Civil Revision Petition No. 5518 of 2011 · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petitioners-tenants preferred the present Civil Revision Petition being aggrieved over the order dated 21.07.2011 passed R.C.A.No.1 of 2010 by the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. Heard. Initially, respondents herein filed Rent Control Case No.3 of 2001 before the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, under Section 10 (2) (i) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1961 seeking to direct the petitioners to pay arrears of rent and to vacate the schedule premises and to hand over the vacant possession, which was allowed by order dated
04.03.2010. As against the said order, petitioners herein preferred R.C.A.No.1 of 2010, which was dismissed by the Appellate authority vide impugned order. Challenging the same, present revision has been preferred. This Court has carefully gone through the orders passed by both the trial Court and also the appellate Court and also heard the rival contentions on either side. This Court finds no merits in the present revision and the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or perversity seeking interference of this Court.
Operative part
At this time, learned counsel for the petitioners sought time to vacate the premises. Taking into consideration the said submission and also the fact that the petitioners-tenants are in possession of the schedule premises for a considerable period, the following directions are issued: 1) petitioners shall file an affidavit on or before 15.06.2012 before the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, submitting that they will vacate the schedule premises by 15.12.2012, 2) the possession of the petitioners over the schedule premises is not be interfered with till 15.12.2012, and 3) on failure of the petitioners to vacate the schedule premises by 15.12.2012, the respondents are at liberty to proceed further in this matter against the petitioners. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this revision, if any, shall stand closed. Dated 24th April, 2012 ________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.