The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci'r the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to speed up investl 1312013 daled 22-01-2013 on the file of the 3 rd respondent 4th respondent herein forthwith for offences committed b'/ 12'1 ,1214, 124A., 1534, 1538, 295A, 298, 500, and 506 l.F. of the writ petition. umstances stated in may be pleased to )ation in Crime No. rerein and arrest the him under sections )., pending disposal IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to receive the documents annexed to the list by condoning tl-r delay if any, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI E,T.LAKSHMI NARYAN RE:l 'RESENTING SRI ANNNAMPELLI GANGADHAII ADVOCATE Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: ASST. GP FOR HOIiI : Counsel for the Respondent No.4: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION N o. 4923 0F 2019 DATED: 17.'12.2025 Between: Bethi Mahender Reddy, S/o. B. Venkat Reddy. AND The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others ::ORDER:: ... Petitioner Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief/s:- '...to issue an appropnate writ, or order or direclion, more pa(icularly one in the nature. of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 rn not making further investigation in F l.R. No. 13/20'13 daled 22-01-2013 registered against the 4rh respondent for offences under Sections 121, 121A, 124A,'153A, 1538, 295A, 298, 500, and 506 l.P.C. even afrer 5 years from the date of registration of crime and not arresting the 4b respondent for committing the said offences as highly illegal, arbilrary, and Jncbnstitutional being violative of Arlicles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and also amounls to dereliction of duty on the part of respondents 2 and 3 and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direcl respondents 2 and 3 herein to speed up investigation in Crime No.'13/20'13 daled 22-01-20'13 on the file of the 3d respondent and arrest the 4th respondent herein forthwith for offences committed by him under Sections 121, 121A,'124A, 153A, 1538, 295A,298, 500, and 506 l.P.C. and pass..." 2 >r--r \ -E

2. Heard Mr. T.Lakshmi Narayan, learned courr ;el, representing Mr. A.Gangadhar, learned counsel appearing for t : petitioner and lVlr. D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government p r ader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits ,-i t, as respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have failed to proceed with the investig€tt on in Crime No. 13 0f 2013 registered against the unofficiar respondent the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions ( the respondent police authorities. 4 The learned Assistant Government preader fc r Home submits that Crime No. 13 of 2013 was duly investigated, and t oon filing of the charge sheet, the case was taken on file as C.C. No. g4, of 2022 before the courr of the principar civir Judge-cum-Judiciar Ma ;istrate of First Class, Karimnagar. lt is further submitted that he case has subsequenfly been transferred to the court of the lrarned special Judicial Magistrate, Nampaily, as one of the accused is, r person under surveillance and a former legislator. The matter is pre senfly pending triar. Therefore' the contention raised by the petition€r as on date, and it is prayed that the writ petition be dismir sed. rr ;s5 not survive 5 I have perused the material placed on record 3

6. Having considered the grievance of the petitioner and the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, it is evident that, since the charge sheet has been filed and the matter is pending trial before the competent Court, the relief sought by the petitioner has become redundant. ln these circumstances, no further orders are warranted in this writ petition.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/-A. SRINIVASA RED ASSISTANT RE R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI ANNNAMPELLI GANGADHAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies BN BS w HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 ORDER WP.No.4923 of 2019 ....:

1.. t'. i) '. ') 1, x1t-'":' ':fi DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS G-{a vt- K"\r'