The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
2. Shriram General lnsurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its authorized Signatory, 100003-E-8, R ll Co. lndustrial Sitapura Jaipur, RajasthanPin302022-. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Sri M. Kiran Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: None Appeared Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri Rama Krishna Reddy The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE,JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUD: AN RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.439 of 2O15 JUDGMENT: This M.r\ C.M.A. is settled before LoL Adalat vide Award dated 13.09.2025 passed by the Lok adalat Bt:nch of High Courl Legal Services Committee, t{ t h Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. In vier,r' ' rf the sarne, nothing remains in the present M.A.C.M.A.
2. Accordingly. this M.A.C.M.A. is dispose: of in terms of the Award dated 13.09.2025 passed by tt t tok Aclalat Bench of High Court Legal Services Comr rittee, High Court for the State of Telangala, Hyderabacr . There sha-ll be no order as to costs Interim order and miscellaneous petili rns, if aly, pending in the M.A.C.M.A. sha-iI stand el-osJd Sd/. M. JAWAHAR REDDY , ASSIS TANT REGISTRAR ,,/ 6 //TRUE COPY// ;ECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) rt Khammam (With Records, if anY)
2. One CC to Sri tr4 Kiran Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri A. Rama Krishna Redddy' Advocate [OP[J ]l 4. Two CD CoPies $- (Copy of Award of Lok Adalat enclosed) t ,t HIGH COURT BRMR, J DATED: 1711012025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.439 o12015 ( J t :). ,'/t ^. i\- DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK-ADALAT WITHOUT COSTS \, ,€L W- 4('t\ ^5 _---_'::.:...- ,1. .) jA} 2 0tc P5 .\ a. ), ,-i .*,-, l;rrr irrli t -,' BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT /\) HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD) IUnder Secti on 19 of the LegJt Services Authoriti es Act, 1987 (Central Act)l Date: 13-O9-7025 +-"!. BES o C) I r) HIGH COURT LOK ADAITT :;,i*F * ,. ot1 Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, (Fo.mer Judge, Hon'ble Hiqh Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman 2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member M.A.C .M.A.No.439 of 2015 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST M. V.O.P No.609 of 2O12 (On the fite of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunat (District Judge) at Khammam) Between:- Gundeboina Rama Krishna, 5/o.Veeraiah, Aged about 25 Years, Occ: Student and giving tuitions to 5th to loth ctasses at Rejeshwarapuram, R/o. RajeshwaraPuram vittage, Netakondapatty Mandal, Khammam District AND
1. Deshasgoni Saidutu, S/o. Sattaiah, Age: Major, Occ: Owner of Lorry bearing No.AP16TU4356, R/o.H.No.3-6-2, Bahadurguda, Sarur Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
2. Shriram General lnsurance Company Ltd-, Rep. by its authorized Signatory, 100001-E-8, R ll Co. lndustriaI SitaPura JaiPur, Rajasthan Pin 102 022. Counset for'the Appettant/Ctaimant CounseI for ResPondent No.2/ lnsurance ComPanY Representative of lnsurance Company ... Petitioner/APPellant ... Respondents/ResPondents Sri M.Rajamatta Reddy, Advocate/ Sri Kiran Reddy Mattarapu, Advocate Sri Mohammed Babu, Manager, ThisappeathavingbeenreferredforsettlementbeforethisLokAda[atand after hearing tire LearneJ Counset for the parties and also the parties, the fottowing award is passed: AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribuna{ th costs and Rs.58,000/- (Rupees Fifty ei interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition, titl the date of deposit- The rest of claim of the petitioner is dismissed without ght thousand onty) wi costs. -l lrhis is an appeal fited bythe Ct aimar t 'Petitioner a ggrieved by Award passed in MVOP No.609 of ?ltT by Ctaims Tribunal (District Judge) at l(h. r manr the Motor Accidents Ii r -:-::i-=a 1 thE\ l 5ri Mohammed Babu, Manager for tht Respondent No.Z_lnsurance Company and Appettant/ petitioner I tng with his counseI has appeared before the Secretary, .j gh Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and identjfler ,,vith his Aadhar Card and Photograph and his signature was att,,: .r:d by his counset. During the penderrcy of this Appeat, the tt )etta nt/ petitioner and the Respondent No.2lnsurance Compar I have entbred into a settlement.and in pursuance of the sa I ]. the Appeftant/ petitioner has agreedito receive an amount oi F ;.1,65,000i - (Rupees One takh sixty five thousand onty) towarrl: futt and final settlement apart from the amount atready det ,sited and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the sar e towards futt and fioal setttement of the Ctaim. Accordingty, c trnpr omise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Ada ; :. ln view of the above said settlement, t tc, lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the above said amount vithin a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of c )py of this Award, afier deducting the amount that was deposi .r d, if any. ln the.event of defautt or detay in making such deposil, the Ctaimant/Appettant is entitted to.ctaim interest as awarded bv j re Tribunat. Com pensaTon Awarded (Setttemetrt Reached) in the .Lok Adatat. I SER HIGH COURT LOK AOALAT --t t t !4" Skle o11 Apportionment of Compensation, if an v Additional Direction (s): The Appettant/ Petitioner/Ctdimant is entitted to the refur( of court Fee paid in this case. 2 The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Comp.-rry if any, shatt be given credit to.
3. Soon after deposit by the rnsurance company, the..Appettant, etitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amound. ri. , ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, th(. )arties and their counseI have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the comprofi:.ie r arrived at disposed of. I between the ti.ties, this case stands 6- \'t\ 6- ----- . Ae.taA \gS t\uo0 &es [n-",, . {i, Appeilant. (9| I t Respondent (s) iol Sii tar-r in0 i lnsurance Co, Ltd, A!ihorNed argnSlcr-!, Counsel for the Respondent (s) G-fu"orrorsh.nq go\ t ,vu Counsel for the A \llr"1 I t) rp.e Itant (s) CHAIRtIAN stB C\l l\ MEMBER r t COURT , I.I'GH LOK * (Seat of the Committee)