

25.Syed Osman, S/o Syed yaseen, Aged about 2g years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-€3, Moinabbd, Ranga R'eddy Oiitrict, fefa'ngana State. (All are.Rep, by.the-ir Generar power of Attorney hotder Khareer Hussain, s/o. late Mohammed Vilayet Hussain, Aged about'49 years, Occ Susiness, Rd H.No. 1 8-1 il-6/8. Hastiamabad, CnantiJyanguita,-H'v-OlraOaA) ...Respondent Nos.1 to 2slAppellants

26. Mohammed Hassnuddin (Died per LRs 2 to.8) 27. Smt. Soghra Begum, Wo.late Mohd. Hassanuddin. Aged about 69 years, Occ. Housewife. R/o 9-8-34

28. Mohammed Hassan Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business

29.Mohammed Habeeb Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Busrness

30. Mohd. Shaf Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, (Died - tssue less) 31. Mohd. Riyaz Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business,

32. Mohd. Azhar Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddrn, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business, '-- ts' (Respondents No.2 to 7 are Rl/o H.No.9-8-30, KummaMadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad).

33. Smt. Farzana Begum, D/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, W/o Ahmed Khan, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad. ...Respondent Nos.26 to 33/Respondent Nos.1 to 8

34. Smt. S.Yashoda, W/o Venkata Subba Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No.10-84, Enkipadu, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District

35. The Tahsildar, Rajendrangar lrlandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...Respondent Nos.34 & 35/Respondent No.10 & 13 Petition under Order I Rule 13 r/w Section '151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set the order dt. 08-04-2021 passed in lA No. 3 of 2021 in AS No. 84 of 2021. Counsel for the Appellants: Mr. M.S. Srinivasa lyengar, Senior Counsel representing Mr. K. Harish Kumar Counsel for the Respondents No.9,11 and 12:Mr. M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, counsel representing Mr. P. Lakshma Reddy The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT TI-IE HON'BL E SRI JUSTICE P,SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE N MAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO A.S.No.84 of 2O2L JUDGMENT: (2e, the Hon'bte Sri lustice P.sam Koshy) . The instant is an appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. The challenge is to the judgment and decree dated 01.05.2020, in O.S.No.1542 of 20t3, passed by the Hon'ble V Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. Heard Mr. N4.S. Srinivasa Iyengar, learned Senior Counsel, representing Mr. K. Harish Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants / defendant Nos.2 to 13 and 15 and L.Rs. of defendant Nos.1 and 14; and Mr. M.V.S. Suresh Kumar. learned counsel, representing Mr. P. Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel for respondents / Cefendant Nos.9, 11 and 12.

3. The appellants herein are the defendant Nos.2 to 13 and 15 and L.Rs. of dr:fendant Nos.1 and t4; and the respondents herein are the plaintiffs and defendant Nos.16 to 20 before the Trial Court. For con\/enience, the parties are hereinafter referred to with their rank before the Trial Court. PaEe 2 of 72

4. Vide the impugned judgment, the Trial Court had dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for partition and also for declaration of the sale deed dated 01.06.1964 as null and void.

5. The facts in nutshell leading to filing of the instant appeal are that the suit schedule property in the instant case is Survey No.136 admeasuring Ac. 13.07 guntas situated at Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The plaintiffs had filed the suit for partition seeking 1/3'd of the share in the suit schedule property to the plaintiffs and 213'd of the share to the defendant Nos.1 to 15. Along with the said prayer, there was a prayer for separate possession and allot 1/3'd share to the plalntiffs made by metes and bounds by appointing a Commissioner. The further prayer was for nullifying the revenue records and the entries made in the revenue records in respect of the suit schedule property from 1974-75 till the time the suit was filed. The furthbr prayer was also to restore the name of Mr. Abdul Razzaq as the pattedar and possessor of the suit schedule property, thereby deleting the name of Mr. K. Sri Ramulu. Pending the suit, the plaint was further amended seeking for quashment of the registered sale deed as on 01.06.1964 between Mr. Abdul Razzaq and Mr. K. Sri Ramulu.

6. The plaintiffs claim was on the basis of they being the legal heirs of one Smt. Yakoob Bee who was the daughter of late 'Mr. Abdul Rehman,, the original pattedar and possessor of the suit schedule property. Defendant Nos.1 to 15 were the legal heirs of one Mr. Abdul Razzaq who was the son of the aforementioned Mr. Abdul Rehman. Thus, as per the plaintiffs, they as well as defendant Nos.1 to 15 are the legal heirs of Smt. Yakoob Bee and late Mr. Abdul llehman.

