Kurva Jamanna v. 1. The State of Telangana

13. Smt. Padmamma, W/o. Late Chinna Thayanna, aged 38 years

14. Eramma, D/o. late Chinna Thayanna, aged 38 years

15.Anjanamma, D/o. Late Chinna Thayanna, aged 27 yearc

16.Anjanamma, D/o. Late Chinna Thayanna, aged 25 years

17. Eeramrna, S/o. Late Chinna Thayanna, aged 19 years

18.Chinna Jammanna, S/o. Buddanna, aged 5g years 19.Pasulanna, S/o.Eerappa, aged 5g years, Respondents 10 to ',l9 are residents Obulonipally Villary ,, Dharoor Mandal Gadwal District. (Respondents 10 to 19 are Not Necessary parties in ttri ;writ petition) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rn,r a praying that in the circumstances stated in,the affidavit fired therewith, tht: High court mav be pleased to issue a Writ, orderor Direction;;;";;ri;,i '"i" Liir*'r;i'rl r, writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of the 4th responder t in not imprementing the directions of the 3rd respondent passed in Fire N,r alrsroli606,;aieo 09.03.2016 by directing the 4th respondent to condur;; denova connection with the agricurturar rands of the petitioner situ rted in sy No. 46712 "nqrirV' (Ac.1.00 gts),466 (Ac.2.2t.gts) and 465/4 1ec.t.ZS gts), to:; textent otn..S.rO gt situated at Bijwaram Vi age, tvrardakar [r4andar, roa Gaowat- District without considering the representation dated 1s.01 .,o2"r of tne petitionei is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justic r and atso ,,oiitive or Articles 14, 1s,21 and 300-4 of constitution of rndia and cc rsequenuy directlhe 4th respondent to mutate the petitioner name in onrine revenue iecords by deleting the names of the unofficial respondents 4 to 9 fro.r the revenue records by issuing the onrine ppBs and rrDs in favour of the petit c rer in the interest of justice. -Jogurar lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the ci-r umsrances stated in the affidavit .fired in support of the peiitio;, in" uign cou 1 may oe pteaseJ to direct the 4th respondent to imprement the directions of t-r r aro ,."rpono"nt to conduct denova enquiry in File No. Bl151012006, dated 0() )3.2006 UV O"f"i,"g the names of the unofficial respondents 5 to 9, by mutating :t g petitioner name in online revenue records by issuing the fresh pattadar passboc <s and tifle deeds in connection with the agricurturar rands of the petitioner situ r ed in Sy No. 46712 (Ac.1 00 grs),466 (Ac2.27 Strl 3lq 4.65t4,Ac: 1.2g gts), totat extentof Ac.S.16 gt situated at Bijwaram ViIage, Mardakar IVandar, Joguramb r Gadwar District bv considering the representation dated 1g.01 .2022 0f the p"tiii""ui p"rii"g disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. VENKATA NARASHIMHT. tEDDy Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, ASST. GP FOR REVE NUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S to 9: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.47O2 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is hled under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not implementing the directions of the 3'd respondent passed in File No.B/ 1510/2006, dated 09.03.2016 by directing the 4th respondent to conduct denova enquiry in connection with the agricultural lands ol the petitioner situated in Sy. No.467 /2 (Ac.1.00 gts), Sy.No.466 (Ac.2.27 gts) and Sy.No.465l4 (Ac.|.29 gts) total extent of Ac.5.16 gts situated at Bijvvaram Vitlage, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, without considering the representation dated 19.O1.2022 of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to mutate the petitioner name in online revenue records by deleting the names of the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 9 from the revenue records by issuing the online PPBs and TTDs in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice ..."

2. Heard Mr. M. Venkata Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L.Ravinder, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader lor Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.i to 4 Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the lather of the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of -- _!_q 2 the agricultural lands situated ln Sy.a67 / 2 admeasuring Ac. 1.O0 guntas, Sy.No.466, admeasuring Ac.2.17 guntas and Sy.No.465/4, admeasuring Ac.l.29 guntas, I rtal extent of Ac.5.16 guntas situated at Bijwaram Village, M: ldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadrval District and the revenue olli ials are issued pattadar passbooks and title deeds in lavour ol his father ulde patta No.91 I

4. While the matter stood thus, respondent \ r.4 - Tahsildar without issuing notice to thc father of the petition :r, mutated the narnes of respondent Nos.S to 9 in the revenl r records. The father of the petitioner ancl others challengerl he said wrong mutation proceedings before respondent No.3 aLt d the same is numbered as File No.B/51Ol2006, wherein r:;pondent No.3 passed an order dated O9.O3.2016 by allowing he appeal, the matter is remanded back to respondent No.4 r,r'i -l . a direction to conduct denova enquiry, bv duly issuing nor i :es to all the concerned and to take necessary action. The father of the petitioner died on 27.01.2013. After death of ris father, the petitioner approached respondent No.4 to i nplement the direction of respondent No.3 to conduct denova er quiry. But, no action has been taken by respondent No.4 3

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that on 19.01.2022, the petitioner made a representation before respondent No.2 to direct respondent No.4 to conduct denova enquiry in respect of the agricultural land of the petitioner Since no action has been taken by respondent Nos.2 to 4, the present writ petition has been filed.

6. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue by furnishing a copy of instructions submitted by the Tahsildar respondent No.4 u,ould submit that as directed by respondent No.3, respondent No.4 will conduct an enquiry into the subject matter as per relevant provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Act,2025 and seeks to pass appropriate orders.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and upon perusai of the material placed, and without going into merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondent No.4 to conduct denova enquiry as expeditiously as possible by issuing notices to all the concerned parties and by affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law. I I I I I 1

8. With the above direction, this Writ Petitior r is <iisposed of. 4 \ There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions pendir-rg, if any, shiLl stand closed SD'. ). PONNA KRISHNA ASl; STANT REGI$TRAR l./ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' The Stirl ) of Telangana, Secretariat, l-lyderabad

2. The District C6llector, Joqulamba Gadwal Distrrct at GiLr wal 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal, Jogulamba Ga lwal District 4. The Tahsildar, Ir,4aldakal lVlandal, Jogulamba Gadwal Di trict S, One CC to SRI M. VENKATA NARASHIMHA REDDY, I dVOCAIC [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Sta e of Telangana

7. Two CD Copies BS q/l BN HIGH COURT DATED:2011112025 ORDER WP.No.4702 ot 2024 .I o i,;;\.' ( r,-.., :\ (f c \) * 22 :'1], M .'/ l.' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS {+ F, C9 1q,,z;