M.Ravinder Reddy v. The State of Telangana, rept. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SARATH
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Having regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons z[ike in the order dated o3.og.2o2s passed by the b\- t i ,,:iiffiiiii;:jnr.# 3 Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23138 of 2025, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lt/andamus, declare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing the retirement/pensionary be:nefits such as GPF amount of Rs.7, 19,872t- with Token No.26o29zOte8, unfair, unjust, discrimination, apart from violation'oJ all the Statutory Rules and Constitutional provisions and consequently direct the respondents to release and pay the said pensionary benefits with interest @ 18 % per annum from date of retirement to till the date of actual payment is made, -i;-iiregai,-irOitiaiv, lA NO: 1 oF 21 26 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the retirement/pensionary benefits such as GPF amount of Rs.7,19,8721- with Token No.2602920188, to the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of writ petition. Counse! for ttre Petitioner: SRI C.SAI REDDY Counsel for ttre Respondents: AGP FOR SERVICES-II| The Court ma, Ce the following:
ORDER .
.. .t.... :,.' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 20.26 .o.l Between: M.Ravinder Reddy. AND The State of Telanga.na, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Finance Department and others. ORDER: Petitioner Respondents Heard Sri C.Sai Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-Ill appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the instant Writ Petition questioning the action \ 2 of the respondents in not releasing the petitioner,s retiral benefits, despite token numbers having a-lready been raised by the resp<>ndent authorities for payment of the amounts payable to the petitioner.
Lea:rned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the /is raise,c. in the present writ petition has already been adjudical.ed by the Division Bench of this court in w.P.No.23138 of 2o25, which was disposed of uid.e order dated o3.09.20:25, and thus prayed to pass a similar order in the present V/rit Petition also.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-Ill did not dispttte the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the disposal of w.p.No.2313g of 2o2s dated 03.09.2025 and submits that the respond.ents will release the amotrnts on a priority basis of the token numbers and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders.
Operative part
Having regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons z[ike in the order dated o3.og.2o2s passed by the b\- t i ,,:iiffiiiii;:jnr.# 3 Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23138 of 2025, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible, preferably within ] Period of six (6) weeks from today, failing which, the entire alnount with regard to the retiral benefits shall carry interest at the rate of LOo/o pet annum, from the date the amount fell due, tiIl the actual date of its payment. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ Petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. A. SREENIV ASSISTANT /TRUE COPY/ To,
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department Telangana.
2. The Principal Secretary, Home (Police) State of Telangana.: N OFFICER , Hyderabad, State of Secretariat, Hyderabad,
3. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Government of Telangana, lnsurance Buildings, Abids, Hyderabad
4. The District Treasury Officer, Ranga Reddy, Kongarakalan, Ranga Reddy District.
5. One CC to SRI C.SAI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-II|, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
Two CD Copies BSR GJP dl- I* I a CC TODAY SiAIE c)() 19r$m * "j.l- HIGH COURT DATED:1210212026 ORDER WP.No.4,l00 of 2026 DISPOSIING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS -:^,, .'l{+5U.rr?*} - '.:rii!g*Jiiiii{i
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.