7. According to the plaintiffs, the entire suit schedule property was In joint possession between the plaintiffs and defendant Nos.1 to 15 and it was never partitioned. Therefore, the plaintiffs sought for t/3'd of the share in the property which was in the name of late Mr. Abdul Rehman. According to the plaintiffs, after the death of iate Mr. Abdul Rehman, since his son Mr. Abdul Razzaq was the elder male merrber in the family, the property stood mutated in his name. Subsequently, Mr. Abdul Rehman also died leaving behind defendant Nos.1 to 15 and, Smt. Yakoob Bee, the mother of the plaintiffs, also died leaving behind the plaintiffs. Since the suit schedule property was the ancestral property, the sons and daughters of late Mr. Abdul Rehman also would be entitled for a share in the suit schedule property. According to the plaintiffs, as per the Muslim personal law, the daughter would be entitled for L/i'd of the share in the suit schedule property and the son would be entitled for 2/3'd of the share in the suit schedule property and, therefore, the plaintiffs sought for decree of partition accordingly.

8. The revenue record bears the name of Mr. Abdul Rehman in the Khasra pahanies between 1954-55 and 1960-61 and, therefore, it was the name of Mr. Abdul Rehman which was reflected in the revenue records till I973-74. From lgTS-76 onwards, in the revenue records it is the name of Mr. K. Sri Ramulu which is reflected, all of which, led to the plaintiffs also seeking for appropriate entries in the revenue entries through the suit for partition that was filed.

9. Pending the suit, the plaintiffs also sought for amendment in the suit by adding the relief of declaration of a sale deed bearing document No.346 of 7964 executed on 01.06.1964 also to be bad in law. The said document was a registered sale deed executed by Mr. Abdul Rehman, the father of defendant Nos.1 to 15, in favour PaBe 5 of 12 t of Mr. K. Sri F.amulu who is the father of defendant Nos.16 to 19. The defendant Nos.1 to 15, the legal heirs of late Mr. Abdul Rehman, initially were proceeded ex-parte; however, subsequently they entered ,appearance at a belated stage, but did not contest the case and filed a written statement admitting the claim of the plaintiffs. The defendant Nos.16 to 19 entered appearance and disputed the entire claim of the plaintiffs right from the beginning i.e. questionin,g the status of the plaintiffs so far as being the legal heirs oflate Srnt. Yakoob Bee" So also, the defendant Nos.16 to 19 took the plea that the suit is highly belated and is otherwise not tenable as the:re was no evidence whatsoever available with the plaintiffs to substantiate their claim seeking for entitlement in the suit schedule property as a legal heir of Mr. Abdul Rehman, the original pattedar. The defendant Nos.16 to 19 also took the stand that the plaintiffs being fully aware of the registered sale deed in the name of Mr. Abdul Rehman w.e.f.

01.06"1964 have not challenged it almost for five (05) decades and they cannot now challenge the same, and therefore prayed for dismissal of the suit.

10. Pending the trial, after the pleadings were complete, the following issues were framed by the Trial Court for deciding the claim putforth by the respective parties i.e. the plaintiffs and defendants:

1. Whether the plaintiffs are the successo rsllega I Representatives of the late.Abdul Rehman ?

2. Whether the plaintiffs are in the possession of the property ?

3. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for partition and separate possession ?

4. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for declaration to declare the sale deed doc.No.34611994 dt.01-06- 1064 as null and void?

5. Whether entries in the revenue records in respect of the suit schedule property are illegal and arbitrary /

6. Whether the suit is barred by limitation ?

7. Whether the Court feed paid is correct ?

11. The plaintiffs examined 3 witnesses i.e. pWs.1 to 3 and defendant Nos.16 to 19 examined 3 witnesses i.e. DWs.1 to 3. Likewise, the plaintiffs marked 56 documents i.e. Ex.A1 to 35 and so far as the defendant Nos.16 to 19, they exhibited 62 documents i.e. Ex.B1 to 62 in support of their respective contentions. L2. The plaintiffs while challenging the impugned judgment contended that the impugned judgment is erroneous, contrary to law and also without proper appreciation of the oral and documentary r-.vidence adduced by the plaintiffs. It was also contended that the Trial Court has wrongly appreciated the evidence of D\,n/.1 who has supported the claim of defendant Nos.1 to 15 and, thus, has reached to an erroneous finding. It was also contended that the Trial Court has wrongly relied upon the evidence of DWs.2 and 3 while passing the impugned judgment. According to the plaintiffs, the finding of the registered sale deed dated 01.06.7964, in the name of K. Sri Ramulu being a genuine document, is bad in law inasmuch as the same is hit by Section 47 and 48 of the l\ndhra Pradesh Tenancy dnd Agricultural Lands Act, 1950

13. The further contention of the plaintiffs \VA S alleging erroneous finding oF the fact by the Trial Court in reaching to the conclusion that the sale deed dated 01.06.1964 being genuine executed betwr:en Mr. Abdul Rehman and Mr. K. Sri Ramulu and, with a further contention that, the sale deed is a fictitious document. Therefore, the same is liable to be declared null and void.

