The High Court · 2025

Sri. lmran Khan, S/o late Rahmath Khan Aged 38 years Occ. Daily Wager, R/o H.No. 14-8-157, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. I ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the P.R.C.No.231 of 2024 for the offences U/s 506, 427, I p.C. & sec: 25 (1) (A) Arms Act pending on the file of XVI Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioner in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 I Petition under S6ction 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings of the case vide P.R.C.NO. 231 of 2024 pending on the file of XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad for the offences U/s 506, 427,|.P.C. and Sec. 25 ( 1) (A) of B.N.S.S. Act 2023 pending disposal of the rhain quash petition, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 { Petition under S ion 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand0m of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to appoint his G.P.A. to represent him on his behalf, in this case. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 BETWEEN: Sri. lmran Khan, FUo H.No. 14-8-157, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad o late Rahmath Khan Aged 38 years Occ. Daily Wager, 1 . The State of Tela Telangana, Hyderabad AND na, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of ...RespondenUComplainant @ lrfan Khan, S/o late Rahmath Khan, Aged 33 years, Occ. H.No. 14-8-157, Near Ontwadi Mosque Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad by his G.P.A., Khaja Khan, S/o Rahmath Khan, Aged about 41 Business, Rt/o H.No. 14-8-157, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar,

2. lshaq Khan Student, Rl/o represented years, occ. Hyderabad. I I ...RespondenUAccused J", Petition under S ion 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the lpetitioner/defacto-complainant to compromise the case against the respondent No. 2/Accused in P.R.C. No.231 of 2024 for the offences U/s 506, 427.1.P.C. arid Sec. 25 (1) (A) Arms Act, pending on the file of XVI Additional Chief Metropblitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad pending disposal of the main quash petition. I I This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Syed Kareemuddin, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Mohd Ghiyasuddin Ansari, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEV] t.A. Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITIO NN o.2125 ot 2025 / cOMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in P.R.C.No 231 ot 2024 on the file of XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Seclions 506,427 of IPC and Section 25(1XA) of Arms Act. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the 2. petitioner as well as the respondent No.2' that during pendency of \ the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences

3. Vide order dated 18 02 2025 this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad' for identification and to submit a report. 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 22.02.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in p R C. No,23 1 of 2024 on the file of XVI Additional Chief Metropotitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. sd/-v. HARI PRASAD t ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1

2. 3 4 5 6 TheXVlAdditionalChiefMetropolitanMagistrate,Nampallycourt' +;!"JenX House officer' shahinavathgunl Police.statron Hvderabad Two CCs to the Public p,"t"i,i"i'H-igtiCJu't tot the State of Telangana at Hvderabad [OUT] Ka reemudd i n' Advocate [o P u cl^ ljl'l"cCiJ 3ii 5'nI66 iI sii vi"na cnivasuJoin Rnsari' Advocate [oPUC] Two CD CoPies -svLd - ADI(PR \X Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromtse HIGH COURT DATED:04/0312025 I I COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.2125 ot 2025 -(HE s14 e , -)/o t) O1 I4AY ?UE o 7 r,) .{+ * i I I I I I i ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.NOs.2&3OF2025 "dLdtr{, ! IN Betweeh: orandum of uash Petiti on Filed U/s 52E of B.N.S.S. ofCr.P.C. ) IIIGII COURT OFJUDICA TURE F'oR THE STATE OF TELANGANA:AT ERABAD. Crl. petition NO. of2024 Ishaq Khan @ Irfan Khan S/o late Rahmath Khan Aged 33 years Occ: Shrdenl Y." I IO t4-B-1s7,Near 6ntwadi Mosque Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad - Aadhaar NO. 2174 2485 3426. Kh,j Occ: Business, R/o H.NO. 14_8_15i, Chudi BJzar,, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad Aadhar. NO. sa s i 100 i r +s s r.h* i; ffi;'Ki;:ru:T:ffi liT' fl il " AND'

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public prosecuror, High Court of Telangan4 Hyderabad.

2. Sri. knran I(fuan S/o ]ate Rahmath Kian Aged 38 years Occ: Daily Wager, R/o H.NO. 14-8-157, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. ] l { I I j -! j I i I I I I l I l i i I l I I I t { i I I I l : Petitioner/Accused Respondent/Complainant. RespondentTDe facto-complainant I 2 JOINT O FILEDBY THE PETITIONIi RS/ACCUSED NO. ITo3& NO.2/DE FACTO -COMPLAINAN T. RESPOND That basin on a complaint made by the respondent NO. 2 rhe p.S. Shahinayatbunj, Hyderabad has registered a case vide crime No. l t8i2024 for the ofttnces U/s 506, 427 r'P'c' and sec: 25 (1) (A) of Arms Acr a.d after co,rplerion of the investigation the said police has filed its charge shect r idc cr,.R.C. No. 23rt2024 which is pending. That the petitioners herein and the respondent No- 2/defacto-complainant have settled their dispute outside of the courl anrl in vier,v of the said settlement compromise the respondent doesn't uant ,n procced with the casc in view ofthe said compromise and seftlement betwcen thc parties .Lrc to intcrvention of elders and /,"-. *L==1 6\-*^ 9 3 well-wishers. In view of compromise the case in p.R. rudiciar Masistrate griev4nsg with the petifioner herein as such he wanted 237/2024for the offe,""" r; ;-,:: Act pending on the file ofXV we want permission of this Hon'ble cou,t to " r#"I"^'iJ#::,d,iilie nre orXvrAddr. chier t No' 2 is not having any w?nreo to quash this case vide ces u/s 506' 427' r'P'c'& Sec: 25 (l) (A) of Arms p.R.c.No. I Addl. Chief Judicial Magisrrate, at Hyderabad. That in view ofthe above want to proceed with this compromise pendency o, *f" sought this case is required to "u- tuto *oo -o circumstances i t"n" the petitioners/A"" j:Jt:: :,I ::;tTJ I case would be abuse of process of law. I{ence she be quashed against the petitioners. 4\woner throulh G.p.A. s. Petiti Ilespondent NO. 2.lD efacto_Complain ant COUNSEL FOII. THE pETITIONERrAccused (lOUNSlrl. IOR Ti]E RESPONDENTNO.2.