1. Peddagade Pentappa @ Pentaiah v. The State of Telangana

Petition r rc :' Section 151 CPC praying that in the circu nrsti:Lnces stated in the affidavit filed r ;upport of the petition, the High Court may c() pl-.ased pending ,,e writ petition to direct the Respondent to ssue Raithu Bandu disposal of the €b, for the Survey \o. lrl3l eo 11l1l1,3931 @12,3931 @ 1112,3931 ce /1, 393/ s l1l112, 393/ eel 3. Counsel for the P rtitioners: SRI RAMESH BABU VISHWANATI{Ul..A Counsel for the R rspondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court macle t rer following: ORDER . HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2OSOO of 2o23 ORDER: It is stated that the petitioners are the pattadars and possessors of the land to an extent of Acs.8.1600 guntas in Sy.Nos.3e3/A/Lltlt, 3s3lA/2, ss3lAltl2, 393/A/ l/1/2 and 3931A/3 situated at Kudurmaiia Village (Doultabad), Dodyala Mandal, Vikarabad District. It is further 3s3lAA/1, stated that the names of the petitioners were recorded in all the revenlle records and the petitioners have also issued pattadar passbooks and title deeds in their favour uide Khata Nos.787, 60218, 1121, 602\4 and 60213. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they are entitled for Raithu Bandu as investment subsidy for cultivating the. aforesaid lands as per the policy enunciated by the Government, the respondents are not releasing the said amounts to enable them to cultivate their 1ands.

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4. Perused the record'

3. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has submitted that as per the information received that the District Court, Vikarabad uide order Dis.No. 1 1 1, dated I CVBR, J \\1),20500 2023

18.01.:20t ! r':s granted interim injunction over tL e srtbject lands in Sy.No.l)oI :nd its Sub-Division numbers an<l in v cv of the said order, tht: s L rJ surwey numbers have been blockr:c,. Unless the said srrr',t'i' numbers have been deleted from l;l, rcking, the petitioners : -e not entitled for receiving 3r-I r investment subsidir:s / -a r l-ru bandu amounts.

4. Mr. \ . Ramesh Babu, learned counsel rpr)earing for petitior-rer s I : s submitted that there is no Court o:dr rr operating the lands o lhe peti[ioners situated in Sy.NO.393 a rcl its Sub- DivisiorL rrr u r:)ers. It is stated that lhe petitioncrs hiLve received the sunrnror : :rnd after verification of the record, tlrc1 lbund that there ert'e L r-r ,:straint orde rs issued by the cornpcl c rt Court. In facl, h,: l a ; submitted that in thc mistaker-r irnp:ession the responclcrr s ] ave notified the lands of the petitrone rs a; prohibited lands zrn I I e injunction order passed by the I)is:rict Court, Vikarabatl, r ; not applicablc to the lands of tht: peti,io,rcrs herein, in anv rn:r lcr. Learned counsel also conterd:d that mere penden,:y rf .he suit does not take away their riglr t of receiving raithu l>a r:l' i ilmounts and the same does not l;inc 1 l-re respondent authoritir s I , l;locking the said survey number.

5. Irr r r':r :rf the above submissions and sinr:e it i; stated bv the learned As;i, ant Government Pleader for Revenue tlrat civil suit is i l I I % 3 CVBR, J wp 20500 2023 pending and injunction orders are operating and as it is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that there is no injunction order operating rhe land of the petitioners in Sy.No.393 and its sub-division numbers, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be met if the petitioners are permitted to hle fresh application before the respondents seeking for deletion of their lands from blocking. In the event of such application being made the respondents are directed to verify the Court .orders whether it is operating on the petitioners' lands and the petitioners are party defendants to the said proceedings and in the event of said orders are not operating on the petitioners lands, the respondents are directed to delete the survey numbers . of the petitioners from blocking and release the raithu bandu amount within a period of four (4) weeks, from the date of application made by the pet it-ioners.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 7 . As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shali stand closed. ,TRUE COPY// SD/. SD/- T. JAYASREE DEP UTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER erabad, The State of To,

1. The Principal Secretary' Revenue Department ivisional Officer, udurumalla Villag .0 Vikarabad District,Telan al, Vikarabad Telangana, Telangana 0/0. R.D Revenue D e, Doulaiabad Mand Tahsildar K Commission er of Ag riculture , Groun d Floor, D-Blo ck, Near Nizam College, Basheerbagh, Hyder abad-500001. Rames h Babu Vishw anathula, Advocate One CC to Sri ourt for the State o Twb CCs to G P for Reven Hyderabad I Two CDCo toP f Telanga na, at gana. District. ue, High C OUrl

3. 4. 5 6 7 TJ HIGH COIJFT DATED:1 3t1212025 ORDER WP.No.205,l0 of 2023 o ( (L o o -: - E -\\ i t.4 i 2 I'i i i:125 C,) i--:''' '_ t" ''-''t - -:= ---:--j (1 DISPOSII\I( i OF THE WRIT PETITION wlTHour liosTs \ D: rr (X-),/_)