14. Though the defendant Nos.1 to 15 initially were proceeded ex parte; but later on they entered appearance and still did not chose to contest the case. Rather, went in not disputing or admitting the claim of the plaintiffs. This act on the part of defendant Nos.1 to 15 has rightly compelled the Trial Court to draw an adverse inference so far as the defendant Nos.L to 15 being in collusion with the plaintiffs.

15. In the course of appreciation of evidence, the Trial Court found that Ex.A27 which was a certificate issued on 22.72.1913 certifying the marriage of Smt. Yakoob Bee on 25.70.t926; however, there was no basis on which the said certificate was issued after almost eight (08) decades from the actual date of marriage. Neither is the certificate revealing the actual source on the basis of which the certiflcate has been issued. Likewise, the Trial Court found that Ex.A2B also was one which was issued by the Wakf Board not having any cogent basis on which the said certificate Ex.A2B was issued. The reason to disbelieve was that, the Wakf Board itself was formed in the year 1954, therefore, it was difficult tc, have been in possession of records in 1926. So also Ex.A29, the death certificate is only a mere certificate issued by the Sarpanch who is otherwise not an authority to maintain the reEister pertaining to birth and death. Thus, the Trial Court found the material document establishing the relationship that Smt. Yakoob Bee had with the original pattedar late Mr. Abdul Rehman. In the absence of a cogent document in this regard, it was justified on the part of the Trial Court to reach to the conclusion that the plaintiffs have failed in leading evidence to show that they are legal heirs of Smt. Yakoob Bee and also Smt. Yakoob Bee being the daughter of late Mr. Abdul Rehman. 16, Further, the Trial Court also found that the sale deed under challenge was one which was executed on 01.06.1964 and the suit was filed in tfre year 2013 i.e. after a span of forty-nine (49) years. The revenue records also reflects that the mutation proceedings wt-.re also carried out in the name of Mr. K. Sri Ramulu considering the fact that the age of the plaintiff at the relevant point was 74 years at the time of execution of the sale deed in the year 1964 and the time when the purchaser of the property Mr. K. Sri Ramulu had entered possession of the property, the plaintiff was around 25 years of age and he was a resident of the same village further goes to establish the case that in spite of the plaintiff being fully aware of the sale being made in the year 1964 and not challenging it for the next almost 50 years, establishes the fact that he was not aggrieved by the sale then made in favour of Mr. K.Sri Ramulu. After the death of Mr. K.Sri Ramulu, entries were made in the records bringing on record the names of defendant Nos.16 to 19, the legal heirs of Mr. K.Sri Ramulu. Further, from the records, what is also reflected is that PWs.2 and 3 though have been examined in favour of the plaintiffs, but there was not much which could be elicited by these two witnesses giving clarity and authenticity in respect of the claim raised by the plaintiffs or in order to substantiate their contentions put forth in their plaint.

17. Most of the documents which have been adduced by the plaintiffs to establish the relationship between Smt. Yakoob Bee and Mr. Abdul Rehman, were all documents obtained somewhere around the time when the civil suit was filed for the first time in the year 2013 and, therefore, the relevancy of these documents gets diminished unless there isno cogent documentary proof in this regard.

18. The plaintiffs, on the one hand, have not been able to establish the fact that they are the legal heirs of Smt. Yakoob Bee or for that matter the Mr. Abdul Rehman, the originat pattedar. They have als;o miserably failed to produce cogent material to show their continuous possessions vis-d-vis possession of the suit schedule proporty by defendant Nos.16 to 19. On the contrary, the defendants herve been able to show the sale deed that was executed on 01.06.1964 where the name of purchaser through the sale deed dated 01.06.1964 was reflected in the revenue records after the death of Mr. K" Sri Ramulu. The legal heirs of defendant Nos.16 to 19 names have also been entered in pahanies, all of which go to show that the Trial Court has gone threadbare into the real crux of the matter and thrashed all the contentions put forth while reaching to the said conclusion.

19. Even in the first Appellate Court stage, the appellants have not been able to improve upon their case with any other strong material other than that which was considered and trashed by the PaEe lZ of t2 Trial Court in the course of passing the impugned judgment under challenge in the instant appeal.

20. For all the aforesaid reasons, we do nOt find any merit in the instant appeal preferred by the appellants calling for an interference to the impugned judgment passed by the Triar court. The instant thus fails, and is accordingly, dismissed. Interim orders granted earlier also stand vacated.

21. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO OINT REGISTRAR To,

1. The V Additional District and Sessions Judge, nga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, N.T.R. Nagar, Hyderabad. (with records, if any)

2. One CC to Mr. K. Harish Kumar, Advocate IOPUC] 3. One CC to Mr. P. Lakshma Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies SECTION OFFICER mka N.}/ S TA rti I'z) rJ IM f' 0 5 iiHr .$ "<Qsg'g7 HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 JUDGMENT+DECREE AS.No.84 of 2021 DISMISSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT ra .l \qa i [ 3431 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE IWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA*'ESHWAR RAO APPEAL SUIT No: 84 of 2021 Between:

1. Abdul Sattar (Died per LR) (Appeilants No.16 to 18) 2. Abdul Sayeed, S/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 3. Abdul Wahab @ Abdul Dastagir, S/o Abdul Razzak, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Mllage, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

4. Durdana Begum, W/o Late Abdul eayyum, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

5. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Abdul eayyum, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 6. Abdul Khadeer, S/o Late Abdul eayyum, Aged about 3g years, Occ. Business, R:/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

7. Rehana Begum, Wo Abdul Ghani, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Tetangana State 8. Abdul Ghouse Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 9. Abdul Ghayaz Pasha, S/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.Nri.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. l0.Rubeena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 3.1 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.8-2-293lJB2tAag, Jubilee Hills, Journalists Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad, Telangana. 7 ll.Ruheena Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Tetangana State_ l2.Farhana Begum, D/o Abdul Ghani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Mllage, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. .

13.Sogra Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about 71 years, Occ. Hi.rsehold, Rl/o H.No.9-8-34, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad S00 008, Telangana

14. Malika Begum (Died Per LR's) (Appettants No.l9 to 25) 15.Tahera Begum, D/o late Abdul Razzak, Aged about S0 years,. Occ. . Household, Rt/o H.No.9-8-30, Kumarwadi, Chota Bazar, Hyderabad - S00 00g, Telangana 'l6.Sultana Begum,, Wo late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Household Rr/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

17.Neha Begum, D/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.6-37, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

18.Abdul Shahbaz, S/o late Abdul Sattar, Aged about 22 years, Occ. Household, Rio H.No.6-37. Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 19.Syed Mukthar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged aboul 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. 2O.Syed Umar, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63. Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State 2l.Naseeba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

22.Syed Yahiya, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Tetangana State

23.Tayaba Begum, D/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Tetangana State

24. Syed Farooq, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

25.Syed Osman, S/o Syed Yaseen, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-2-63, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. (Appellants No.13 & 15 to 25 Rep, by their General power of Attorney holder Khal6e[ Hussain, S/o. late Mohammed Vilayet Hussain, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.1B-13-6/8, Hashamabad, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad) ...Appellants/Defendants No.1 to .t5. Appellants No.16 to 1g are LRs of Def.No.1 and Appellants No.19 to 25 are LRs of Def No.l4 AND 1 . Mohammed Hassnuddin (Died per LRs 2 to 8) 2. Smt. Soghra Begum, Wo late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o 9-8-34

3. Mohammed Hassan Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business

4. lVohammed Habeeb Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business

5. Mohd. Shaf Uddin, S/o late lviohd. Hassanuddin, (Died - lssue less)

6. Mohd. Riyaz Uddin, S/o late Mohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business,

7. Mohd. Azhar Uddin, S/o late lr,4ohd. Hassanuddin, Aged about 47 yearc, Occ Busrness, (Respondents No.2 to 7 are Rl/o H.No. 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad).

8. Smt. Farzana Begum, D/o late tvlohd. Hassanuddin, Wo Ahmed Khan, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o 9-8-30, Kummarwadi, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/Plaintiffs

9. K.Nageshwara Rao, S/o Sri Ramulu, Aged about 58 years, Occ. Business '10. Smt. S.Yashoda,, D/o Sri Ramulu Aged about 52 years, Occ. Housewife, 11 . Smt. T. Lakshmi Kumari, D/o Sri Ramulu Aged about 51 years, Occ Housewife

12. Smt. S.Parvathi, D/o Sri Ramulu Aged about 51 years, Occ. Housewife, (All are Rl/o Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State )

13. The Tahsildar, Rajendrangar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ..:Respondents/Defendants No.16 to 20 --------- Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. setting aside the Judgment and Decree dated 01-C,5-2020 passed in O.S.No.1542 of 2013 on the fite of the Court of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nhgar, N.T.R. Nagar, Hyderabad. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgnrent and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upoa hearing the arguments of lvlr. IvI.g. Srinivasa lyengar, Senior Counsel represent'ng Mr. K. Harish Kumar, Advocate for the Appellants and Sri Mr. M.V.S. Suresh Kurnar, counsel representing Mr. P. Lakshma Reddy, Advocati: for Respondent No.9.1 1 and 12. This Court doth order and decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is dismissed; and 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO INT REGISTRAR J n To,

1. The V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, N.T.R. Nagar, Hyderabad.

2. Two CD Copies \ CTION OFFICER rAry- HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 DECREE AS.No.84 of 2021 DISMISSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT 6rn{ E \6T*