The High Court · 2025

2. Tondupalli Yadamma, W/o Late Ram Reddy, aggd aboyJ 68 y-ears, R/o Srinivdsagudem village, Mamidipalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, T.S. .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar- .4. The Mandal Revenue Of ficer, Nandigama Mandal. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, Mamidipalli Revenue Village, Mamidipalli Village, Nandigama [ilandal, R.R.District.

6. The Grampanchayat, Srinivasagudem, Rep.by its Secretary' Srinivasagudem / Nandigama Mandal, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 herein in threatening to disposes the petitioners from the land admeasuring Ac.0.16 gts of the 1st petitioner and Ac.0'14 gts of the 2nd petitioner respectively situated in Sy.No. 421 of Srinivasagudem village Mamidipally revenue village, Nandigama Mandal, .,*;,;;i:i.E&1::;. . , -. Ranga Reddy District without issuing any notice and withou. )ancelling the pattas issued by the Government of Telangana by virtue of prc;eedings final patta certificate vide R.C. No.8/668/87, dated.22l8l1987 and B/6(ir 187 dated.22.8.1987 is being illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Art 14, 21, 3004 of the Constitution of the lndia and violative principles oI latural justice and consequently direct the respondents herein not to disposes the petitioners from the land. l.A.NO:1 OF 2020 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that rn the c r rumstances stated in the affidavit fiied ln support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to in terfere/d isposes th3 petitioners from the land admeasuring Ac.0.1 6 gts., and Ac.0.14 gts of t I I petitioners herein respectively situated in Sy.No.42'l of Srinivasagudem village, Mamidipalli Revenue village. Nandigama [\4andal, Ranga Reddy Distric.l pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI KOPPULA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.t to 5 : GP FOR REVEN|.I : Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI c.NARENDER REt) )y TheCourt made the following ORDER w ,,/., (:) fr THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.4778 OF 2O2O ORDER: This Writ Petition is lilecl secking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Responclents 3 to 6. in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from the land admeasuring Ac.O.16 guntas belonging to the 1st pelitioner, and Ac.O.14 guntas belonging to the 2nd petitioner, situated in Sy.No.421 of Srinivasagudem Village, Mamiclipalll' Revenue Village, Nandigama Mandal, Ranga Reddv District, without issuing any notice and without cancelling the pattas issued by the Government of Telangana vide final patta certifiiate proceedings R.C.No.B/665187, dated 22.O8.Pa7, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of Articles 14, 21, and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India, and againsL the principles of natura-l justice; and consequently to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners lrom the said land.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Governrnent Pleader for Revenue. 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners s r ibmits that the petitioners are the beneficiaries of pattas grantr'r L b1- the crstwhile Government ol Andhra Pradesh in respect of I rr-rd admeasuring Ac.O.16 Eluntas in favour of the 1st petiLioncr irL c[ Ac.O.14 gunters in favour of the 2nd petitioner, situatecl n S1.. No.42 1 of Srinivasagudern Vil1age, Mamidipally Fl venue Village, Nandig:rma Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, vide R.C No.B/668/87, ciated 22.Oa.1987. The pattas r.,:re granled upon remittance ol Rs. 137.50 each to the creclit o( the Government through the Sub-Treasury Office (S.T.O), li radnergar-, under Challan Nos. 624, 625, 627, and 628, date: 1q.08. 1987. lle submits thal- since the date of grant of pattir;, thc petitioners havc becn in continuous possession, enjoymc - 1, ancl cultivation of the said lancl, after remitting the [ecessal-\ fees lor the trees subsisting in the said portions of land, in cor rpliance with the Abkari Trees Act, 1358 Fasli, as per Notiticition No.6, dated

31.08. 1968, issued by the Revenue Departmr:nt

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners [tu-1] cr subrnits that. while the matter stood thus, the official respcrLdents, under the in{luence and prqss+rre of certain political prr .ties and without rssulng arty t-totrce, are attempting to disposs: ;s the petitioners a from the land in question, which is uncler their cultivation. He contends that such action is in crear vioration of constitutiona.t I I I I I I t mandates. He, therefore, seeks the indulgence of this Hon,ble Court to pass appropriate orders clirecting the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners lrom the subject land. 5' on the other hand, rearned Assistant Government preadcr for Revenue, upon instructions, u,ould submit that the official respondents are not trying to dispossess the petitioners from the land in their possession and only on assumptions and presumptions, filed this Writ petition prematurely, and sought for dismissal of the Writ petition. 6 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government pleacler for Revenue, and upon perusal of the material piaced berore this court, this court, without expressing any opinion on the aspcct of possession of the subject land by the petitioners, deems it appropriate to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners except _by_following due process of law. / 4

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petitit n is disposed of /_l There shall bc no order as to costs. As a se,1 rel, miscellar-reous petitions, il any, pending shall stand dismissed ,TRUE COPY' SDA SRI 'I. JAWAHAR REDDY ASI ISTANT REGISTRAR \ I.. \.1*-': !rcror.r oFFrcER Telangana at Hyderabad.

1. The Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Build r !s, State of 2 The Dlstr ct Coliector. Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nandigama Mandal. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, Mamidipalli Revenue Villa ye, lr4amidipalli Village, Nandigama Mandal, R.R.District Nandiganra lvlandal, R.R. Diskict.

6. The Secretary, Grampanchayat, Srinivasagudem, Srin,asagudem. / 7 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the S r te of Tetangana at 8 One CC to SRI KOPPULA GOPAL, Advocate [OpUC] 9 One CC to SRI G NARENDER REDDY, AdvoCate (OF r C) 10. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] To SA BM HIGH COURT DATED:0410912025 q. ORDER WP.No.4778 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. l) & \ \% \,L,