The High Court · 2025

, Qutubullapur X Road, Qutubullapur, Ranga Reddy 4. Smt.Peddi Annapurna, Wo. Peddi Shiva Prasad Housewife R/o. Flat No.4, Swetha Residency, H.No.10-51, Sowbhagya Nagar, Opp IDPL Colony, Balanagar, Hyderabad - 500 037.

5. The Patwari Enclave Phase-l Residents Association, rep. by its General Secretary P.Jagan Mohan Rao R/o. Flat No.102, Bruhaspathi Apartments, Patwari Enclave, Phase-!, Opp IDPL Colony, Hyderabad - 37. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in not taking action against the 4th respondent for the illegal unauthorized constructions made on the septic tank place on the southern side of the plot in Sy.No. 147lparl of Patwari Enclave, Phase-l, Opp. IDPL Colony, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and Consequently direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to initiate action for removal of illegal constructions made on the septic tank place on the southern side of the plot in Sy.No. 147lpart of Patwari Enclave, Phase-1, Opp. IDPL Colony, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District made by the 4th respondent l.A. NO: 1 r3F 2010(WPMP. NO:40916 OF 2010) Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to initiate action for removal of illegal constructions made on the septic tank place on the southern side of the plot in Sy.No. 14',tlparl of Patwari Enclave, Phase-|, opp. IDPL colony, Baranagar, Ranga Recdy District made bythe 4th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VENKATESHWAR VARANASI Counselfor the Respondent Nos. tto3: SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER REp SRI M. DHANANJAY REDDY (sc FoR GHMC) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI B. PRUDHVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.S:- The Court nrade the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JIISTICE SUDDALA CIHLI\PATHI RAO WRIT PEIITION o -32195 of 2OlO ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: o... to issue a urit or order or direction rlore partianlarlg one in th.e nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents iVos. 1 t9 3 in not taking action against the 4th respondent for ttrc illegal unautlwrized anstructions made on the septic tnnk place on tle soutlrcrn side of the plot in Sy.IVo. 147/part of Patwari Enclaue, Phase-l, Opp. IDPL Colony, Balanaga4 Ranga Reddg District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to t?e Hgderabad Municipal Corporation Act ConseEtentlg direct tlrc respondenf /Vos.I to 3 to initiate action for rem-oual of illegctl rcnstructions mad.e on the septic tank place on the southern side of the plot in Sy.No. 147/part of Patwari Enclnue, Phnse-L, Opp. IDPL Colong, Balanagar, Ranga ReddY District made bg the 4th respondent, attd pass... ,,

2. Heard Sri K.Ravi Matrender, learned counsel representing Sri M. Dhananjay Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. , t. Iit I I l, t I t: I t: I i : : 2

3. Iv\Ihen the matter came up for hearing on 22.o8.2o2s and also on prerdous occasions, it was brought to the notice of this Court that th,= counsel for the petitioner, Sri venkateshwar Varanasi, is no mor'3. In view of the sarne, the matter has been adjourned from time to time for service of notice on the petitioner.

4. As; seen from the prayer in the above writ petition, the limited grievan<:e of the writ petitioner is that the representati,on made to respondent No.3 has not been considered. The learned Standing counsel for respondent Nos.l to 3 submits that notice has already been issrued to the unofficial respondents for further action, and contend:s that appropriate steps will be taken to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.rr.2olo in accordance with law.

5. In vie'*, of the same, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the petitioner's represenration dated 24.Ll.2olo hy following due procedure of lau,, u'ithin a period of eight (g) weeks from the date of receipt ol'a copy of this order.

6. Needless to say, respondent No.3 shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as respondent Nos.4 and 5 before taking any ,: : t; u F!' i I :: 1i 3 action, and shall alford them an opporhrnrff of being heard prior to passing any orders.

7. [n view of the above directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscellaneous petitions, if arry are pending, shall stand closed. To, ,,TRUE COPY/ SD/- M.JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER The commissioner, Greater Hydera.bad Municipal corporation, near Tank a;"0, XJir"Lnt to BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad' The Zo na I Com m i#o;;r:d;Gr'ffyOe-raUaO M u nici pal Corpo ratio n' No rth Zone, H yde ra bad, ;"""i fHrnOLraO5J Cou rts Complbx,. Secu nd e rabad' T h e D e p uty co |n ri.lTo ;,; Artr'br l q'i, nr nt fi f i pal' C.i rcl e, G reate r H vd e ra b a d Municipat corpor"iiii, dit6;i;puix coid, Qritubutlapur, Ransa Reddv District. One CC to One CC to One CC to Two CD CoPies s RI . vEN KArES HWAR V R{N{sl fdvocqtg-[oP-y!1 ^ s"ni. Hlr.-oiiAr.rAN.rAV iieloY tsc foR-Gll4c) [oPUC] 5iii. 6l FRUbHViKUMRR, Advocate [oPUC] 1 2 3

4. 5. 6. 7. BM TKS i>,"tr,,, HIGH COI,RT DATED:0'110912025 I i! i I I I i I lu. r ;'t ( (. ?2 J AN ?[27 ! d o() \ ORDER WP.No.3i2195 of 2010 DISPOISING OF THE WRIT PETITION WIHOUT COSTS @ trtC' 14\r"\r 5