The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the FIR in Crime No. 162i20'18 of Khammam ll town Police Station and the corresponding charge sheet copy in C.C. No. 84O ot 2018 on the file of the I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Khammam as additional material papers in l.A. No.2 of 2022 in L.A.A.S. No. '155 ot 2014 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 2TO 4: SRI B. SHIVA RAM SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 : Smt. KIRANMAYI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR SRI C. SHARAN REDDY The Court delivered the following Judgment: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVT EADA L.A.A.S.No.l55 of 2014 JUDGMENT (per AKs.r) When the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt. Kiranmayi, leamed counsel appearing for the respondent/claimant Nos.5 to 7 has informed the Court that the issue raised in this appeal squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in I-.A.A.S.No.242 of2017 and batch dated26-09-2024. Learned counsel for the appellant has also not disputed about the said fact and submitted that in the said appeal, this Court was pleased to enhance the compensation from Rs.400/- to Rs.6000i- per square yard. Learned counsel for the respondents/claima nts has also not disputed about the said fact. In view of the same, this Court is of the considered opinion that following the judgment passed in L.A.A.S.No.242 of 2017 and 2 batch dated 26-09-2024 and for reasons alike, this appeal is also disposed of with an observation that the respondents/claimants are entitled for enhancement of compensation from Rs.400/- to Rs.6000/- per square yard and they would also be enritled to for l5% interest fiom the date of taking over physical possession i.e. l7-10-1986 till the date of publication of Section 4 (l) Notihcation i.e.25-10-2006. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR Note: This Judgment is amended as per the Court Order dated 08-07-2025 passed ln l.A.No. 1 of 2025 in L.A.A.S.No. 155 ol 2014 by substituting Rs. 60001 in place of Rs. 6001 This amended Judgment substitutes the Earlier Judgment dispatched on 17-06-2025. To //TRUE COPY// Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO TJOINT REGISTRAR /Q,l'I ,l SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal District Judge at Khammam.( with records) 2. Two CCs to GP FOR APPEALS, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.
3. One CC to Sri B Shiva Rama Sharma, Advocate (OPUC) 4. One CC to Sri C. Sharan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies W kul/PSL I !.il Ir9 l:-=*. i- Cz.---\. '1:t'ti:' i.. ( ii'.! i: t1 r.,f:l i\',i/ -.r,1./r' t,) i],l l\l\- 2 * D o O h HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/202s 08107t202s +DECREE AMENDED JUDGMENT LAAS.No.155 ol 2014 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL WTTHOUT COSTS fl 1 4 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AC OUISITION FI RST APPEAL NO: 155 0F 2014 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer, Revenue D1v1s191a] District. AND p-[ficer' Khamm-am' Khammam "'APPELLANT/ Referring Officer - I 2 3 Koooula Madharaiah, S/o China Sarvesham, Occ Mason Mestry' Ryo kf,Shaprra* Haveli. Khammam Town and District' T.Madaramma, W/o. Latd Narsaiah, Aged 55 years' Occ Household' R/o' 11- 7-55, N.S.T.Road, Khammam District' P. China Madharamma, W/o. Kodanda Ramaiah,. Aged 50 years'.Occ' ir;;;;h;6, R/; u r.lo.7-e-+0, Dwaraka Nasar, Khammam District'
4. G. Adi Lakshmi, W/o. Pitchaiah, Aged 40 years' Occ' Household' Rl/o 11-7- 55, N.S.T.Road, Khammam District' ( Resoondent Nos. 2 to 4 are impleaded as per Court Order daled 27-11-2024 iriae t.n.ruo. I of 2O22 in LAAS No. 155 of 2014) Koooula Suvarna, W/o. Late Sarvaiah, Aged about 39 years' Occ Housewife' R/d.' H.No.7-3-1 5, Dwarakanagar, Khammam' Koooula Udav Nikhil, S/o- Late Sarvaiah, Aged about 20 years' Occ Student' nyd.' n.ruo.z-5-t 5, Dwarakanagar, Khammam' Vemula Bhavani' D/o. Late Koppula Narsaiah, W/o. Vemula Satheesh, Aged ;#ri'rny;;, bi. Hortu*ife, F/o' n'No t 1-11-22etNt26' Ramanasutta' Khammam. 5 6 7 / Resoondent Nos. 5 to 7 are impleaded as per Court order dated 27'11'2O24 iia" t.n.ruo. 2of 2022 in LAAS No. 155 ol 2014) ...RESPONDENTS Appeal Under section 54 of L.A.Act of 1g94 aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 28-08-2013 in LAop No. 932 of 2008 on the fire of the court of the Principal District Judge at Khammam. .Th9 appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of grounds filed in the Appeal, the Judgmentlnd Deciee of the Lower court and the record in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Gp for Appeals on olrriti ot the Appellant and Sri B. sHlvA RAM SHARMA, Advocate for Respondent ttos. i to 4 and smt. KIRANMAYT, Learned counser for sri G.SHARAN, Advocaie -for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7. This Court doth order and decree as fo[[ows: l. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of. 2. Tltat the respondents/ craimants be and hereby are entitlcd fbr enhancement of compensation fiom Rs. 400r- to Rs. 6000/- per square yard and they wourd arso be entitled to for 15 o/o interest from the date of tai(ing over physical possession i.e. l7-10-1986 till the date ofpubrication ofsection 4 (r) Notificarion i.". is-to-zoo6.
3. That there shall bc no order as to costs in this appeai. Note: This Decree is amended as per the Court Order dated O8-O7-2O25 passed ln l.A.No. 1 of 2025 in L.A A.S.No. 155 of 2014 by subsfrtuting Rs. 60001 in place oi Rs. 6001 This amended Decree substitutes the Earlier Decree dispatched on 17-06-2025. To l. The Principal District Judge at Khammam 2. fwo C.D.Copies Kul/PSL M- Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR \\[It t ':- {.-.1'^ _.-, :- - --1': -- { 0 JUI. M ($ t' x o \\ * HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 0810712025 AMENDED DECREE LAAS.No.155 ol 2O14 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS r^1 ?0)q